Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I agree with david1! The market is SATURATED with modern diesels, and Sunset/3rd Rail has many more potential sales for diesel models that have not yet been produced in 3RS. Models such as: FP7, FL9, FT (done CORRECTLY), and various passenger E unit models using the Sunset/3rd Rail/Golden Gate Depot new design power chassis, which came out with their new E7 models.

 

Personally, I will discourage Scott Mann from doing ANY modern diesels, until he "finishes" the older "historic" models, that have not yet been done correctly!

Good Day Gentlemen,

 

The market maybe saturated with SD70MAC’s but not prototypical SD70MAC’s. The MTH SD70MAC truck placement is incorrect and the K-Line and Lionel SD70MAC’s have an anemic fuel tank. I still think there is a market for the prototypically correct SD75M, SD75I, SD70MAC, and SD70M.

 

My thinking on production runs, I would say that 3rdRail is very capable of offering diesel locomotives from the past and modern day diesel locomotives all in the same time period. More diesel locomotive projects give Mr. Mann more leverage with the model production companies.

 

Respectfully,

Frank Swafford         

 

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Swafford:

 More diesel locomotive projects give Mr. Mann more leverage with the model production companies.

 

Respectfully,

Frank Swafford         

 

 

I sure doubt THAT! Leverage with Chinese production companies is an oyymoron.

 

Good Day,

 

I respectfully disagree. New business is new business no matter where it is produced. Even the Chinese companies want new and more business. I would think the more projects you can bring to a model train manufacture the more leverage you would have in business negotiations.

 

Regards,

Frank Swafford 

 

Originally Posted by Swafford:

BN and BNSF SD70MAC's.......................sweet!

 

Regards, 

Swafford

BN SD70MAC pix 2

BNSF SD70MAC

I've got three of Mike's earlier 70's with the Eddie Bauer paint schemes, scale wheels, and Proto2. Not a lot of detail on them, but the real thing doesn't have a lot either. Utilitarian in looks, kinda' like a 4x4 Jeep with a huge motor.

Originally Posted by Swafford:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Swafford:

 More diesel locomotive projects give Mr. Mann more leverage with the model production companies.

 

Respectfully,

Frank Swafford         

 

 

I sure doubt THAT! Leverage with Chinese production companies is an oyymoron.

 

Good Day,

 

I respectfully disagree. New business is new business no matter where it is produced. Even the Chinese companies want new and more business. I would think the more projects you can bring to a model train manufacture the more leverage you would have in business negotiations.

 

Regards,

Frank Swafford 

 

Scott has already learned that you do not deal directly with Chinese production companies.  He deals only with Korean companies that deal with the Chinese production companies. 

 

And as the 3-rail IS saturated that would only leave 2-rail.  He has said repeatedly that the 3-rail Scale market is what makes his things doable.  I asked him about something like a joint venture with Lionel on their SD70Aces to do the 2-rail only and he pretty much said Lionel would laugh him out of the building or make it so prohibitively expensive as to not be feasible.

 

Also his schedule is pretty much booked up for the next 3 years with the stuff announced/in process and who knows what will happen by then.

The 70's that Frank proposed would be first choices for me... especially, a MAC and a SD75I. Fixed pilots; proper truck placement; accurate scale length for the MAC(74'0"); realistic vents for the AC equipment; precision, deep molded-in body details(deep enough to cast a bit of a shadow...especially, for the front door); realistic looking mu hoses and wipers...

 

 

 

Rick

Good Day Gentlemen,

 

Thank you for posting and providing your insight. Perhaps someday one of the model train companies will present the prototypically correct SD75M’s, SD75I’s, SD70MAC’s, and SD70M’s. Time will tell I just wish it was soon.  

 

To me the Santa Fe SD75M’s and BNSF SD70MAC’s are fantastic! Runners up, I like the SD70M’s with flared radiators too. I think the UP and NS has this model.

