Skip to main content

Every catalog release I see complaints that there is not much that is actually new or not made before.  Complaints about Hudson's, Big Boy's, F-3's, etc.  Over the years I have learned what the popular engines and road names are and lucky for me, they are the ones I like.  I also feel lucky to see a lot of LIRR and Strasburg stuff which I consider more specialty than mainstream.  So let's answer the question....what has not been made yet....that would actually sell??  Three people looking for an obscure engine to be built is never gonna happen.  What is it that you think the masses want that has not been delivered??  Cause I am pretty sure that if there was a great demand for something, wouldn't someone be making it??  So...what is it??  Thanks...BigRail

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

In thinking about items that have never been made in O gauge, different folks have different areas of interest.  I will limit my comments to motive power. 

 

I think there is a large group who have a clear preference for steam.  So, they will want those steam engines that have not been made before.  I'm sure there are many, many that haven't been made.  I'm not a steam guy  so I don't know if there are a few that most steam guys could agree on.

 

There is another group who prefer diesels.  I count myself in this group, and I am sure it is much smaller than the steam fans.  I think there are many diesel fans who would like to see some of the older diesels that haven't yet been made.  Personally, I would like to see Lionel and MTH try to keep up with modern diesel engines.

 

I'm sure there is another group who are primarily interested in electric engines.  I suspect this is an even smaller group.  I have no idea what their preferences would be.

 

And, slicing the hobby a different way, there are many folks who are interested in particular railroads.  Whether it is steam, diesel, or electric, they want to see every piece of motive power that that railroad has ever run made in O gauge.

 

Of course with the small size of O gauge railroading and concerns about it continuing to get smaller, unfortunately, I don't think we will many, if any, new O gauge engines of any type that would involve the investment in new dies.

 

I'll shut up now.

My top choice for a steam locomotive that is not currently made and would sell well enough to make a profit is a high-quality scale Baldwin 4-6-0 from the turn of the century era (1890-1910). These engines were ubiquitous on branch lines right up to the end of steam, functioning as dual-purpose power for way freights and commuter locals. There is nothing available in this category now. The current Ten-Wheelers are either too modern (Lionel), made from a PRR prototype with a Belpaire firebox and therefore unsuitable to be decorated for other railroads (MTH Premier), toylike and lacking in detail (MTH Rail King), or a low-priced item that is good value but not satisfactory if you want a nice scale engine (Williams). 

 

Here's a photo of what I'm talking about. The tall stack, high domes, uneven wheel spacing, skinny boiler and sharply tapered firebox are typical of the era. This picture happens to be a Milwaukee Road engine, but Baldwin and others cranked out hundreds like it. I'd buy one and I think a lot of other steam fans with small layouts would too. 

 

sk264

Attachments

Images (1)
  • sk264

Oh, boy...I could get tired of typing a long list.....but the only way that can

be proven is to actually offer them in the market place.

I will second the C&O K series...BUT didn't somebody (Lionel or MTH) offer the Pacific

equivalent and very few were sold?  You want a deposit?

The cancelled MTH McKeen car...several people have claimed they wished they had

signed up for one and got it produced.  I did. It wasn't.  Deposit?

Seen that G scale Mack railbus in the Orange Hall?  I'll sign up for a three rail O scale

model (hey, make it in two rail, also). Deposit?

Edwards small gas electrics were once all over the place....I want one.  Deposit?

These may not be much in demand elsewhere, but I want separate sale Vanderbilt

tenders in three lengths.  I'll take mine with coal, SP fans may want oil.  I'll take

at least two of each length, the longest on three axle trucks, but I'd live with it if

the mfr. of the C&O K had sense enough to offer separate sale extras of its tender.

I think that three rail O should get one, at least, scale model of a side door caboose..

how about an ATSF version like was sitting on the ground at Rhyolite ghost town in

Death Valley?  Lotsa people like the Santa Fe.

In the tourist-trap gift shops in Gatlinburg and Pigeon Forge down in Smoky Mtn.

National Park, you could probably sell out a run of the Little River Logging 2-4-4-2

loco.  Just tell the tourists they are driving on roads that once carried the rails that

loco ran on.

On and on...etc., etc.

I think there is a possibility that new dies will be made even in this economy.  People will get tired of the same old molds all the time and just stop buying.

