Skip to main content

Has anybody received the latest Legacy Ten Wheelers?  Any pictures to post?  Admittedly, I know nothing about the artwork or prototype of the custom runs that were recently posted.  But, my spidey-sense is tingling that the dreaded battleship gray/auto primer smoke boxes and fire boxes have come back around. Maybe the color is purposeful for these two particular models. Maybe it’s the lighting from the video. I have another road name on order and am hoping they’ll have the graphite smoke/fire boxes as illustrated in the catalog. Again, if you have pictures of any of the new Legacy Ten Wheelers, I would appreciate if you would post them. Many thanks ahead of time.
38BAE14E-1612-473F-83AA-24BD661DF332

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 38BAE14E-1612-473F-83AA-24BD661DF332
Last edited by Rider Sandman
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

From what I've seen, your spidey sense may not be wrong. Theres video of the NKP on youtube and its the same color.

I've also seen that light grey color on most if not all of the recently delivered Northerns.

Its mind boggling really. For 15 or so years Lionel used pretty much the same dark graphite for the smokebox.

What happened?

Heres a snapshot of locos I have. Spanning from the 2002 j3a, on the far left, to the 2015 heavy Mike on the right.

The heavy Mike is a "tad" lighter, but is still perfectly acceptable IMO.

001

002

Oh and I also used to own one of the previous run Legacy F12e's . It was also the same color.

( Solid runner, I should have kept it)

083

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 001
  • 002

I’m a little curious if this’ll be a thing on the other recent LEGACY steamers will have this color gray, too.

As far as I remember, this color thing didn’t really become an issue until 2018 with the silver smoke box 2-8-0’s.

I think though the new 2020 light Mike’s have the more accurate graphite gray, or at least the Southern 4501 does, but don’t quote me on that.

I was actually considering the Black custom run B&O that is shown above but passed on it for precisely that reason. My backup plan is to pick up the NYC version if they didn't mess it up with the awful primer color. I'm anxiously awaiting an image of the NYC so I can pull the trigger. What a shame if they mucked it up and I have to pass on that one too. I know Muffins has some or had some. He's usually great about posting actual product photos so hopefully we will know something soon. I passed on the H10 also for the same reason. Looks really bad IMO, I don't really care if it's prototypical or not.

BTW, nice lineup RickO!

Last edited by Randy_B

Great line up Rick.

It is unfortunate that they seem to be using way too much light gray. Most engines seem to have changed to sparkle light gray which sort of reminds me of battleships. As a kid I built a bunch without painting a drop of paint on most save the tan decks. That changed when I got the giant Missouri and used a ton of paint to get the color scheme right. Besides three different grays, there was steel, bronze, silver and a few others. Yeah, the waterline, and the bottom red too(forgot those).

If these steam engines had the gritty graphite colors, they should on the models. Why get the spray paint can of light gray out and slap that on the engine where it don't belong? Ugh!

I just unboxed my Rutland. Mind you I have 3 Northern Pacifics that have re lettered into Rutlands. Everyone is dead on about the smokebox color being what looks like light gray primer. Actually the Rutland featured a very dark smokebox. The original dark gray I would still paint over. The class lights now feature clear lenses. I’m not a fan of glowing LED’s on steamers. If the green can be shut off with the remote fine. If not. They will be unplugged like the majority of my steamers.

Well they got the black right. When I ordered it. I kind of new the lettering would be white. That’s how the Mogul was. The Rutland’s lettering was more of a silver or aluminum. My other 10 wheelers are lettered with Highball Graphics decals.  They deal with discriminating modelers and I’m sure they got it right. Lionel seems to have got the font right. It’s just not stretched out enough. I really didn’t want to do a re letter job. I was hoping weathering might fix it. I run these a lot as doubleheads so it’s going to stand out from the others. At some point when it’s out of warranty I’ll re do it. I have a re done NP that’s already numbered 79. I may leave that as is. Switch out the headlights and renumber the new one.

I only ran it a few feet. The start up sounds are new. If your into smoke. It’s a good one and plenty comes out the whistle. A few issues cosmetically if your into the prototype. For the money. Pretty reasonable with it’s features considering what other engines are selling for.