 

Best regards,

Frank Swafford  

ATSF SD75M Cab 209

BNSF SD70MAC Cab 8888

BNSF SD75M

BN SD70MAC

UP SD70M Cab 4638

UP SD70M Salt Lake 2002

Attachments

Images (6)
  • ATSF SD75M Cab 209
  • BNSF SD70MAC Cab 8888
  • BNSF SD75M
  • BN SD70MAC
  • UP SD70M Cab 4638
  • UP SD70M Salt Lake  2002

Good luck

The only saturation I see is re-hashing of E8's, F3's, F7's, PA's, GG1's.

The K-Lionel SD75 was their Best model to date. Too bad they were ashamed of it. The only updating it needed was a scale fuel tank.

You will have more of a chance convincing a Railroad to Paint one in a Heritage scheme and then it will probably be made.

Can a guy get an SD45-2, F45, GP40X, GP50 or a B36-7 for a change???

 I'm not real picky about some of the mistakes of previous models as released. I did make the mistake of not ordering the MTH (executive) as I was mad that they weren't two rail versioned for me. I should have just got the executive scheme to have it. I also passed on a K-line as I felt it also would be too much work. Now, I'm sad that I did not get them.

 I just bought a used Conrail SD80Mac (from Lionel) that appears to have a small tank also? I just like the looks overall too much to care. I should have got the MTH version but again I slipped. I don't have the patience to wait years for perfect models. I have to buy what I can afford and make them work.

 I have several HO scaled SD70s from Athearn Genesis line that I love. History has showed me that I seem to be buying the same O scale choices that I made in HO. Being a modern fan, I want the executive, a warbonnet, and a CN version. My wallet does not always comply. Thanks for churning up the wants again Frank!!!

 Just playin' Frank. Keep posting these great pics. At least I can look at them on my computer until I get my hands on them. I had an Overland in HO once. Maybe someday, an O scale version.

 I would be shocked if Scott made this. I would order one just for saying thanks. Joe

Joe,

 

I bought the MTH Premier executive, didn't want to weight, either.

 

Not bad, but could be better. A solid performer, though. I really like that livery and the green trucks.

 

Something about that particular era of EMD body styling, that I really like. Maybe, it's their clean/uncluttered design?

 

As I said, my first choice...

 

 

Rick

Hi Frank,

 

My reference book states "BN's landmark 350-unit order became the foundation of a  BN/BNSF SD70MAC fleet that topped out at 786unit..."

 

It also states that, "BN 9400-9571 were the onlySD70MACs built without isolated cabs."

 

and that,

 

"In March 1995, beginning with BN9572, the isolated cab became standard on the SD70MAC."

 

Reference information supplied by: LOCOMOTIVES - The Modern Diesel & Electric Reference

 

by Greg McDonnell

 

BTW, I have seen, many, many times, both the executives and the heritage painted MACs; working BNSF's four unit coal trains, with two units at the front and two at the rear, coming from and going to Delta Port(Roberts Bank Superport), in southern British Columbia.

 

They're usually teamed up with GE motive power... ES44ACs and/or AC4400CWs.

 

Thanks for the pictures.

 

 

Rick

Originally Posted by Swafford:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Swafford:

 More diesel locomotive projects give Mr. Mann more leverage with the model production companies.

 

Respectfully,

Frank Swafford         

 

 

I sure doubt THAT! Leverage with Chinese production companies is an oyymoron.

 

Good Day,

 

I respectfully disagree. New business is new business no matter where it is produced. Even the Chinese companies want new and more business. I would think the more projects you can bring to a model train manufacture the more leverage you would have in business negotiations.

 

Regards,

Frank Swafford 

 

As somebody that has spent a fair amount of time working in China over the last five years, I think you are looking at the world through rose colored glasses.  Please read Scott Mann's threads on this forum, and when you are through with those, download the first 11 issues (IIRC) of "O Scale Trains", and read "Crapola from the Cupola" by John Smith, formerly of Pecos River Models.  Whether it is Chinese or Korean production companies, it is a very tough business, and for most companies, a sideline to other businesses. 

