Originally Posted by RockyMountaineer:
OK... after reading that last post by GGG, I'm reduced to just speaking with emoticons right now... namely, . That's about all I can say. WOW...
Originally Posted by GGG:
...
To me this is about integrity of a contract and the risk and rewards of pre-orders. You entered a verbal and or written contract to purchase the train on pre-order. The reward is ensuring you get the train and a price advantage. The shop agreed to provide you the train. Nothing more. This is not store stock, or a sales pitch selling you the product. You asked for it. The risk is that the product may not be exactly to your standards. Your choice, because you recognize the risk and benefit.
So what I see is some who wants the reward of the pre-order without any of the risk. Sound familiar to some of our current economic issues?
So when you hear the product is not what you want, you back out of the deal and leave the shop holding the bag. (To me it doesn't matter if this is a small shop or a large box store).
Did you disclose to the owner that you would not accept the product if it did not meet your standards? Did you explain your standards to him? Did you give the shop the option of weighing the benefits of the pre-order based on your philosophy on product sales? Probably not. You just eliminated your risk, and backed out of a contract.
...
To me this is about right and wrong. G
Why is it that the more you speak about integrity, and what's right and wrong... I feel the need to hold on tighter to my wallet. Thank God my builder made me feel MUCH better that the house he was building for us would actually be the one that was in the plans. I can see it now if he took the position...
Well, you purchased the first home in this subdivision at a great price. I agreed to deliver a home for your family... nothing more. Oh, you mean you REALLY wanted me to build the home that's outlined in your blueprint??? Oh, I'm sorry... we changed our mind about mid-way through the construction because my sub-contractors decided they were over-committed with other projects.
I mean... really... you can't even DEFEND that, and my head is spinning even trying to understand anyone who would even TRY to defend that way of thinking. Downright SCARY when you think about.
Like I said earlier... WOW!!!
Well David you finally got it right....WOW!
BUILDER equals Lionel
Please tell me you don't equate Builder to Hobby Shop?
Please tell me you didn't stick it to your realestate agent for the Builders short falls?
David1 I agree with you but aren't you mixing apples and oranges. A Car dealer that doesn't order the car with the options you specifically order did not fulfill his contract with you. In the O gauge train business the only options are Road Names and numbers. If I provide you the product number you ordered I met my obligation.
If it is damaged, broken, rusty, then you and the hobby shop have recourse to resolve it.
Hobbyshops do take items back all the time. We also have to deal with the long delays in deliverys that have customers decide for various reasons not to take the pre-order. To date, our customer bases has called and "ASKED" not just demanded. In many cases saying if we can't refuse the shipment from the manufacturer or distributor they will take it anyway. We do our best to help our customers. Luckily for us they respect us too.
The Manufacturer is the responsible party here, and that is where this issue should be taken. A few years ago didn't one replace shells that were not the right color? Probably cost them some money, but it was an option, and maybe they had leverage on the Chinese factory, who knows.
Clearly, they can't re-engineer the engine, but maybe if the cry is loud enough directly to them, the can rebate a value, or opt to take it back. Certainly this one has the potential for greater monetary loss for the company. G