 

I do believe that whatever model the manufacturers make in at least the near future will have to be usable for many different roads.  For steam, a new model of a USRA design that was popular with several roads might get traction.  I don't think we will see my most wanted engine, a Lionel Legacy PRR T1, anytime soon because it just has too small a fan base.

 

Same for diesels.  An engine not yet made in O gauge that was used by many roads could get built.  Something used by the PRR in the late 40s would be nice

 

For me, I could live without new models for now while the hobby sorts itself out.  I would like to see the re-release of currently produced models in additional road names not yet used.  As a Pennsy fan, how about Lionel producing its Legacy E6 steamer in PRR post war paint, or any manufacturer releasing its latest F3 iteration in the correct PRR freight scheme.   I don't think I ask for too much

This is turning into another wish list of what do you want Lionel (or other manufacturer) to make.  If you really look at the original post, the question is being asked about what would actually sell.  Heck, if anyone knew what the correct, exact answer really was, they would be soon at the top of the manufacturing pyramid.  

So let's answer the question....what has not been made yet....that would actually sell??

EMD Gp40-2 phase II

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...40-2#Original_buyers

GE B23-7

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GE_B23-7

GE u25c

http://www.thedieselshop.us/GE%20U25C.HTML

GE B36-7

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GE_B36-7

ALCo C636- The Last Big Century [PRR]PC, CR, IC, UP, Demo, CN, Cartier, NYSW, DL&W

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A..._636#Original_owners

Ace 3000!

http://locomotive.wikia.com/wi...ype_Steam_Locomotive

 

 

Last edited by prrhorseshoecurve

 I would recommend turn of the century scale locomotives of 4-4-0 American,4-6-0, and 2-6-2 Prairie. Hundreds of each of these locomotives were made and some continued operating until the end of the steam era.

 These locomotives could run on small (tight turn) layouts and large layouts. They could run on more layouts so the customer base would be larger. Because they are smaller comparatively(to a big boy) they would have a lower price point. The small size could be used on ready to run sets too.  Baldwin used the same boiler on different types of engines so a 4-4-0 and a 4-6-0 model could use the same mold in the manufacturing process.

  A small locomotive on a small layout appears to make the layout larger. A large locomotive on a small layout appears to make the layout smaller.

  Most of the small steam locomotives came in a flat black with engine numbers on the loco and road name on the tender. In the MTO (Made to Order) business model and modern graphics about any road name could be produced instead of the popular five names. This would be a great selling point for MTO.

 

Douglas 

I believe Southwest Hiawatha's idea of a TOC Baldwin 4-6-0 is a good one. I'm afraid that the cost would appear too high for most people. The appeal of the WBB 4-6-0, with its faults, is that it is inexpensive.

Maybe the best idea for a good seller would be a nice, modest-sized, dual purpose loco.
3rd Rail has stated that they would do limited runs of more obscure locos, but they don't come cheap.
A loco that might really be a winner is a USRA Heavy Mike. According to the MR Cyclopedia, 23 roads used either original or copies of this, from East to West. An enterprising manufacturer could milk a model for years with different details, tenders, road names.
Not so thrilled with a Heavy Mountain-a pretty rare beast. Ditto with the 2-10-2 in both weights.
There was a comment about the lack of sales for the Lionel C&O F-19. Here's my take: Except for PRR, I stay away from passenger power because it requires appropriate passenger stock, costly and hard to find accurate models. (I am in for a 3rd Rail/GGD Columbian, however, and I have the Weaver Reading Crusader). For me, repaints of the same-old, same-old cars don't cut it.
I would not be surprised if others feel the same way. But I'd bet a C&O K-class would sell. It could absorb all those MTH 2-bay hoppers.

Last edited by rex desilets

I think there is more of a big market for detailed, feature-laden scale models of smaller steam locos.  Maybe its just me, but the Legacy Atlantics and 0-8-0s and Premier 2-8-0s and 4-4-0s are some of my favorites - just fantastic locos.  done right, they are little jewels of models and they will fit and run on a lot of layouts where the big boys, so too speak, never will: there is a big market.  In particularly, there were a lot of interesting locos in that size range made in the three decades around the turn of the 19th-20th century, leading up to WW1.  A manufacturer would probably have to put them out on the market and let word-of-mouth gradually spread about how appealing they were, but I think once that happened they would sell well and consistently for a long time. 

 

Then again, I would love to see a Soviet AA20-1 4-14-4 steamer - you can never have to many drivers -- but then that probably is just me . . . 

