Today is the start of the design and construction of version 2 of the PRR Panhandle Division.

Here is the blank canvas.

IMG_1019IMG_1020

The Prototype - Background & History

This layout is my second attempt to model the 7 miles of the PRR Panhandle that ran through the northern panhandle of West Virginia and Steubenville, OH. The Panhandle was a second mainline of the Pennsylvania Railroad that ran from Pittsburgh to St. Louis.  It existed from 1848 through 1995.  Grif Teller immortalized the double track bridge across the Ohio River in the painting “Crossroads of Commerce” which appeared in the 1953 Pennsylvania Railroad Calendar.  That bridge still stands and the track using it serves Weirton Steel (now Arcelor Mittal) and the brick refractories and businesses on the New Cumberland secondary.  Unfortunately from Weirton Junction through Burgettstown and points east, the track has been pulled up and the right of way has been converted to a hiking / bike trail.

I grew up in Weirton, WV in the 1950s & 1960s. I left in 1978, but still have family and other ties in the area. The PRR double-track bridge at MP 42.11 was always a source of fascination for me, even as a small child going to Steubenville with my parents and grandparents. However, it was not until I saw Teller’s painting (in the late 1990s) that I realized what I wanted to model.

 

Vital Statistics of the proposed Layout:

  • Size & Shape:  Folded dog bone – 11’ x 39.5’.  There is an 11’ x 7.5’ staging yard behind the eastern backdrop.  Total dimensions are 11’ x 47’ (517 square feet).
  • Track:  Mostly GarGraves with some Curtis sectional curves, Curtis Hi-Rail turnouts, and Ross Custom Switch turnouts.
  • Yards:  Weirton Junction, Weirton Steel, Coal Mine Spur, Staging.
  • Command System:  TMCC. Turnouts have Z-Stuff DZ-2500A & C switch machines and are both TMCC and pushbutton controlled.
  • Wiring & Blocking:  8 power districts will be supplied from 1 centrally located power distribution panel. Home run wiring will be used.
  • Power:  A number (TBD) of Lionel 180 watt PowerHouses will supply power to districts 1-8. Two (2) K-Line PowerChief 120 transformers will power switch machines, lights, and some AC accessories.  All DC accessories, building lights, traffic signals and street lights get their power from various 3VDC, 5VDC, and 12VDC power supplies.
  • Signals:  Z-Stuff DZ-1060 PRR position signals (4) & MTH PRR signal bridges (2).  The layout is only signaled for travel in the counter-clockwise direction.

 

Differences between Version 1.0 and Version 2.0

I feel that the increase in size (primarily length) will contribute to a more accurate representation of the area.  Panhandle 1.0 was an ambitious design crippled by limited space.  Panhandle 2.0 is similar in its major design aspects, but the additional space will allow those features to be separated by scenery.  My intention is to avoid crowding layout elements and give a real sense of distance between the features.

 

Construction Goals:

  • Select a uniform height (48”) that facilitates working underneath comfortably.
  • Avoid grades and take steps to make track as issue-free as possible.
  • Make the fascia, table tops, and legs as attractive as possible; use high quality wood and stain exposed components. Plan for layout skirting.
  • Minimize the use of cookie cutter subroadbed.
  • Make aisles wide enough for comfort and provide space for seating at least a dozen people. 

 

Operational Goals:

  • Allow the simultaneous operation of at least 3 trains on the mainline and up to 3 switchers in yards or spurs.
  • Use a signaling system that prevents collisions.
  • Have curves large enough to permit the use of the largest PRR locomotives and scale passenger cars (requires O72).
  • Permit the running of long trains (10-20 hoppers or 8 passenger cars).
  • Allow operating sessions to take place.


Electrical Goals

The Panhandle was originally conceived (back in 1997) as a conventional layout (a tip of the hat to Rich Melvin for his help on conventional electrical blocking ).  In 2005, I decided to install TMCC, but was influenced by the arrival of DCS.  After trying a DCS/TMCC combination during construction, I decided TMCC was the direction to pursue.  In 2007, the change was made to solely TMCC.  Home run wiring and light bulbs (as block power indicators) were retained in the design.  The electrical plan divides the layout into 8 blocks or power districts – 4 mainline and 4 yards - with the ability to individually control power to the yards.  The mainline (districts 1-3) and yards (districts 5-8) are all command controlled.  District 4 (River Route) will be operable in either command or conventional mode.

