Skip to main content

Hi Folks,

 

A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned that I was exploring how I might work Lionel's new LCS Sensor track into a new Atlas-O layout without doing any surgery to the LCS track itself -- not that that's a bad approach... I just didn't want to go that route, especially if there was a way to interface an LCS Sensor track untouched.

 

I knew Atlas-O made rail joiners that transitioned from Atlas-O track to Lionel tubular.  And I knew Lionel made a transition track designed to link Fastrack with tubular.  So that was essentially my plan... namely, to use purely stock items available from most dealers carrying Lionel and Atlas-O track -- with the two caveats being the resulting arrangement would be both functional and esthetic.  On the esthetics front, I wasn't looking for perfection -- just something that was pleasing to the eye and didn't stand out as something too kludgey.

 

So here we go... here's a photo of the LCS Sensor track with Fastrack-to-Tubular transition pieces on either side:

 

0001_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor

 

I was intrigued by Rossbed (available for Ross and Atlas-O track) by Ross Custom Switches, after seeing it at York a couple of years ago.  I liked the way that the Atlas-O track would actually "fit" into the custom-milled Rossbed roadbed pieces.  So I purchased a few straight pieces to see how it would work in this environment.  As luck (or design ) would have it, the rail profile (height and width) when placing an Atlas-O piece of track in Rossbed matched PERFECTLY with the Lionel Fastrack transition pieces.  All I needed to do was trim a small section of Atlas-O's plastic tie-bed so the Atlas-O track would butt up directly against the Lionel Fastrack transition piece using the Atlas-O tubular rail joiners (Atlas-O part #6095).  Here's how things looked at first glance:

 

0002_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor

 

Note that although the rail profiles matched PERFECTLY, the roadbed itself did not... which was actually not a huge problem at all.  As observable in the above photo, the Rossbed is slightly lower and narrower than the Fastrack roadbed.  But not so much so that a little ballast covering couldn't mask the discrepancy.  So before ballasting, I spray-painted the Rossbed with a flat granite/gray.  The color was not critical -- just a neutral color so the light color of the Rossbed foam wouldn't be visible beneath a thin ballast coating.  (See below)

 

0003_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor

 

Next I used Woodland Scenics "Gray Blend B1395" coarse ballast over the painted Rossbed, and here's a close-up of how things looked right at the transition to the Fastrack:

 

 

0004_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor

 

Here's more of an aerial view as well...

 

 

0005_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor

 

Perfect?  No.  But workable for me?  Absolutely!  And better than I had hoped.   Yes... it's true that the real ballast has more texture/granularity than the imitation ballast that's integrated into Fastrack.  But the difference wasn't so stark to be objectionable as a showstopper... at least not to my eye.  What do other folks think?

 

Anyway... just thought I'd share this approach for those folks who are thinking of building a new layout based on Atlas-O track and also want to incorporate Lionel's LCS Sensor technology without doing surgery to the Sensor track.  Obviously, if you've already laid Atlas-O track on an existing layout with different roadbed, then this approach may lose some or all of its merit... and you may find doing some LCS Sensor track surgery is a better approach for you.  

 

In my case though, I'll soon be starting fresh with plans that include two loops of O-Gauge track as part of a combined O-Gauge and Standard Gauge layout.  And the Rossbed product will definitely be part of the bills-of-material when it comes to laying the Atlas-O track. 

 

David

Attachments

Images (5)
  • 0001_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor
  • 0002_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor
  • 0003_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor
  • 0004_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor
  • 0005_Rossbed_AtlasO_LCS_Sensor
Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I was going to suggest adding ballast to the Fastrack, but it'll be somewhat time consuming.  The ties don't protrude like they do for the Atlas track on the roadbed, so you'll have to carefully "paint" it around each tie.

 

One thing you could do to minimize the length of Fastrack is to remove the Fastrack pins from the sensor track and mate it directly to the Atlas track using the Atlas to tubular track pins.

 

Last edited by gunrunnerjohn
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

I was going to suggest adding ballast to the Fastrack, but it'll be somewhat time consuming.  The ties don't protrude like they do for the Atlas track on the roadbed, so you'll have to carefully "paint" it around each tie.

 

One thing you could do to minimize the length of Fastrack is to remove the Fastrack pins from the sensor track and mate it directly to the Atlas track using the Atlas to tubular track pins.

 

I've found it best to just ballast the sides and lightly weather between the ties. It takes too long to ballast between the ties for the reasons you mention gunrunnerjohn.

 

I used that method on this section:

 

Branch_Example

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Branch_Example

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×