What got my curiosity was the Alco builders plate. My NP’s are Baldwins. The Alco is correct for the Rutland. Not sure of the other models in this run as far as builders plates. Do these vary from one run to another. Seeing the indent in the shell houses the builder plate they are not interchangeable.

@RickO posted:

Seems like when MR left, he took the graphite smokebox paint code with him....

They got it right on the 1297 4-6-6T not too long ago. I really gripes me when, like with the VIsion Niagara, you open up the box thinking it's going to look like the catalog photo and instead of the joy you expected, you're first thought is, "I'd like to get this thing repainted."

It looks like you can get the green class light housings from Lionel if you want them but that doesn't fix the paint. I guess I will try to pick up a 1258 - at least you have that one already. Thanks for the info. Do the lights look like your other steamers once they are on now? I assume the photo is from before you reset them to default.

@NYC Fan posted:

Not really liking the gray.  Can't imagine who or what is making these horrible paint decisions. Here's the new one.

IMG_6036

And here's the older one which I like much better.

29433146_10216601049878256_6866733437273767936_o copy 2

SMH

Yeah, like they stopped at the first coat. I know some paints(room paint) always comes out lighter the first coat, so you need a few, but this is just downright ridiculous. Almost like they didn't mix up the paint. Really makes me sad.

I saw the NKP ten wheeler in the flesh yesterday. It’s definitely battleship gray. Ugh. It sticks out like a sore thumb against the backdrop of every other Legacy (or Premier) steamer (like Rick’s awesome lineup above). The shame is Lionel otherwise did a fantastic job with it - Steve put a ton of effort in his design and it is awesome with all the whitewalls and so forth from the prototype photo.

It’s maddening this continues to go on.  It also seems to be some releases and not others. If you flip through Mr. Muffins latest email, the ten wheelers and their auto primer paint are at the top, yet scroll down and Steve has other Legacy stuff for sale with the perfect graphite paint. It really is a roll of the dice.

My guess is Harry is building a paint mask for the ten wheelers.....

This does raise an interesting thought: are we here on the forum just a small vocal minority about these constant paint screwups and, for the most part, everyone else just shrugs and keeps buying without even lodging a complaint?  It seems like at some point if enough people were pizzzzed, it would get fixed. I refuse to believe this is hard to fix - they apparently just don’t want to or don’t feel the need to.

To the extent anyone is taking a poll, I would certainly vote to take the time used to make 2 or 3 of the Facebook shows and direct it toward fixing paint colors.

@NYC Fan posted:

I just put my NYC 1232 on the track and programed it in. The classification lights came on white and I can't seem to change them to green. I hit the AUX2 button and held it and no lighting menu came up. Am I doing something wrong?

If you haven’t already figured it out just simply press the classification light “on” button again to change the color. Same goes with the one with “T” in it for the tender lights

It must have something to do with the Mr. Muffin's Trains exclusive version. That is what the artwork for that one called for, and I think that's what confused the factory on the smokebox color.

I don’t think that’s true. Every road name that has surfaced so far has the same battleship gray paint. The two special runs from Pat’s at the top of the thread, Skip’s NYC version, etc - they all have it.  

[snip]

This does raise an interesting thought: are we here on the forum just a small vocal minority about these constant paint screwups and, for the most part, everyone else just shrugs and keeps buying without even lodging a complaint?  It seems like at some point if enough people were pizzzzed, it would get fixed. I refuse to believe this is hard to fix - they apparently just don’t want to or don’t feel the need to.



While it doesn't change the fact that far too many Lionel engines are arriving with wrong paint schemes, this post (on 4/17/21) by 3rd Rail's Scott Mann indicates that unless someone is onsite to oversee the painting process, 3rd Rail's factory will not correct paint issues.

@sdmann posted:

Hi Folks,
[snip]

I'll tell you a little story of how I usually check all these paint schemes and roads.

I go to China, and after a few days of getting my bearings, they have a desk for me at their office in the small assembly factory. They present me painted samples of shells, which I  hold, and  look at them, and google pictures of prototypes, and review our data for the road name. I use my years of experience of seeing good and bad color matches, and I instruct the factory make changes and corrections on the spot.  We have a color library that we refer to when there is a question of accuracy. Some times it take 4 trips to the painter (downstairs) to get the color spot on. I usually am there through the most critical parts of production to catch not only their errors, but ours.