I also see a bunch of previous "wish-lish" items without any explanation of why the poster thinks it will sell in sufficient volumes for the manufacturer to make.

 

I think the consensus of all Atlas/MTH/Lionel is that articulated sets of 3 or 5 cars won't sell.  After all, MTH never re-ran that 5-car spine set from a long time ago.  They'll probably never make back the money invested in the tooling of the 5-car twin stacks.

Does it have to be a locomotive or rolling stock?

 

I would really like to see a TMCC talking station that interfaced the LCS track sensors. It could Identify the passenger consist, called out the name train and make station anouncements. Also one that would interface the older station sound diners would be nice.

The station could have night ambient lighting, interior lighting with arival boards that change. 

large or small station size designs would have the same electronics in it.

You could even have an operational semaphore or block signal system that monitor trains arriving or leaving.

backgound motor traffic noise, smoke out the chimney, boarding calls, the whole nine yards.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I would love to see more scale diesel locomotives from the Southeast - ACL, SAL, SCL and Southern Railway. While these have been made by Atlas, Lionel and MTH, it seems to me they have sold very well or out. Manufacturers in general have shied away from the southeast in all scales, and are quick to cancel orders (HO Genesis SCL Fs are a good example). 

 

With the MTH F-7, Lionel F-3 PH 2 and F-7, it is possible to make good affordable correct models of ACL, SAL and Southern using current molds. Lionel has offered some nice southeast roads in their current catalog, but with BTO they might not get enough orders.

 

My two models that I really want to see would be Lionel SAL F-3 PH 2 and MTH green Southern F-7. 

 

As for new molds, a correct scale ACL R-1 4-8-4 (also used on RF&P) and the ACL K15s 4-6-0 (like the 250 or 1031). I would even like to see a good standard consolidation 2-8-0 that could easily be kitbashed for Southern and other southeastern roads.

How about smaller diesels? The upcoming GE 44 tonner is great, but I sure wish MTH would have made it one of their 2-rail/3-rail convertibles. There's also the 45 tonner with side rods and the GE 70 tonner, that Bachmann already offers in HO, so they already have the prototype information on file. I also would like to see a CF7, which could be done in many shortline schemes, as well as the Santa Fe, in both cab types. Another personal favorite of mine is the GE U18b, which is a compact, yet husky looking locomotive.

 

I'm still waiting for an updated B&O Docksider with PS3. Does anyone know if either MTH or Lionel is looking into the "Keep Alive" technology already offered in DCC? It seems like an idea that could also be applied to either DCS or TMCC.

 

Bill in FtL

Good Day,

 

Why Intermodal cars and equipment will sell?...............because people young and old see these cars on the rails and railroad intermodal facilities everyday! Many people model what they see here and now in the 21st Century. Prototypical as well as fantasy schemes would sell.
 
Regards,
Swafford

B&M Gunderson 3-Unit Set V1XX

CN Gunderson 3-Unit Set V4X

MKT Gunderson 3-Unit Set V OneX

Attachments

Images (3)
  • B&M Gunderson 3-Unit Set V1XX
  • CN Gunderson 3-Unit Set V4X
  • MKT Gunderson 3-Unit Set V OneX

Honestly a low nose GP9 would sell very well and many Railroads from Class 1's to short lines had them. For completely new tooling a B30-7, and B36-7 would sell very well because there are no company in O-Gauge has yet to produce them and a decent amount of Railroads owned them.  Steam locomotive wise a nice small scale 2-6-2, 4-4-0, or 4-6-0 would do well because it would be relatively affordable compared to some of the large steam locomotives and it would be good for smaller layouts. 

Originally Posted by Bob Severin:

This is turning into another wish list of what do you want Lionel (or other manufacturer) to make.  If you really look at the original post, the question is being asked about what would actually sell.  Heck, if anyone knew what the correct, exact answer really was, they would be soon at the top of the manufacturing pyramid.  

That's what I am seeing as well.

 

It is very common in this hobby, and especially on OGR Forum for someone to say, "if they would make this, everyone would buy one!"

 

I always wonder how people know this.   The answer, of course, is they don't. It's all anecdotal based on what their few buddies in the club say.  There's nothing wrong with that.   However, for the big guys, making lesser known items is a huge risk.

 

I think the only way we will see Lionel or MTH make some of the things that have been listed in this thread is if they make everything on a Built To Order basis, and not just the unique high dollar stuff.

