Skip to main content

Upon reviewing the thread regarding Batteries and BCR's, I've been doing some research regarding the advantages/disadvantages of which option to choose.  Especially, considering the majority of my engines are all of the same time frame, and begining to show indication of needing replacement.  So far this is what I'm finding,

 

- The BCR's don't appear to have any downside from what I've read, other than cost.  (Personal note a friend of mine was having a problem with the engine not maintaining the id (PS2).  I was suspcious of the battery, and when I opened the tender it was a BCR.  I replaced it with a battery and everything was fine.  Possibly a defective BCR?)

 

- I therefore assumed that the primary factor comes down to cost.  Given the cost of the MTH batteries I was looking at alternatives.  I found both the battery types at a considerable savings.  They both seem to have the same specifications that are required.  Does anyone see anything I'm overlooking?

 

I would think it would just be a matter of soldering the connecter on for the 2.4v battery,  and nothing required for the 9v battery.

 

Any comments?

 

In case there are problems posting the images the

 

http://www.batteryspace.com/ni...shavereitronetc.aspx

 

http://www.batteryspace.com/ni...highcapacity1pc.aspx

 

Attachments

Last edited by Don(Cerritos)
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I am unsure if it matters for the mth locomotives, and I am unsure what is shipped new, but if you can find them for a fair price I would recommend looking for NiMh batteries that state "Low Self-Discharge"  These will hold about 70% charge after a year storage (real world tested with the Duracell, name brand, ones.)  May not be an issue to have a dead battery when you first apply power, But I've heard enough on the PS1's to avoid it if possible.  As a note, NiMh batteries that are not specifically marked as "pre-charged" or "Low self-discharge" will drain on the shelf much quicker than NiCad's.  Usually 3-5 days in my experience.  

 

Note 2:  I use only Duracell "pre-charged" rechargeable in my camera equipment and they are my top choice for rechargeable batteries.  I'v tested Rayovac and they seem almost as good.  other brands have been hit or miss with how long they hold a charge and with how many charge cycles they last.  Energizer falls to the bottom of the list, as I have never seen a set of their rechargeable batteries that has lasted more than 9 months without at least one battery failing.  

 

For me, having never spent more than $400 on a locomotive, and much less on most, I see the merit of finding cheap batteries, however with most of the engines out there way north of $500, I don't know that I see the value in taking a chance on some of the cheap ones.  I've seen $2000+ camera bodies destroyed because folks wanted to save a few bucks on a battery.  Anything I put in my camera will always say Genuine Nikon for that reason, and only Duracell in my equipment.  

Last edited by JohnGaltLine
Originally Posted by Mike CT:

Lithium Polymer batteries have excellent power to weight ratios.  But anything that says LiPo also has potential for problems. Knock-off LiPo even more so. IMO. You find these batteries in most laptop computer.  They are also very popular in the model airplane hobby. 

Yes, Li-Po are great ...BUT, charging them is not the same as ni cads nor NiMH...Be extra careful...if you use the wrong charger, a guaranteed fire/explosion will happen...FYI...

Add Reply

Post
The DCS Forum is sponsored by

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×