 

But nothing stopping you from taking a crack at it.  It all sounds so easy. 

 

Regards,

GNNPNUT

As noted, would love to see some 70 series locos with updated details, fixed pilots and scale wheels.  Frank pictures are awesome and agree with Joe, at least we can see them in photos until they are released.  

 

Granted it's unlikely for MTH or Lionel to offer upgraded versions anytime soon, but I think it's more likely than 3rd Rail doing them?  Perhaps Bachmann will come through on the SD70/75 series?

SD70MAC - Noted. There seems to always be room for an improved model.

FP45 - Thinking about it.

 

The nice thing is, I know most of you.. and most of you understand the limitations of this business. If I can move enough of them, I will put them into production.

 

Cheers,

 

Scott Mann - China

Scott,

Thank you for considering this project. I would also be interested in the SD70MAC (in 2-rail). I have 2 from Overland & I could use more.

Naveen Rajan

 

Originally Posted by sdmann:

SD70MAC - Noted. There seems to always be room for an improved model.

FP45 - Thinking about it.

 

The nice thing is, I know most of you.. and most of you understand the limitations of this business. If I can move enough of them, I will put them into production.

 

Cheers,

 

Scott Mann - China

 

Scott, I would at least take a BN scheme plus a BNSF H2 scheme.  Perhaps one more.  (So, 2 or 3 for me).
 
Thank you for noting our interest and considering the SD70MAC. 
 
 
Originally Posted by sdmann:

SD70MAC - Noted. There seems to always be room for an improved model.

 

The nice thing is, I know most of you.. and most of you understand the limitations of this business. If I can move enough of them, I will put them into production.

 

Cheers,

 

Scott Mann - China

 

Originally Posted by Swafford:

Hey Joe,

 

What road name? CSX?

 

Regards,

Frank 

I just got home Frank. I would buy CSX, or BNSF, or UP, or NS, or CR, CN,.....ummmm..... I really like them all. How about the SusQ??

I am always a fan of who used each model the most and/or what I have seen. So CSX goes right by me and BNSF (in executive or speed lettered) is in all my books.

 

Last edited by Engineer-Joe

David,

Thanks for the link. I visited Wikipedia & learnt something new. Although I have to admit that the term “HOOD” is used in multiple contexts in USA & is confusing. When I read “hood unit” yesterday, the first image that came to mind was a hip-hop / Urban themed paint on a locomotive with lots of bling & chrome spinners on the low profile wheels, meant to be used in Hollywood movies like “Boyz n the Hood” or “Set it off”.

These are just my opinion.

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
Originally Posted by DaveJfr0:
Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

I am not familiar with the term “hood units”. What are the locomotive models that are examples of “hood units?

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

First item on Google:

https://www.google.com/#q=hood+units&safe=off

 

 

I would reserve 2-rail version of the BNSF locomotive but in the executive scheme with the isolated cab as in the following photo.

http://www.railpictures.net/vi...d=490733&nseq=16

http://www.railpictures.net/vi...d=484191&nseq=48

 

If I had the option to reserve a CSX SD70MAC with the slightly flared radiators shown in the following photo, I would reserve that too or I would just reserve 2 of the BNSF executive scheme SD70MAC.

http://www.railpictures.net/vi...d=458662&nseq=87

http://www.railpictures.net/vi...102950&nseq=1957

 

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 
Originally Posted by Swafford:

Good Day,

Who would be a buyer if Scott Mann offered the SD70MAC and SD70M in 2-Rail and 3-Rail? I'd be a buyer for the BNSF and BN SD70MAC's

 

What road names? 