 

As an example, there's some cool stuff listed in this thread, but so far nothing I would rush out to buy.

 

The big question here should be not whether it would sell, but whether the item would continually sell over a period of several production runs, which the manufacturers need just to break even on the development and tooling costs. They have ALL said it, and this plays heavily into the decision making process.

 

The Jersey Central loco on the first page might sell out one single run. But they need more than that. How many other roads actually owned that loco? And would folks into scale fidelity buy that loco in roads that never had that model engine?

 

I agree with Swafford that there is interest in intermodal stuff. But for young and old, you NEED affordable semi-scale that will run on 027 curves as well as the scale offerings. And folks might not like hearing this, but the semi-scale offerings would probably way out-sell any scale ones.

 

This is the dilemma the train makers face. In the small 3-rail market, where the majority is STILL traditional semi-scale, how to make everyone happy and still stay in business? 

 

And there is a real disconnect between what many would like to see made in 3-rail and the reality of what would sell. I heard someone yell a question to Mike Wolf on why MTH doesn't make this particular road, and his answer was fast and simple: "It doesn't sell."

 

Many wonder about the pitiful selection of O scale decals. Microscale at one time had an extensive line of 0 scale decals. They don't now because the 0 scale didn't sell - and that's from the owner of Microscale. Meanwhile the offerings of N scale and HO scale decals could make an 0 scale guy just drool. While I can't imagine putting decals on an N scale car, obviously people do it, because Microscale continues to offer more and more N scale decals.

Maybe that's cuz all the slam-dunk, huge-appeal items have been done to death?
 
I am suggesting that all the toy-train stuff has been made and modern, scale stuff is all that is left to do...
 
Originally Posted by david1:

I have not seen one thing on this post that would have general appeal with allot of us train buyers. Mfgs. Need a broad range of buyers for a product that they have to make new tooling for. 

 

I would like to see them upgrade their present tooling for better detailing, etc.

 

Last edited by Martin H
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit. I'm convinced an Auto Loader would sell - train guys like cars too, and it would be a great addition to any transition-era freight train.

 

 EvansAutoLoader

K-Line made one.

klineal

Rusty

Attachments

Images (1)
  • klineal
I like the idea of a new more detailed B&O scale class C -16 0-4-0T. It has always been a popular model in the smaller scales. Barney first made one in the 1940's in HO scale. MTH made a Railking O scale one in their early days but an update without the ridged wheels would be great.

I would love love to see a GE 70 tonner.
A 1890's style open sided excursion car like the "Hello Dolley " car at Strasburg (or Disneyland)or open sided trolley would be great.
A New York or Chicago Elevated Forney 2-4-4F would be amazing because a lot of these were later used in mining ,industry and logging RR's
Originally Posted by Putnam Division:

I have always liked the Baldwin baby faces.....I'd even get one in a fantasy scheme. Who had them besides the CNJ?

 

Peter

Peter:

 

The double ended units were unique to the CNJ. There were several types of single cab A units with a somewhat similar profile built for a number of roads.

 

Bob 

 

BABY1

BABY2

BABY3

BABY4

BABY5

Attachments

Images (5)
  • BABY1
  • BABY2
  • BABY3
  • BABY4
  • BABY5
Last edited by CNJ 3676
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit. I'm convinced an Auto Loader would sell - train guys like cars too, and it would be a great addition to any transition-era freight train.

 

 EvansAutoLoader

K-Line made one.

klineal

Rusty

 

Yes they did, and I have one. That is a semi-scale car; it's about the right length but a bit narrow. I had an awful time finding cars other than Volkswagens, Corvettes, and '55 T-Birds to put on it. Top-down convertibles look pretty silly on a Auto Loader; you don't rail ship a new car with the top down. 1/43 cars are too big to fit six full-size sedans on the K-Line Auto Loader. I even tried 1/64 cars but they were too small to fit in the wheel tracks. I finally settled on half a dozen 1/43 Eligor '62 Corvair coupes. Cost me a bunch, buying them one at a time off eBay. I'd still like to see a scale Auto Loader with full-size, scale sedans of the correct period. And I think it would sell. I'd buy two or three if they came with different cars.

Well I'll take 2- C&O K-3/3a with both 6 axel tenders, rectangular and Vandy.