  • Eliminate multiple power distribution panels.
  • Simplify and improve labeling for all wires.
  • Make use of 2-color zipcord where practical.
  • Improve wiring reliability and crimping techniques.

 

Much more detail to follow, but those are my goals and thinking as I take the first steps down the road.

As always, your thoughts, suggestions, and questions are welcome.

George

Attachments

Images (2)
Last edited by G3750
Original Post

Oh, I'm with you and eager to see updates!  I'm sure your modeling will be an inspiration for me, as I also model PRR but not any specific locale.  I never knew until tonight the location for the Grif Teller painting, of which I have a lithograph.

Joel

RETINPA posted:

Oh, I'm with you and eager to see updates!  I'm sure your modeling will be an inspiration for me, as I also model PRR but not any specific locale.  I never knew until tonight the location for the Grif Teller painting, of which I have a lithograph.

Joel

Joel,

I grew up looking at that bridge.  My late father walked across it as a boy. 

George

George,

What a pristine space for your new layout!  Thank you for all the background information to refresh memory and add too what you wrote in the previous version.  Yes I think the additional length of the layout will allow you to do better justice to the original plan!  

Since you have photos of the room, have you taken position of the house yet?  Of course I know you will be busy with moving, getting settled, and a host of other tasks in the near future!

I am looking forward to seeing the new plan and how construction develops!  I hope to be able to see it firsthand since you won't be very far from me.

Mark Boyce posted:

George,

What a pristine space for your new layout!  Thank you for all the background information to refresh memory and add too what you wrote in the previous version.  Yes I think the additional length of the layout will allow you to do better justice to the original plan!  

Since you have photos of the room, have you taken position of the house yet?  Of course I know you will be busy with moving, getting settled, and a host of other tasks in the near future!

I am looking forward to seeing the new plan and how construction develops!  I hope to be able to see it firsthand since you won't be very far from me.

Mark,

I'm up to my *** in alligators, but here's a photo of the house taken on Friday (move-in day).

IMG_1027

And I'll invite you over when we are not totally surrounded and done going crazy.

George

Attachments

Images (1)
Scale City Designs posted:

George what a great space you have! Can't wait to see what you are going to do to fill it, make sure you keep posting.

Thank you, Marty!

It's my plan to keep posting.  Hope everyone will "like" the topic.

George

G3750, Congratulations to you and your wife for building such a beautiful home and even better a Fantastic Train Room.  The pictures are so good and Your Plan of action sounds so promising...We wish you the best of fun, safety, and Pleasure of building your New Dream Layout....Please keep us updated as to your Progress and ideas.  This will be an Adventure we want to be part of...Thank You. IMG_7901

Attachments

Images (1)

Updated 5/11/2017:

Yesterday, I rechecked the dimensions of the room and discovered that the terrain differs from the map, so to speak. The left half of the room is actually 13'8" wide, not 14'.  At 20'10" from the left wall, it narrows to be only 12'8" wide all the way to the right wall.  So, I am currently tweaking the layout a bit to fit those dimensions while retaining adequate (3' wide) aisle space along the front of the layout.  Fortunately, the general shape of the layout will be preserved.  This will work!

Another change to the track plan involves the addition of a hidden run-around loop in the Weirton Steel area.  This will allow a switcher to pull a load into the mill and then escape.

Updates to the track plan are coming soon.  This unpacking and setting up the house is really getting in the way of working on the layout! 

George

What would a layout be without the requisite tweaking?  I think that's why most of us love the hobby. Happy to follow along with you on 2.0

Andy

Last edited by Steamfan77

Andy is right.  I thought our daughter's room was 12 x 12.  Once she moved everything out and I could measure accurately, I found I was 8" off in one direction and 6" off in another; hence 130 sq ft.  Take as much time as your wife will let you getting settled in, and you can refine the plan in the meantime 

Andy and Mark, you're right!

Measure twice, cut once!

And when the map and the terrain differ, believe the terrain! 

George

Steamer posted:

went by this a few minutes ago....

PTDC0016PTDC0018

I walked across this bridge many times as a boy. I would just stand still when a train would go by panic stricken about the possibility of falling into the river but excited and mesmerized at the same time. That was back in the 80's when Conrail was still around.

Add Reply

Post
OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
330-757-3020

www.ogaugerr.com
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×