 

SD70MAC: CSX, BNSF, BN, Conrail  

SD70M with Flared Radiator: UP or NS 

 

Regards,

Frank

 

Overland made the ATSF, BNSF, ON & CN SD75M, UP SD70M & CSX SD70MAC (both with slightly flared radiators) in O-Scale in 2005. I regret missing the opportunity to buy the CSX SD70MAC at that time. If I had known that Overland would be offering another run of the SD70ACe with the same models, I would have bought the SD70MAC instead of the SD70ACe.

I could be wrong but aren’t SD75M & SD70M, 2-feet shorter than the SD70MAC? I have never owned a Sunset / 3rd Rail model, but I see on this forum that they pay a lot of attention to small details. So that could mean that they need to make models in 2 different lengths if they make SD70M (SD75M) & SD70MAC in the same run.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Naveen, you maybe right about the length. I got into a discussion with a guy about which type of cab must be used on each model. He insisted I chose the wrong cab type on one, and should have rounded the corners more. I have only photos to go by and no real experience. I do believe that each RR orders whatever cab is available that meets their wishes and they probably change during the run?

 I also notice rebuilds of engines where the cab gets swapped out for whatever reason, like accidents.

 

Definitely agree with Naveen. 
 
I'm in for both the SD70/70M's as well as the SD70MAC's.
 
SD70's
CN
IC
NS
 
SD70M's
CN
NS
UP
 
SD70MAC's
BN/BNSF - Executive scheme, BNSF paint outs
BNSF - H2/H3
 
Originally Posted by naveenrajan:

Well I immensely dislike steam era locomotives, freight cars & transition era locomotives & am looking forward to seeing more scale-size SD70MAC in O-Scale.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

 

The SD70 is a beautiful locomotive and personally, I would like to see allot more offerings in highly detailed SD70 macs. I have one SD70Ace in NS Penn Central livery by MTH. This is a Premier locomotive with all the detailing one might expect. Everything from moving fan blades to working ground lights etc, this locomotive is really fantastic. SD70 Macs are numerous, but really detailed ones are far and few in the 0 scale/gauge market.

 

I have a USA Trains G gauge rendering of the SD70 Mac. It is done in UP livery with the American Flag. Common theme, but really a first rate job by USAT on this particular locomotive. Anyway, I would like to see more done myself, but like one poster pointed out, not everyone cares about what I think should be produced/manufactured/created.

 

Pete

I will be the first to admit that I may have missed something on the way to catch the train. I have a couple of the early MTH SD-70s which are actually SD-60 bodies painted in the Executive BN Scheme, I checked the bodies against the plans and they are SD-60s not SD-70MACs. Now MTH has produced a newer SD-70M within the last couple of years or so. I purchased a body shell off of the Bay and checked it against scale drawings and it proved to be a SD-70M.

 My point is that if MTH or whoever produced a correct SD-70MAC in plastic would someone bring me up to speed on this offering. My current plan is to use the 60 shell and kit-bash an O Scale version according to plans and article published in RMC concerning an HO version.

   I would like to have BNSF SD-70MACs in all the different paint schemes, the prototypes were my favorite to operate. 

I believe Sunsets future market in plastic diesels will be more 2 rail, based on the FT production which was 400 2 rail and 50 3 rail. It will be interesting to see how the F7 run developes.Most of the 2nd and third generation diesels have already been made by Lionel and MTH in varing degrees of scale for the 3 rail market with limited 2 rail options on some diesels from MTH.In all likelyhood the 2 rail buyers choices will be the deciding in what models get built.JMO

Engineer Joe hit the nail on the head. SD70Macs or sd7/9's or whatever are not special.  What they are is relevant and substantial and meaningful to the industry.  If you want to talk about what's special or what you like, please post on a thread about postwar 3r or Polar Express or Thomas the tank engine.  
 
Whether you like SD70macs or is not relevant in this forum.  What is relevant is that SD70macs were widely produced, widely used, and still on the rails after a few decades past their intro.  They deserve a place in o-gauge railroading and if you model modern stuff and don't like them, it really is your loss.
 