 2- C&O Hudsons #300 w/elephant ears, and #314. Yep, that'll bout do it!...........Brandy

 

P.S. By the time these would ever get made, Bachmann will probably have eleminated the compitation with their "Blue Tooth Electronics", or they maybe calling it "Gold Tooth", as the bucks they will have made by then.If so I want these electronics installed in these engines.

 

A good point. The accessory I would like to see is figures dressed correctly for the 1920's through 1950's, including the hats that both men and women wore back then. You need men in period suits and fedoras, and a few flappers would be nice for the 20's. And I think they would sell because there are a lot of steam era modelers out there. Figures dressed in jogging suits don't do much for a steam era layout.
 
Originally Posted by Paul Kallus:

The hobby gets inundated with trains and rolling stock every year, much of it with more detail and features, yet I find there's few if any comparable accessories, mainly buildings that compliment the trains.

 

Last edited by Southwest Hiawatha

I agree that well-painted steam-era figures are sadly lacking.

Also, flat fronts for various structures for small layouts and to fill areas on a background. And not just brick and city buildings, either. Nobody seems to make rural wood factory structres as flats. Lots of them as 3D buildings, though. I need a long one and decided to build my own, but I would have spent some money on a good flat kit for a long wooden industrial structure. That could be used from early steam to the modern eras...

Every time I respond to one of these "I wish they'd make"'s, I know I am wasting my

time.  The guy who runs the O scale March Meet in the Chicago area collected NYC

Hudsons, and had a wall of them in his now closed shop.  Not sure how many of them

that was, but I know more variations have been ginned out, so I know there is probably somebody out there that could top that.  However, I converted my Marx

#1829 Hudson into a Mikado.  I just do not have any interest in "Hudsons", even if

by other names such as that assigned by the C&O.  But I am sure many, many more variations will be forthcoming.  I am just not sure why.  I am also sure I ain't buyin'

n'air'n.  I will keep nibbling around the edges until something new and different and

interesting is made, then race in and grab one, to quickly retreat back to the edges

while the machines keep stamping out doughnut holes.

Hmmm...interesting - it seems that the Baldwin Baby-Face keeps getting play. I've

wanted one for years, especially since:

 

- My 2 favorite RR's had versions: GM&O and NYC

- The super-funky CNJ double-ender has cried out for an O-gauge version forever

So, how about biting the bullet L or M (and it would almost certainly be M; too bad, as I like

TMCC, but I'd buy) and producing the B-B, A1A and twin-cab versions (Two-Face?) of the Baby-Face in proper and not-so-proper road names?

 

The Centipede is a Baby-Face, you know - I bought that (NdeM).

 

========

 

MORE IMPORTANTLY (and I'm looking at you, Weaver, since Lionel grabbed the Heavy Mikado):

NC&StL streamstyled J-3 4-8-4 Dixies.

 

I'll take one of each version - a Stripe and a Yellowjacket

 

====

 

Oh, and: NYC K-5 Pacific (a K-3 or K-14 would be nice, too)

             NYC H-10 Mikado 

 

I agree with Rusty and Southwest on this as well:

 

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit.

 

Lionel already has a suburb flat car as a starting point. All this is needed is the super-

Structure and or course the correct autos.

 

In my brief research, it seems that this might have been a one-off prototype, maybe someone can confirm or correct me. Still, I think this is very visual-centric car that would be welcome on many layouts.

 

Charlie

There are some really good suggestions here.  I absolutely agree with the below.
I didn't realize that there was a lack of appropriate period figures.  I just assumed they were out there.  These need to be made and I can't believe given the popularity of the era(s) that this has been neglected.  There has to be a demand for these.  BigRail
 
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
A good point. The accessory I would like to see is figures dressed correctly for the 1920's through 1950's, including the hats that both men and women wore back then. You need men in period suits and fedoras, and a few flappers would be nice for the 20's. And I think they would sell because there are a lot of steam era modelers out there. Figures dressed in jogging suits don't do much for a steam era layout.
 
Originally Posted by Paul Kallus:

The hobby gets inundated with trains and rolling stock every year, much of it with more detail and features, yet I find there's few if any comparable accessories, mainly buildings that compliment the trains.

 

 

This is an interesting question.  Thinking about it some more, I think I have a home run, or at least a triple for someone.  If I were RMT, I'd invest in the tooling to make a plastic body for the current BEEP and BEEF chassis that was a scale model of the Brookville DES-70B, also known a decade ago or so as the BL-600 or something like that.  

