Skip to main content

MTH 20-98291 ABB Schnabel car (First appeared in: 2001 Volume 3)

 

This model is a very close replica of the ABB PTDX 201 14-axle Schnabel car. The prototype was originally built for Westinghouse (WECX 201).

 

The O scale model includes an authentic looking power transformer load.

 

20-98291

 

Note: Alterations to this model need to be made to improve tracking.

 

 

 Prototype and model photos are attached. The model photos show the car before any modifications. See later mods.

 

PTDX 201

Formerly WECX 201

Light Weight

300,000 lbs.

Capacity

750,000 lbs.

Number of axles (33" wheels)

14

Empty Car Length

78' 6"

Maximum Loaded Length

108' 10"

 

 

PTDX 201 PROTO 1

PTDX 201 PROTO 4

PTDX 201 PROTO 5

 

PTDX ABB PROTO 2

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 1

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 2

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 3

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 4

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 5

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 6

Attachments

Images (11)
  • 20-98291
  • PTDX 201 PROTO 1
  • PTDX 201 PROTO 4
  • PTDX 201 PROTO 5
  • PTDX ABB PROTO 2
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 1
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 2
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 3
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 4
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 5
  • MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 6
Last edited by pro hobby
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I like the Schnabel cars - few people have ever seen one, so it's fun to run one at a toy train museum open house. Here's one behind a very anachronistic 3rd Rail SP Mikado. Just ran it this way for fun. You have to watch the side clearance on these things. This one cleaned out a trackside signal the first time I ran it at the museum. There's a protrusion on one side; I flipped the car end for end and it cleared fine.

 

The car in the photo is for sale, if anyone is interested. E-mail in my profile.

 

3rd Rail Mikado and Schnabel 1

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 3rd Rail Mikado and Schnabel 1

I've got the (W) version of the MTH model.  Way, way back when, and I rode about a mile on the real one back when it was (W).  This is a good model of it and  a rather cool car to have.  Also nice to bash - I had a second one I used as the basis for a carriage for a giant railway gun -- all those wheels -- a lot of fun to build.  

An excellent idea. And, if you have a good-sized collection of MTH rolling stock, the RB trucks are probably free because you probably have a couple of cars that MTH put RB trucks on that should have Bettendorfs! Just find what they are and swap them out. The couplers are easily switched. 
 
Originally Posted by pro hobby:

Changing the Bettendorf trucks on the MTH schnabel.  The prototype photos show Roller Bearing types were used. The attached photo shows the MTH schnabel model modified with roller bearing trucks.

 

 

Added "drawbar" when connected without a transformer load.

 

Shown is a connected schnabel that uses a removable "drawbar" to connect the two sections.  This greatly improves running characteristics. 

 

The drawbar is only used when no load is attached. The drawbar attaches to each 3 axle truck. When this car is included with other cars in a train consist all the pulling force is applied through the drawbar and 3 axle trucks.

 

 

000_3589

000_3591

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 000_3589
  • 000_3591
Last edited by pro hobby

Other than the number is there any difference between this MTH WECX 212 made in 2012 and the WECX 203, the first MTH Schnabel made in 2000?  In other words has MTH made any changes to the design?

 

Also, attached is another video of a Schnabel car running.  The Schnabel in this video is the WECX 203.  Also note the different shade of blue on the last 2 cars in the train which are K-Line.

 

Bill

Attachments

Videos (1)
2015-01-07 010
Last edited by WftTrains
Originally Posted by pro hobby:

Reviewing the MTH 20-98291 ABB Schnabel car (First appeared in: 2001 Volume 3)

 

This model is a very close replica of the ABB PTDX 201 14-axle Schnabel car. The prototype was originally built for Westinghouse (WECX 201).

 

The O scale model includes an authentic looking power transformer load.

 

20-98291

 

Note: Alterations to this model need to be made to improve tracking.

 

 

 Prototype and model photos are attached.

 

PTDX 201

Formerly WECX 201

Light Weight

300,000 lbs.

Capacity

750,000 lbs.

Number of axles (33" wheels)

14

Empty Car Length

78' 6"

Maximum Loaded Length

108' 10"

 

 

PTDX 201 PROTO 1

PTDX 201 PROTO 4

PTDX 201 PROTO 5

 

PTDX ABB PROTO 2

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 1

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 2

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 3

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 4

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 5

MTH 20-98291 ABB SCHNABEL 6

I admit--I'm blind as a bat and illiterate; where is the review?

Originally Posted by WestinghouseEMDdemoguy:
Pro Hobby, your color match on the supports is superb, what brand of paint did you use and what was the formula? I do auto paint and collision work so I am well versed in mixing ratios but I am new to painting model trains.  Thnximage

The new paint is a mix of two shades of blue.  I use acrylics from Michaels crafts.

Last edited by pro hobby
Originally Posted by WftTrains:

Other than the number is there any difference between this MTH WECX 212 made in 2012 and the WECX 203, the first MTH Schnabel made in 2000?  In other words has MTH made any changes to the design?