 
Last edited by Rich Melvin

This forum is active enough that you can get a really good indication of interest for such a project.  I have no idea what a SD70 MAC is, but I would be willing to bet money that if five hundred orders were placed with deposits, Scott would bump this project ahead of his planned 3-year production.  I bet he would do it if you simply put the deposits in an escrow account.

 

I think you are off to a good start - I bet there are more than ten of these spoken for above.

What I find very interesting with this thread, and its cousin over on the two rail forum is not one individual that professes to want SD70MACs / SD70IACs has bothered to pick up the phone and discuss the project with Scott Mann.  Better to have a hobby posting on OGR?

 

Is the SD70MAC and its successor the SD70IAC relevant.  Sure is, if you model BNSF.  Yea, CSX, TMF and Alaska ended up with a handful of them, but every other single mega railroad passed.  

 

So you may get about eight variations of paint schemes if you include the BN and BNSF variants.  I don't know specifically how many paint schemes there are on these, as I really don't care.  When I see these things, all I get is Glendive MT nightmares of freezing my arse off, and Alliance flashbacks of Carhenge (I think I still have a pink t-shirt from that visit). 

 

So Scott will be tooling in plastic for a one hit wonder, and the tooling cost for a narrow carbody unit, with the detail that you guys profess to want, is going to be WAY higher than any F unit.  All the fans will need to be individual moldings / castings.  I'm sure that you guys will want see thru screens by the radiator hatch, DB intake, inverters etc.  Then there are individual handrails, front pilot details, truck details, etc.  Want a flared rad model too?  More cost, different tooling for the cooling hatch. 

 

Given the cost of the F units, I'd say these would easily fetch over $1,000.00.  

 

In my opinion, if Scott wanted to do a modern hood unit, he should do the GP40-2 (if you consider 1972 and later as modern ).  Nobody has done that model in O scale, there would be a plethora of road names, and enough variants such as Canadian cabs to further heighten the interest.

 

What would be interesting is if Scott actually did test the waters and offered the SD70MAC.  Like Bob2 said, ya got maybe 10 orders already, only 490 to go, assuming that a 500 unit production run would get 'er done.  I don't think Scott would get the pre-orders, but I'd sure like to be proven wrong.  

 

There definitely is a strong market for 1980s to modern era motive power and equipment.  The stuff sells VERY well in HO.  Transition era MP&E is still very popular in both HO and O, but with every passing day, the market gets smaller and smaller.   However, the market in O is SO small, that even if the market keeps expanding, it is still a VERY small market. 

 

So guys, pick up the phone, talk to Scott, and see what he says.  After all, it is HIS capital at risk.  At least then you will know if this whole wish is a granfalloon or not (thanks MWB for that word, learned something out of the 2 rail thread ).

 

Regards,

GNNPNUT

Stuck in 1952 in HO, 1953 in O, nuthin' newer than a GP7 or GP9 respectively for me.     

Good Day, I sent an inquiry to Scott this afternoon and below is his reply. I also suggested the GP40-2 which I have campaigned for several years.

    

Regards,

Frank

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you Frank.

I will consider your ideas. Right now I have several Cab units I am looking to make. Then maybe some more modern.

Scott Mann

Good Day,

I sent a note to Scott yesterday and suggested the SD70MAC, SD70ACe and ES44AC for future production! This is his reply:  "Thank You Frank.  In time we may hit all of these.  Scott Mann"

If you wish to see these engines presented by Scott please send him a note with your interest.

Regards,

Swafford

gnnpnut posted:

What I find very interesting with this thread, and its cousin over on the two rail forum is not one individual that professes to want SD70MACs / SD70IACs has bothered to pick up the phone and discuss the project with Scott Mann.  Better to have a hobby posting on OGR?

 

Is the SD70MAC and its successor the SD70IAC relevant.  Sure is, if you model BNSF.  Yea, CSX, TMF and Alaska ended up with a handful of them, but every other single mega railroad passed.  