Now, after being stuck here, I get digital photos of color matching with samples chips. I get engine by engine views of each side, front and back and sometimes the tops of the finished models. It's too late to correct color variations as they tell me, "Everything is already painted". It's too late to correct detailing errors, "Everything is already assembled". When I see pictures of these models they are basically finished.

[snip]

I believe this is the situation Lionel has found themselves in with their factory/factories and unless Lionel decides to have someone onsite overseeing the painting process, the incorrect paint colors will continue.

Last edited by GregM
@Mikado 4501 posted:

I’m a little curious if this’ll be a thing on the other recent LEGACY steamers will have this color gray, too.

As far as I remember, this color thing didn’t really become an issue until 2018 with the silver smoke box 2-8-0’s.

I think though the new 2020 light Mike’s have the more accurate graphite gray, or at least the Southern 4501 does, but don’t quote me on that.

I think your timing estimate is about right - my first recollection was a 2018 special run NKP #757 Berk. All of the Berks, including it, showed up with the auto primer noses. Fortunately, there was a pre-order waiting list, so I was able to pass on mine without hurting the dealer.

I also think you’re correct on the latest Mike’s. There is another thread and they look great. It truly is a roll of the dice which makes it all the more frustrating - they clearly know how to do it right when they are paying attention.

@GregM posted:

While it doesn't change the fact that far too many Lionel engines are arriving with wrong paint schemes, this post (on 4/17/21) by 3rd Rail's Scott Mann indicates that unless someone is onsite to oversee the painting process, 3rd Rail's factory will not correct paint issues.

I believe this is the situation Lionel has found themselves in with their factory/factories and unless Lionel decides to have someone onsite overseeing the painting process, the incorrect paint colors will continue.

I think it’s a little different in Scott’s case versus the recurring problem on Legacy steamers. Every project Scott does is a specialty one-off and highly detailed. I 100% understand why close up and hands on monitoring is needed.  In this case, Lionel should be using the same color (graphite) on everything irrespective of the model or release (unless the box isn’t supposed to be graphite, of course). The point is, they should be able to get it right and repeat it - these aren’t one-offs - it should be the same thing over and again.

Also, inherent to this line of reasoning is that it’s actually the factory’s fault and not the designer putting paint codes on the drawings. Given how sloppy the editing is in the catalog, shipping schedule inaccuracies, etc, are we entirely sure the problem is “on the other end?”

It must have something to do with the Mr. Muffin's Trains exclusive version. That is what the artwork for that one called for, and I think that's what confused the factory on the smokebox color.

Thing is the Hudson Mr. Muffin's ran had the right colors for the artwork, and Lionel okayed it. So it is the factory that is messing up the colors, much like the Polar Express awful colors, the weird off colors of everything that comes out that is supposed to be red, be blue, be green, they're all off what they should be. I was amazed that the Clown Challenger came out with the correct colors that the catalog had(or dang near close). So, someone is not doing something right with the paint, and there are no sample colors being looked at which is why we keep getting this mess. It's almost like Elf and the book Buddy's dad okays with two pages missing so the story doesn't make a lick of sense. What gives, right?

I didn't take a "before" picture, but it was a really ugly light gray.  You can see some blurry images of the same model here.

I'm not sure how durable the Neolube is. I think it's just graphite in an alcohol suspension, so it might come off with handling. But it's pretty easy to pick up the engine without touching the smokebox. And probably pretty easy to slather on more if it wears off.

Last edited by Professor Chaos

Despite the wrong color one the smokeboxes, does anyone have the Reading & Northern version. I'm sure that one may not have this issue with the smokebox color since it's black.

Got the Reading & Northern 4-6-0 today from Charles Ro. Smokebox is black! I was worried when I was unpacking it. The blue seams fine also. Here's a few photos:

readingF

readingG

readingH

readingJ

readingK

Attachments

Images (5)
  • readingF
  • readingG
  • readingH
  • readingJ
  • readingK
@MELGAR posted:

Does the Neolube wear off or is it permanent? Does it come off when handled? Very dissatisfied with Lionel over this.

