Skip to main content

prrjim posted:

Danger Lights is a good look at steam power in the 30s or 40s.   I understand it was filmed on the Milwaukee road.    Lots of good steam scenes that I remember, but it has been a long time.    The plot was very 30s and the acting very exaggerated as all movies were in those days.   

Another to add to the list is Breakheart Pass.    Filmed on a narrow gauge line.   

Breakheart Pass was actually filmed on the standard gauge Camas Prairie RR with Great Western #75.

Phil McCaig posted:

I have to vote for "The Train" with Burt Lancaster.  The man did all his own stunts and did a fine job playing the WWII  part of a French manager who knew all aspects of the operation from yardmaster to mechanic to running a steam engine and outsmarting the Nazis while doing all those trades and even finding time for a little romance. Like any movie it's all make believe but for entertainment value this one is hard to top.

I will set my vote for that one to.

mlavender480 posted:
prrjim posted:

Danger Lights is a good look at steam power in the 30s or 40s.   I understand it was filmed on the Milwaukee road.    Lots of good steam scenes that I remember, but it has been a long time.    The plot was very 30s and the acting very exaggerated as all movies were in those days.   

Another to add to the list is Breakheart Pass.    Filmed on a narrow gauge line.   

Breakheart Pass was actually filmed on the standard gauge Camas Prairie RR with Great Western #75.

I liked that movie very much.Only I noticed the locomotive was a lot bigger than your wood burning steam locomotive.But that is o.k. its still a great movie.

What about the recent "The Lone Ranger" movie starring Johnny Depthcharge and Arm & Hammer?  Those incredible film sequences of a couple of old 4-4-0 Americans EACH pulling a string of 24 or more 60' and 80' long baggage cars, combines, and coach cars through the mountains are just the absolute ultimate in realism  and believability , aren't they??? 

Mixed Freight posted:

What about the recent "The Lone Ranger" movie starring Johnny Depthcharge and Arm & Hammer?  Those incredible film sequences of a couple of old 4-4-0 Americans EACH pulling a string of 24 or more 60' and 80' long baggage cars, combines, and coach cars through the mountains are just the absolute ultimate in realism  and believability , aren't they??? 

For all wood mock-ups, yes.

 

Mixed Freight posted:

What about the recent "The Lone Ranger" movie starring Johnny Depthcharge and Arm & Hammer?  Those incredible film sequences of a couple of old 4-4-0 Americans EACH pulling a string of 24 or more 60' and 80' long baggage cars, combines, and coach cars through the mountains are just the absolute ultimate in realism  and believability , aren't they??? 

A much better use of the real thing, models, CGI and a better story:

Rusty

 

Hot Water posted:
Berkshire posted:

The Polar Express is one of the most memorable train movie I remember watching, I know it's new, but man is that movie good.

Except,,,,,,,,,it isn't "real", i.e. it was mostly all computer generated.

Psst....most of these movies aren't "real" anyhow.   

The #1225 is a real loco. It is a movie. What are the "operating no no's" (besides ice skating in a Berk and such)

  Where does it seem like it might be correct, but really isnt; if it's just an operational rivet count?      Or if easier, were was it correct?

 

Last edited by Adriatic
Adriatic posted:

Psst....most of these movies aren't "real" anyhow.   

The #1225 is a real loco. It is a movie. What are the "operating no no's" (besides ice skating in a Berk and such)

  Where does it seem like it might be correct, but really isnt; if it's just an operational rivet count?      Or if easier, were was it correct?

 

I can't really understand what you're trying to say ("Operational rivet count?" "were was it correct??" Huh??), but...Polar Express is a CARTOON. I'd much rather see a train movie with a REAL TRAIN in it. You know, not computer generated?

smd4 posted:
Adriatic posted:

Psst....most of these movies aren't "real" anyhow.   

The #1225 is a real loco. It is a movie. What are the "operating no no's" (besides ice skating in a Berk and such)

  Where does it seem like it might be correct, but really isnt; if it's just an operational rivet count?      Or if easier, were was it correct?

 

I can't really understand what you're trying to say ("Operational rivet count?" "were was it correct??" Huh??), but...Polar Express is a CARTOON. I'd much rather see a train movie with a REAL TRAIN in it. You know, not computer generated?

Oh, I don't know.  Lemony Snicket had a pretty good CGI T1 in it, although I wouldn't classify it as a "train movie," greatest or otherwise:

There was another scene with the T1, but I can't find it on YouTube.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×