 

I think a ot of us would buy it, because we like and respect RMT and let's face it, a scale model diesel switcher, this cute, at RMT prices? Yessir!

 

 

Brookville DES-70B

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Brookville DES-70B

"Smart" 21st Century Diesel Maintenance Facility
Building!

Technology and Innovations have always caught my eye. That
said, I would suggest that Lionel produce a "Smart" 21st Century Diesel
Maintenance Facility Building.

Legacy features:
1. Open and close
the doors with Cab-1 or Cab-2.

2. Turn exterior and interior lights on
or off with Cab-1 or Cab-2.

3. Enter Id’s into Legacy Cab-2 what Diesel
or Steam locomotives are assigned to their scheduled maintenance and have
announcements from the Maintenance Facility or Roundhouse when the engines need
to be serviced. “Engine 1988 Scheduled Maintenance today track one”, kind of
like a Locomotive Maintenance Management System. The Service check could be
programmed for 30, 60 or 90 days. This would make for a great reminder to look
your engines over for traction tire issues, lubricate gears, check for loose
wires, and a general maintenance check just like the real deal. If you wanted to
service all your engines in 1 session, then you could enter a code that would
make an announcement of all your engine ids one at a time every 5 or 10 minutes
until you have acknowledge the engine has been serviced. At the end of the day
you could enter a code that would check all the engines in inventory that have
been serviced and announce “All engines serviced next scheduled maintenance in
30 days”.

The Maintenance Facility could even make announcements for
staging your Diesel or Steam locomotives for sand, water and fueling. “Engine
1982 Track two clear for fueling”. A two stall modern building would look
fantastic. A roundhouse would be colossal!

Regards,
Swafford

According to Wikipedia, only two prototypes were built, one for the New York Central and one for the Union Pacific. Here's a picture of the UP version, a bit less stylish than the NYC one. The auto racks built by Evans to fit inside boxcars were also called Auto Loaders. 
 
It's a pain trying to Google the Auto Loader because there are very few articles on it and they are overwhelmed by the references to the Lionel version.
 
 Evans UP Auto Loader
 
Originally Posted by Charlie:

I agree with Rusty and Southwest on this as well:

 

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit.

 

Lionel already has a suburb flat car as a starting point. All this is needed is the super-

Structure and or course the correct autos.

 

In my brief research, it seems that this might have been a one-off prototype, maybe someone can confirm or correct me. Still, I think this is very visual-centric car that would be welcome on many layouts.

 

Charlie

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Evans UP Auto Loader

I would definitely buy a tinplate PE, a Tropicana reefer, a scale, modern diesel switcher and a highly detailed Atlantic (I have one Atlantic from Lionel).

 

But what about the commuter trains that run everyday in our communities?

 

I would be a sucker for a scale set of SEPTA silver liners (literally, my backyard growing up) or a set of the light rail cars that run throughout the Denver metro area (just outside my office window as I write).  I am personally too young to wax nostalgic over yet another covered wagon (no offense intended).

 

Tooling costs are probably prohibitive, but then again, this thread assumes new tooling.

 

I'd like to think there are a lot of people like me that yearn for replicas of the very trains they take to work today.

 

 

Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit. I'm convinced an Auto Loader would sell - train guys like cars too, and it would be a great addition to any transition-era freight train.

 

 EvansAutoLoader

K-Line made one.

klineal

Rusty

 

Yes they did, and I have one. That is a semi-scale car; it's about the right length but a bit narrow. I had an awful time finding cars other than Volkswagens, Corvettes, and '55 T-Birds to put on it. Top-down convertibles look pretty silly on a Auto Loader; you don't rail ship a new car with the top down. 1/43 cars are too big to fit six full-size sedans on the K-Line Auto Loader. I even tried 1/64 cars but they were too small to fit in the wheel tracks. I finally settled on half a dozen 1/43 Eligor '62 Corvair coupes. Cost me a bunch, buying them one at a time off eBay. I'd still like to see a scale Auto Loader with full-size, scale sedans of the correct period. And I think it would sell. I'd buy two or three if they came with different cars.

Being a Corvair owner, I'd like to see that load.

 

Unlike you, Evans didn't seem to have a bias towards any one manufacturer.  Hudson, Dodge, Packard, Chevrolet, Kaiser and Mercury, all represented in the pic.

 

Prototype or not, I'd enjoy having more than one of those in scale on my layout.