MELGAR

It does come off... but, it doesn't come off from handling it.  I use it to blacken the center rail on atlas track.  I touched a few sections up 3 or 4 months ago and they are still very dark... so its pretty durable.

If you watch the full video, as it comes into direct lighting, it’s the same battleship gray as the other road names.

Rider,

Yes and I thought your two B&O looked fine as well. However you are the one who bought the engines and you do have the right to be disappointed with the gray color of the smoke box. They are not as bright as the silver smoke boxes of earlier engines for me I would be happy that I got a Legacy engine for under $700 bucks, has great sound, smoke and a steam whistle too. However that grey paint is an issue for you......too bad but look at the bright side there are ways of darkening it if you are really that upset. Good luck with the engines happy railroading.

JohnB

Thanks, JohnB and you truly have a good and reflective perspective. To be clear, I didn’t buy the C&O versions, but did another road name. I have a great dealer who is gonna make it work. In truth, I’m frustrated because it’s a lingering problem that should be easy to fix, but you’re right, it certainly isn’t the end of the world. Have a good one.

Last edited by Rider Sandman

I'm a big fan of the NYC Putnam Division, known as the "Ol' Put," and the new 10 Wheeler was a must have. I also collect photos of the Put, especially color photos. I would have liked Lionel to have used graphite paint on the smoke box, but there was apparently several shades in different photos. Very hard to tell what lies under the soot dirt and grime on some of these babies. Looking at #1274, I'd have to think this started out somewhat lighter.

NYC F12e

Yorktown Heights on Putnam Division

Most thought Lionel did a good job on the previously issued #1258. I didn't hear any complaints.

29433146_10216601049878256_6866733437273767936_o copy 2

A shade or two can make a big difference in our perception. Lionel should pay more attention to this detail. But, I am enjoying this locomotive, #1232 and the great Legacy features.

IMG_6038

Attachments

Images (4)
  • NYC F12e
  • Yorktown Heights on Putnam Division
  • IMG_6038
  • 29433146_10216601049878256_6866733437273767936_o copy 2
Last edited by NYC Fan

The model itself is beautiful and seems to be a good representation of a New York Central F-12 - as run on "The Put." However, in my opinion, this is a toy train color that has no place on a costly, scale-sized, scale-detailed Legacy model which is shown with the correct color in the catalog. The only exception to that should be a buyer who orders a fantasy paint scheme. This did not happen with MTH. I'm disappointed in what I will be receiving. I hope you enjoy the model, Skip.

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR
@MELGAR posted:

The model itself is beautiful and seems to be a good representation of a New York Central F-12 - as run on "The Put." However, in my opinion, this is a toy train color that has no place on a costly, scale-sized, scale-detailed Legacy model which is shown with the correct color in the catalog. The only exception to that should be a buyer who orders a fantasy paint scheme. This did not happen with MTH. I'm disappointed in what I will be receiving. I hope you enjoy the model, Skip.

MELGAR

Thanks! I do agree with you 100%. For the price we pay for these models, They should at minimum stay true to the catalog depiction. I agree also that MTH did not usually let this happen, however, their first PS2 Dreyfuss Hudson was way too light, but they corrected that in the second release.

@MELGAR posted:

The model itself is beautiful and seems to be a good representation of a New York Central F-12 - as run on "The Put." However, in my opinion, this is a toy train color that has no place on a costly, scale-sized, scale-detailed Legacy model which is shown with the correct color in the catalog. The only exception to that should be a buyer who orders a fantasy paint scheme. This did not happen with MTH. I'm disappointed in what I will be receiving. I hope you enjoy the model, Skip.

MELGAR

Melgar,

     You must of missed MTH’s CP Army unit green paint. Instead of Olive Green they used snot green 😀. S happens to all the manufacturers some more than others at least the smokebox has a relative easy solution...........now the Lionel version of PRR Tuscan really chalks my que.

JohnB

The maddening part especially in the case of the NYC is that they got it spot on in the previous release. I was able to find the previous NYC version thankfully since I passed on this one because of the paint. I should have bought the NYC when it was offered new back in 2014-2015 but I must have had too many other irons in the fire then.