 

So you may get about eight variations of paint schemes if you include the BN and BNSF variants.  I don't know specifically how many paint schemes there are on these, as I really don't care.  When I see these things, all I get is Glendive MT nightmares of freezing my arse off, and Alliance flashbacks of Carhenge (I think I still have a pink t-shirt from that visit). 

 

So Scott will be tooling in plastic for a one hit wonder, and the tooling cost for a narrow carbody unit, with the detail that you guys profess to want, is going to be WAY higher than any F unit.  All the fans will need to be individual moldings / castings.  I'm sure that you guys will want see thru screens by the radiator hatch, DB intake, inverters etc.  Then there are individual handrails, front pilot details, truck details, etc.  Want a flared rad model too?  More cost, different tooling for the cooling hatch. 

 

Given the cost of the F units, I'd say these would easily fetch over $1,000.00.  

 

In my opinion, if Scott wanted to do a modern hood unit, he should do the GP40-2 (if you consider 1972 and later as modern ).  Nobody has done that model in O scale, there would be a plethora of road names, and enough variants such as Canadian cabs to further heighten the interest.

 

What would be interesting is if Scott actually did test the waters and offered the SD70MAC.  Like Bob2 said, ya got maybe 10 orders already, only 490 to go, assuming that a 500 unit production run would get 'er done.  I don't think Scott would get the pre-orders, but I'd sure like to be proven wrong.  

 

There definitely is a strong market for 1980s to modern era motive power and equipment.  The stuff sells VERY well in HO.  Transition era MP&E is still very popular in both HO and O, but with every passing day, the market gets smaller and smaller.   However, the market in O is SO small, that even if the market keeps expanding, it is still a VERY small market. 

 

So guys, pick up the phone, talk to Scott, and see what he says.  After all, it is HIS capital at risk.  At least then you will know if this whole wish is a granfalloon or not (thanks MWB for that word, learned something out of the 2 rail thread ).

 

Regards,

GNNPNUT

Stuck in 1952 in HO, 1953 in O, nuthin' newer than a GP7 or GP9 respectively for me.     

The SD7/SD9 project will get the ball rolling for narrow carbody units and detailed fans so at some point in the future newer hood diesels will get produced as Scott has stated he has several other projects ahead of these units. Accuracy and a reasonable level of detailing within market pricing are the goals, I don't believe most on this forum would expect Key level of detail.Bear in mind for any desired model reservations dictate production.JMO

Last edited by hibar
hibar posted

The SD7/SD9 project will get the ball rolling for narrow carbody units and detailed fans so at some point in the future newer hood diesels will get produced as Scott has stated he has several other projects ahead of these units. Accuracy and a reasonable level of detailing within market pricing are the goals, I don't believe most on this forum would expect Key level of detail.Bear in mind for any desired model reservations dictate production.JMO

An accurate opinion I believe. There are at least two committed diesel projects planned after the SD units and three additional ones are under consideration after that. SD70 MAC is not included in that list but something newer than the SD7/9's is.

hibar posted:

Down the road quite possibly a newer SD unit something that the prototype was produced for a lot of RRs  think SD 38s/39s 40-2s, I believe the 6 axle diesels provide more engine for the dollar. JMO

True, however both Lionel and MTH have made TONS of such models, and it is thus very difficult to compete against such high volumes, no mater whether they did them correctly or not.

Hot Water posted:
hibar posted:

Down the road quite possibly a newer SD unit something that the prototype was produced for a lot of RRs  think SD 38s/39s 40-2s, I believe the 6 axle diesels provide more engine for the dollar. JMO

True, however both Lionel and MTH have made TONS of such models, and it is thus very difficult to compete against such high volumes, no mater whether they did them correctly or not.

Bear in mind Sunset with their new drive system and more rd name specific detailing is selling to mainly the 2 rail market, I believe the FT diesels were mostly done in 2 rail and at 400-500 models probably 1/3 of a typical Atlas run of 4-5 road names and far less than MTH/Lionel runs this is their target market.just saying!

