Skip to main content

So my local hobby shop has a cosmetically bad but good mechanical shape 2333 F3 for sale, cheap. I'm not worried about the cosmetic issue as I can fix that easily. My concern is performance. I'm wondering how well the 2333 performs vs a 2343. I have a 2343 and it's a nice, smooth, powerful runner. It pulls two F3B units, a dummy F3A unit, and 6 2500 series style aluminum passenger cars with ease. I'm curious if the 2333 would have similar performance/be capable of pulling the same train or if the lack of Magnetraction would hinder it. For what it's worth my layout is flat with 072 curves, so grades and tight curves are not an issue.

Last edited by Lou1985
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I have two 2343's and one original 2333 from 1948.   I have loved the warbonnet engines since I was a little kid.

This 2333 has two motors, magnetraction, and has been pulling like a champ for 50+ years.

20180223_183504[1]

This 2343 is the Lionel repro with the black grabirons, silver trucks, top screens, clear portholes, magnetraction. and is completely and pristinely gorgeous.  Two motors.  You gotta love Neil Young.

20180223_183241[1]

This 2343 has none of the above, one motor.   By far the worst puller, but, still pretty friggin' good.

20180223_183135[1]

All are great.  My experience is the 2333, 1948, is the best puller, and has been for a real long time.....These three are conventional. 

I also have a SF MTH F-3 ABA, and a Lionel LCP SF FT that are command controlled.   Both of those guys are pulling 20 plus cars without issue.  Hard to compare pulling power, but the command speed is (IMO) the best way to go.

Not sure if this helps you...my two cents.

Jerry 

Attachments

Images (3)
  • 20180223_183504[1]
  • 20180223_183241[1]
  • 20180223_183135[1]

Looks like @JerryG has quite the collection. Unfortunately, his 2333 is modified as an original 2333 would not have magnatraction from the factory - I would wager that it has the guts of an original 2343 or similar. His original 2343 with a single motor is also a modification as it would have 2 horizontal motors with magnatraction from the factory. The re-issue 2343 does not compare to the original postwar items in question.

One takeaway here would be to not simply just rely upon the number board on the shell, but to understand what is under the hood so to say.

Last edited by bmoran4
JerryG posted:

I have two 2343's and one original 2333 from 1948.   I have loved the warbonnet engines since I was a little kid.

This 2333 has two motors, magnetraction, and has been pulling like a champ for 50+ years.

20180223_183504[1]

This 2343 is the Lionel repro with the black grabirons, silver trucks, top screens, clear portholes, magnetraction. and is completely and pristinely gorgeous.  Two motors.  You gotta love Neil Young.

20180223_183241[1]

This 2343 has none of the above, one motor.   By far the worst puller, but, still pretty friggin' good.

20180223_183135[1]

All are great.  My experience is the 2333, 1948, is the best puller, and has been for a real long time.....These three are conventional. 

I also have a SF MTH F-3 ABA, and a Lionel LCP SF FT that are command controlled.   Both of those guys are pulling 20 plus cars without issue.  Hard to compare pulling power, but the command speed is (IMO) the best way to go.

Not sure if this helps you...my two cents.

Jerry 

Post war 2343 and 2333 both had dual motors. I'm not sure about the remakes but the postwar both have dual motors. The main difference form what I can see is one has magnatraction (2343 ) and one doesn't. in fact the 2343 was the upgrade of the 2333. There's some other difference like the horns mounting.

Last edited by rtraincollector

Maybe I didn't phrase the question clearly but I just wanted to know if a 2333 is capable of pulling two dummy F3 B units, a dummy F3 A unit (ABBA F3s), and 6 modern 2500 series style aluminium passenger cars. I'd like to assemble that train behind a 2333.

I already have a 2343 that pulls the same type of train that I want the 2333 to pull (I've attached a picture). Basically I want two similar trains, one pulled by the 2343 and one by the 2333, if the 2333 is capable of pulling the train. I'd like to know if it can before I buy the 2333.20180220_210052

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 20180220_210052
Videos (1)
20180218_211616

The 2333 and 2343 weigh essentially the same and the two engines have equal pulling power on level track.  

Magna traction gives the 2343 the ability to pull a heavy train up a grade while the 2333, having no magna traction, will slip pulling the same load up a grade.

As I have mentioned here on the forum before, put a Rail Sounds B Unit behind any Lionel F3  with horizontal motors and you get a  very unique sound.

 Thanks 

Richard

The horizontal motor F3 weighs ~5.3 lbs and the PW FM TM weighs ~5.0 lbs.

I've done lots of pullbar testing, and have seen a huge variation between between the same model of train - like 30-50%. A lot of it comes down to the condition of the wheels.

In my experience, the 2343 (horizontal motor (steeper gear ratio), Magnetraction), pulls a bit better than the FM TM, particularly that the lower gear ratio allows for better modulation of speed (mitigates wheel slippage).

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×