@Randy_B posted:

The maddening part especially in the case of the NYC is that they got it spot on in the previous release. I was able to find the previous NYC version thankfully since I passed on this one because of the paint. I should have bought the NYC when it was offered new back in 2014-2015 but I must have had too many other irons in the fire then.

When it comes to this particular locomotive, Lionel seems to never get the production model correct and to match the catalog photo.

With the first NYC Legacy 10 wheeler in 2008, #827, Lionel screwed up the tender lettering adding the word "LINES." The catalog photo showed the correct "NEW YORK CENTRAL" lettering.

With the second Legacy 10 Wheeler in 2014, #1258, The font of the number 1258 is not correct. The catalog had it correct.  Also, Lionel blackened the side rods on the production model. This change was ok with me but different from the catalog photo just the same.

And of course,

With the latest Legacy 10 Wheeler in 2021, #1232, Lionel painted the Smoke Box and Fire Box a light primer gray instead of dark graphite.

My other pet peeve is the horrifically "imaginative" paint job on the Vision Line Niagara.

I'd really be interested in where the process falls apart, causing these uninvited changes.

Last edited by NYC Fan

I noticed that the font used on the NYC 1258 seems a little too big - is that what you mean or the type of font is off? Don't get me started on the Niagara as I passed on that one because of the whitewalls. You think they could have made one or two road numbers without whitewalls to broaden the appeal but I guess not. I never even got to the paint as I couldn't get past the wheels. I'm coming around on the blackened side rods since most of my steamers seem to have them by now so I don't mind them as much.

Last edited by Randy_B

I noticed that the font used on the NYC 1258 seems a little too big - is that what you mean or the type of font is off? Don't get me started on the Niagara as I passed on that one because of the whitewalls. You think they could have made one or two road numbers without whitewalls to broaden the appeal but I guess not. I never even got to the paint as I couldn't get past the wheels. I'm coming around on the blackened side rods since most of my steamers seem to have them by now so I don't mind them as much.



1258 has a differently shaped numbers. Look at the "2."  San Serif font has the thickness of the number the same throughout and the numbers are taller and thinner.

IMG_6202

1232 has the correct Serif font, shorter and wider and you can see the correct shape of the numbers as they vary in thickness throughout the curves.

IMG_6203

It's not the size alone. That's not the New York Central font on 1258. Compare the 1 and the 2 on 1258 to those on 1232 and 1297 which are the correct fonts. They never seem to get the font wrong on Hudsons, Mohawks or Niagaras but this locomotive is snake-bit. The only other example of the wrong font I've seen is the little 1662 switcher.

I hate the Niagara white walls. But, it's not so much that it has white walls, but if it's going to have white walls the drive rods should be shinny new too. White walls with blackened drive rods makes no sense. And as such, the white walls detract from being able to see the action of the drive rods. When in motion all you focus on are the glaring white walls. The silver smoke box was totally uncalled for and disappointing,

Here's the real 1274.

1274 at Carmel - CloseupRESIZED

Attachments

Images (3)
  • IMG_6202
  • IMG_6203
  • 1274 at Carmel - CloseupRESIZED
Last edited by NYC Fan
@NYC Fan posted:

1258 has a differently shaped numbers. Look at the "2."  San Serif font has the thickness of the number the same throughout and the numbers are taller and thinner.

1232 has the correct Serif font, shorter and wider and you can see the correct shape of the numbers as they vary in thickness throughout the curves.

Sorry to nitpick, but neither of those are serif fonts.  They are both sans serif.  Since we are talking about very specific paint details, I think careful use of those words is in order so as not to further confuse the manufacturer if/when they try to remedy the paint and lettering detail issues with the overseas factories.

Serifs are the little "feet" and "tails" that come off of the end of the letters.

Sans Serif
Serif

If you want products to be correct, you are on the scene. If you are selling stuff, you do it this way. We just got 5 Sunset GP9s. Those $$$ used to go to Lionel. No longer do so. We have plenty of trains so no BTO, etc except with Scott.

This is a simple choice of supply methods.  Buyers make their choice also and obviously the numbers must support things as they are. But, if you intend to get Harry or someone else to correct what you don’t like, then you better automatically include the cost in every buying decision.

@NYC Fan posted:

When it comes to this particular locomotive, Lionel seems to never get the production model correct and to match the catalog photo.