 

Bruce

Last edited by brwebster

All the new light rail lines popping up in cities around the country.  These are the only trains some kids are going to relate today as the country increasingly becomes more urbanized.

 

And monorails, gondola/cable cars.  Many people in this hobby are only active around Christmas time and are looking for fun things to make their Christmas layouts even more animated.  Lionel has done a great job so far with things like the Candy Cane commuter train and some of the trolleys, but so many people who put up a Christmas village are looking for gondola systems.  And they could model it on a real system that people identify with that exists so even the more serious modellers would want to use it on their layout.

 

Also, if it hasn't been done before, a cog railway system like the one going up to Pike's Peak.

Last edited by towdog

I don't want anybody to take this wrong but I would love to have an O-scale version of Hitlers WWII armored train engine/tender and consist of armored cars.  I saw a glimpse of it in the American Heroes Channel.  No, I am not a Nazi.  I just dig cool trains and that Armored train was a really interesting piece of equipment.  I don't collect European trains but would like to own this one European train, if MTH would make it in PS3.  

 

P.S., I do collect and operate O-scale military trains of WWII and modern vintage and have a couple of different US Army consists.

Last edited by ptalar
Originally Posted by Swafford:

"Smart" 21st Century Diesel Maintenance Facility
Building!

Technology and Innovations have always caught my eye. That
said, I would suggest that Lionel produce a "Smart" 21st Century Diesel
Maintenance Facility Building.

 

I would definitely be interested in something like this.  But, I have 2 concerns:

 

1. How big would it have to be?

2. How much would it cost? Never maintain cash savings again

As I look at all these suggestions, it's obvious how everyone enjoys the hobby and what they'd like to have on their model railroad.

 

But who is to say that some of the suggestions would not sell?  It may not be true for some items "that everyone would buy one".  But just because someone doesn't like a suggestion doesn't mean "that no one will buy it" because "it does not appeal to me".

 

We'd probably have a better chance of getting items we like in the future, not only discussing it here but by contacting your favorite or all manufacturers of your preferences. If they notice  enough requests for an item they make want to make them.

Originally Posted by brwebster:
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:
Originally Posted by Rusty Traque:
Originally Posted by Southwest Hiawatha:

Here's another one that would sell: the Evans Auto Loader from the early 1950's. The manufacturer would also have to come up with some 1/48 autos to put on it, since 1/43 cars won't fit. I'm convinced an Auto Loader would sell - train guys like cars too, and it would be a great addition to any transition-era freight train.

 

 EvansAutoLoader

K-Line made one.

klineal

Rusty

 

Yes they did, and I have one. That is a semi-scale car; it's about the right length but a bit narrow. I had an awful time finding cars other than Volkswagens, Corvettes, and '55 T-Birds to put on it. Top-down convertibles look pretty silly on a Auto Loader; you don't rail ship a new car with the top down. 1/43 cars are too big to fit six full-size sedans on the K-Line Auto Loader. I even tried 1/64 cars but they were too small to fit in the wheel tracks. I finally settled on half a dozen 1/43 Eligor '62 Corvair coupes. Cost me a bunch, buying them one at a time off eBay. I'd still like to see a scale Auto Loader with full-size, scale sedans of the correct period. And I think it would sell. I'd buy two or three if they came with different cars.

Being a Corvair owner, I'd like to see that load.

 

Unlike you, Evans didn't seem to have a bias towards any one manufacturer.  Hudson, Dodge, Packard, Chevrolet, Kaiser and Mercury, all represented in the pic.

 

Prototype or not, I'd enjoy having more than one of those in scale on my layout.

 

Bruce

As a Corvair owner I applaud the choice of a Corvair-only auto carrier load

 

Jeff C

 

A lot of great, cheap, simple technology has yet to reach the O scale world. How about: 

 

- A universal Bluetooth wireless system with two components: A thing you connect to the track and a thing you hold in your hand. The Liontech remotes/MTH Remote Commanders are the right idea, but how about one for conventional operators that works with any transformer and any engine?

 

- Wireless remote cranes and loaders. These already exist in not-quite-the-right-sizes. I think treating the train as part of an RC stuff-handling system would really attract attention from new potential customers. Play value is still the name of the game IMO.

 

- Undecorated USRA steamers - cheap ones - with free software for printing your own lettering, logos and numbers.

 

My $.02,

Alan P

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×