The locomotive I am presently lobbying for on the schedule is the GP40/GP40-2 which has only been done by MTH and not very well at that.  Scott is hesitant and thinks that even that may be too new.   Several people have approached him about Trainmasters but he feels that has already been done to death at lower price points (hey Hot Water can you say TM demonstrators?).  So has the F7 (in spades) and that project was successful so...   Nothing has been penciled in beyond the PAs as of yesterday for diesels but interest will be gauged at York just as it was at the Chicago meet last week.

If done with road/era specific detail, an SD40-2 would be a sure hit, especially for the 2R community with the horizontal drive.   As noted, although previous runs by Lionel, MTH, Weaver, etc... there are many paint schemes and era's that this locomotive can be produced for, so as long as the tooling supports some modularity/flexibility would certainly be a good product to invest in....   Lionel's recently reinvested in new tooling for the SD38/SD40 so there is obviously something to this model's flexibility if done correctly.

IMO, It would be nice to see Scott incorporate the electronics interface to use the ESU Loksound Select L decoder (Plug and Play) in place of the QSI titan

Mike DeBerg posted:

Joe,  Who makes that concrete tie track?

 

Sorry Mike, I missed your question! I had to look to make sure it was to me.

That grey track is G scale. They are Train-Li ties in grey that I paint again to protect from the sun. I tried some of their nickle silver rails (in the picture) as a test to compare with the Aristo stainless that I use exclusively. I do like the ties.

 Otherwise, I'm not sure what track your question is about? I wish I had bought some 2 rail O scale with concrete ties. I think I had found some, years ago and forgot about it??

Engineer-Joe posted:
 
Sorry Mike, I missed your question! I had to look to make sure it was to me.

That grey track is G scale. They are Train-Li ties in grey that I paint again to protect from the sun. I tried some of their nickle silver rails (in the picture) as a test to compare with the Aristo stainless that I use exclusively. I do like the ties.

 Otherwise, I'm not sure what track your question is about? I wish I had bought some 2 rail O scale with concrete ties. I think I had found some, years ago and forgot about it??

Joe,  No worries.  More curious than anything.  I hadn't seen that before in G scale.  They look great!

Scott asked about SD70MACs about 6-8 months ago and I said I would be in for a couple but they are BNSF and ARR only and think GP40-2s would do better.  The Amfleet cars are the first ones with less than ~6 railroads he is willing to try.  But the majority of the feedback he received on doing any 2nd and 3rd generation diesels was the SD40-2 would do the best.  Seein' as how he has less than half of the needed reservations even to begin the design work that's not coming along as hoped.  The FP45 is in the same situation.  The 3-rail market is satisfied, and saturated, with the Lionel and MTH versions of all the above and the 2-rail market is just not large enough to sustain any alone.

rdunniii posted:

Scott asked about SD70MACs about 6-8 months ago and I said I would be in for a couple but they are BNSF and ARR only and think GP40-2s would do better.  The Amfleet cars are the first ones with less than ~6 railroads he is willing to try.  But the majority of the feedback he received on doing any 2nd and 3rd generation diesels was the SD40-2 would do the best.  Seein' as how he has less than half of the needed reservations even to begin the design work that's not coming along as hoped.  The FP45 is in the same situation.  The 3-rail market is satisfied, and saturated, with the Lionel and MTH versions of all the above and the 2-rail market is just not large enough to sustain any alone.

Good Day,

Thanks for the overview. I think the price point on the SD40-2 has slowed the ordering down. Scott offers fantastic products but the  price is a big factor. The price on all diesel locomotives from Lionel, MTH, Atlas and 3rd Rail are going to continue to go up as cost of the products continue to go up. I do hope the SD40-2 does get built! I wish Scoot the best!

Regards,

Swafford 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×