 

Also, attached is another video of a Schnabel car running.  The Schnabel in this video is the WECX 203.  Also note the different shade of blue on the last 2 cars in the train which are K-Line.

 

Bill

This is the same design as the original issue. However my model has been modified to improve tracking and stability.

 

I have completely disassembled the car to make modifications to improve the performance on curves. The first objective was to add weight to the bottom of the transformer load. The transformer comes apart after the 4 bottom screws are removed. Weight was added to the transformer to lower the center of gravity.

 

The chassis is held together with various screws. I removed the screw that holds the hydraulic control box to the "porch".  With this screw removed the top "porch" can be separated from the cast metal frame. The upper assemblies which attach to the transformer load are held in place by a Philips head screw at the "pivot" point. I removed this screw and next I removed the small screw that retains each "porch" assembly. (I did not replace this screw since it appeared that it was restricting rotation at the "pivot" point.)

 

Next I added a small custom made piece made from wood and installed this within the metal casting to provide better support at the "pivot" point.  Before I re-assembled the car I also used a small round file to burnish the opening in the metal casting where the upper assembly is attached. I checked to see that these assemblies would freely rotate side to side before completing the assembly. Finally I replaced the "bettendorf" style trucks on the model with roller bearing types. With these modifications and changes my MTH model negotiates O-72 curves and turnouts without any problem.

 

When operating the schnabel "without transformer load" I use a separate "drawbar" which attaches directly to the 3-axle trucks.  

 

Last edited by pro hobby

I have the original Westinghouse, and until this thread forgot all about it.  I do remember a thread (years ago) where more than one person claimed their cars suffered stress cracks from the transformer loads.  I think the cracks developed in the plastic hooks or near where the hooks (clasps) are located on the cars.  Actually, that's why I put the car back in its box and buried it somewhere.  I just did the same with my Weaver troop cars, rather than watching them bust apart one by one from zinc rot.

 

Rich

Originally Posted by pro hobby:
Originally Posted by WftTrains:

Other than the number is there any difference between this MTH WECX 212 made in 2012 and the WECX 203, the first MTH Schnabel made in 2000?  In other words has MTH made any changes to the design?

 

Also, attached is another video of a Schnabel car running.  The Schnabel in this video is the WECX 203.  Also note the different shade of blue on the last 2 cars in the train which are K-Line.

 

Bill

This is the same design as the original issue. However my model has been modified to improve tracking and stability.

 

I have completely disassembled the car to make modifications to improve the performance on curves. The first objective was to add weight to the bottom of the transformer load. The transformer comes apart after the 4 bottom screws are removed. Weight was added to the transformer to lower the center of gravity.

 

The chassis is held together with various screws. I removed the screw that holds the hydraulic control box to the "porch".  With this screw removed the top "porch" can be separated from the cast metal frame. The upper assemblies which attach to the transformer load are held in place by a Philips head screw at the "pivot" point. I removed this screw and next I removed the small screw that retains each "porch" assembly. (I did not replace this screw since it appeared that it was restricting rotation at the "pivot" point.)

 

Next I added a small custom made piece made from wood and installed this within the metal casting to provide better support at the "pivot" point.  Before I re-assembled the car I also used a small round file to burnish the opening in the metal casting where the upper assembly is attached. I checked to see that these assemblies would freely rotate side to side before completing the assembly. Finally I replaced the "bettendorf" style trucks on the model with roller bearing types. With these modifications and changes my MTH model negotiates O-72 curves and turnouts without any problem.

 

When operating the schnabel "without transformer load" I use a separate "drawbar" which attaches directly to the 3-axle trucks.  

 

Pro Hobby: 

 

Thanks for the information that the newer MTH Schnabel cars are the same design as the earlier ones. 

 

Those are very interesting and useful modifications you have made.  But a modification that IMO is really needed is one that would enable a user to remove and reconnect the transformer load without taking the entire car off of the track.  Re-railing those cars with each of the 6 trucks trying to go in different directions at once is not fun! 

 

Bill 

 

Originally Posted by Smoke Stack Lightnin:

I have the original Westinghouse, and until this thread forgot all about it.  I do remember a thread (years ago) where more than one person claimed their cars suffered stress cracks from the transformer loads.  I think the cracks developed in the plastic hooks or near where the hooks (clasps) are located on the cars.  Actually, that's why I put the car back in its box and buried it somewhere.  

Rich

PH's modification below addresses that concern:

 

"When operating the schnabel "without transformer load" I use a separate "drawbar" which attaches directly to the 3-axle trucks."

 

---PCJ

Originally Posted by pro hobby:
Originally Posted by WestinghouseEMDdemoguy:
Pro Hobby, your color match on the supports is superb, what brand of paint did you use and what was the formula? I do auto paint and collision work so I am well versed in mixing ratios but I am new to painting model trains.  Thnximage

This is the original MTH paint.

I think he's talking about what was used to paint the support blocks you added to the chassis. If that too is 'original MTH paint' I'd imagine he wants to know where you got it

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×