Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Alfred E Neuman posted:
DM&E_Bobby posted:

I wonder if anyone can identify the engine on the Signature cover? LOL

LOL indeed.  Did any steam locomotives besides turbines have radiators?

What, me worry?

looks to be a collage of locomotives... name an engine that had compound air pumps on the front of the locomotive?

the T1 had a radiator grille on the front of it?

 

J Daddy posted:
Alfred E Neuman posted:
DM&E_Bobby posted:

I wonder if anyone can identify the engine on the Signature cover? LOL

LOL indeed.  Did any steam locomotives besides turbines have radiators?

What, me worry?

looks to be a collage of locomotives... name an engine that had compound air pumps on the front of the locomotive?

the T1 had a radiator grille on the front of it?

 

Great Northern "flying pumps" on their 4-8-4's and heavy 2-8-2's.  Chesapeake and Ohio had them on 4-8-2's and 4-6-2's.  Seaboard had them on 2-8-2's.  Northern Pacific on their 4-6-6-4's.  UP on the 4-12-2's.

There's probably more, but that's off the top of my head.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

I'm almost insulted!  that someone posted that picture as a sneak peak (as if we couldn't tell).  They could have just made an announcement that AC9 is in the new catalog.

Now, will they do a DAYLIGHT scheme like they did with the cab forward (that i thought was stupid at the time, and now I think its the coolest thing ever and want one!).  

Super O Bob posted:

I'm almost insulted!  that someone posted that picture as a sneak peak (as if we couldn't tell).  They could have just made an announcement that AC9 is in the new catalog.

Now, will they do a DAYLIGHT scheme like they did with the cab forward (that i thought was stupid at the time, and now I think its the coolest thing ever and want one!).  

Maybe that's not the big surprise so they just showed it.  Maybe I'm too optimistic  BigRail

 

I am tired of the re-issues!

 

Here's my challenge, and I'm serious about this. If everyone is tired of reissues, come up with a steam locomotive that has not been tooled up by either manufacture that can justify a $150,000 to $250,000 tooling investment in one or two runs. 

In my opinion the days of steam locomotives that were real world low number builds or that only served a few roads are over for Lionel and MTH. 3rd Rail can and will continue to pull those off, but the market is shrinking and odd ball locomotives just are not going to cut it any more. The risk vs reward just is not there. A hot seller like the SD60E is a no brainier for new tooling, but again, find me a steam locomotive that can justify a significant tooling investment that can be recovered in one or two runs. 

The gauntlet has been thrown, now let's hear some suggestions. 

Last edited by Notch 6

The O Scale Exterior-Braced 50' Double-Door Boxcar needs to be made again as a 3-rail/2-rail car with roller bearing trucks and wire grab irons. 

They still have not done the authentic markings for real railroads such as Western Pacific early 1970's, Western Pacific 1979, Southern Pacific HYDRA-CUSHION, McCloud River Railroad, and others.

wp38141bgd

Andrew

Attachments

Images (1)
  • wp38141bgd
Last edited by falconservice
Notch 6 posted:
 

I am tired of the re-issues!

 

Here's my challenge, and I'm serious about this. If everyone is tired of reissues, come up with a steam locomotive that has not been tooled up by either manufacture that can justify a $150,000 to $250,000 tooling investment in one or two runs. 

In my opinion the days of steam locomotives that were real world low number builds or that only served a few roads are over for Lionel and MTH. 3rd Rail can and will continue to pull those off, but the market is shrinking and odd ball locomotives just are not going to cut it any more. The risk vs reward just is not there. A hot seller like the SD60E is a no brainier for new tooling, but again, find me a steam locomotive that can justify a significant tooling investment that can be recovered in one or two runs. 

The gauntlet has been thrown, now let's hear some suggestions. 

Then how bout making them a little better . Like the s3 or t1 recently. So I guess I will never see a legacy Mohawk l4?  I guess will I buy a mth one then ..

 
Then how bout making them a little better . Like the s3 or t1 recently. So I guess I will never see a legacy Mohawk l4?  I guess will I buy a mth one then ..
 

I think both camps do try to make them better with each reissue, and yet that's still not enough for some folks. 

The base tooling exists for a Lionel Mohawk, so not out of the realm of possibility.

My question is find something that is completely new tooling from the frame up that fits that criteria that I mentioned above. My guess is that there are going to be very few responses.  

Disclaimer: I am not aware of all the steam locomotives that Lionel have produced in scale.

Doing a little web searching, I found a multitude of railroads owned 2-10-0 Decapods and several are still on display. That tooling could be used for a few runs to cover all roads. 

I would think that it might require wide radius curves, which could narrow market share. 

Notch 6 posted:
 

I am tired of the re-issues!

 

Here's my challenge, and I'm serious about this. If everyone is tired of reissues, come up with a steam locomotive that has not been tooled up by either manufacture that can justify a $150,000 to $250,000 tooling investment in one or two runs. 

In my opinion the days of steam locomotives that were real world low number builds or that only served a few roads are over for Lionel and MTH. 3rd Rail can and will continue to pull those off, but the market is shrinking and odd ball locomotives just are not going to cut it any more. The risk vs reward just is not there. A hot seller like the SD60E is a no brainier for new tooling, but again, find me a steam locomotive that can justify a significant tooling investment that can be recovered in one or two runs. 

The gauntlet has been thrown, now let's hear some suggestions. 

LS&I 2-8-0.  Could be offered in Grand Canyon, LS&I, San Luis and Rio Grande, Western Maryland (734), and Ohio Central.

Notch 6 posted:
...  In my opinion the days of steam locomotives that were real world low number builds or that only served a few roads are over for Lionel and MTH. 3rd Rail can and will continue to pull those off, but the market is shrinking and odd ball locomotives just are not going to cut it any more. The risk vs reward just is not there. ...

Lionel was never in the business of producing low-number production runs.  Of course, we can argue what constitutes a "low number".  At the end of the day though, Lionel loved giving the IMPRESSION that some locomotives were built in low numbers.   But I'm not convinced Lionel EVER produced low quantities of anything -- at least not in the way 3rd Rail does.  Scott Mann is the only producer of O-Gauge product that truly builds to CONSUMER reservations today.  And when reservation numbers don't meet required minimums, the project is either cancelled or delayed until more reservations are obtained.  We've occasionally heard where one or two "consumers" have reportedly ordered multiple 3rd Rail units "in quantity" (i.e., 10 or more) in order to push a given project's reservation number(s) over the top.   So those consumers essentially acted as a pseudo-dealer to make the project happen.

After several cycles of BTO products, Lionel still has a dealer community that sustains the company's BTO program by ordering "extra's" (beyond actual consumer pre-orders).  If Lionel relied solely on consumer orders, I suspect some of the the company's product wouldn't get made either.

David

Last edited by Rocky Mountaineer

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×