With the first NYC Legacy 10 wheeler in 2008, #827, Lionel screwed up the tender lettering adding the word "LINES." The catalog photo showed the correct "NEW YORK CENTRAL" lettering.

With the second Legacy 10 Wheeler in 2014, #1258, The font of the number 1258 is not correct. The catalog had it correct.  Also, Lionel blackened the side rods on the production model. This change was ok with me but different from the catalog photo just the same.

And of course,

With the latest Legacy 10 Wheeler in 2021, #1232, Lionel painted the Smoke Box and Fire Box a light primer gray instead of dark graphite.

My other pet peeve is the horrifically "imaginative" paint job on the Vision Line Niagara.

I'd really be interested in where the process falls apart, causing these uninvited changes.

I have 827 myself, and didn't like "Lines" was on there either. GRJ said that the smoke units in that run of 10 Wheelers always blew after some time, which mine did. I have to ask him what all other options he had said to me other than fixing that with a Super Chuffed and such to go with it. I think the lights and resistor. I'll have to ask him for sure. I like that little engine, and got it for a deal at York in 2019 I believe.

@rplst8 posted:

Sorry to nitpick, but neither of those are serif fonts.  They are both sans serif.  Since we are talking about very specific paint details, I think careful use of those words is in order so as not to further confuse the manufacturer if/when they try to remedy the paint and lettering detail issues with the overseas factories.

Serifs are the little "feet" and "tails" that come off of the end of the letters.

Sans Serif
Serif

I was under the impression that one of the characteristics os serif font was the difference in the thickness of the stroke as in calligraphy. Truth be told, I believe the font to be a mixture of Serif characteristics but without the feet and tails that came out of the Art Deco era. It has been referred to as Grand Central font.

Grand Central Font

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Grand Central Font
@NYC Fan posted:

I was under the impression that one of the characteristics os serif font was the difference in the thickness of the stroke as in calligraphy. Truth be told, I believe the font to be a mixture of Serif characteristics but without the feet and tails that came out of the Art Deco era. It has been referred to as Grand Central font.

The changes in stroke width or weight are just that, stroke variations. There are several serif fonts like Rockwell and Courier that that serifs, but do not vary the stroke width.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serif

Railroad Roman is a serif font and would have been correct for the pre 1940 era. Slight changes in Railroad Roman are not as obvious as the font used on 1258 vs actual NYC sans serif font. One option would be to backdate the engine as RR font is available in transfers from Woodland Scenics but again very tedious to get right.

This would have been correct for pre 1940.


image

Pete

Attachments

Images (1)
  • image
Last edited by Norton
@rplst8 posted:

The changes in stroke width or weight are just that, stroke variations. There are several serif fonts like Rockwell and Courier that that serifs, but do not vary the stroke width.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serif

I agree. I read that the variation in width was one characteristic of Serif fonts. It is apparent that while it may be a characteristic that is prevalent in Serif fonts it can also be present in San Serif fonts as appears to be the case with the Grand Central font used on the 1940 and later New York Central equipment. So I stand corrected.

@Norton posted:

Railroad Roman is a serif font and would have been correct for the pre 1940 era. Slight changes in Railroad Roman are not as obvious as the font used on 1258 vs actual NYC sans serif font. One option would be to backdate the engine as RR font is available in transfers from Woodland Scenics but again very tedious to get right.

This would have been correct for pre 1940.


image

Pete

I always liked the early Roman font like on the Mogul. It would also be correct of the F12e 10 Wheelers but, correct me if I'm wrong, they would have been numbered in the 800's. They were still numbered in the 800' at the time the font was changed so the later Grand Central font would have been used when renumbered to 1200 numbers.

Lionel correctly numbered the first Legacy 10 Wheeler 827 in the old Roman font.

827

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 827

This is true. Likely RR is only correct for 800 numbered engines. Here is a set of CDS Pacemaker transfers. Looks close in size to the 827 ten wheeler. Actual height is .180". This is the 2000 Mikado which really is not a NYC engine. I may reletter it someday.

As for relettering with transfers, the old lettering comes off in seconds with lacquer thinner. I rarely coat transfers as they are fairly durable as long as you avoid handling the area.

image

These come up on eBay every once in a while. There is a set of black letters there now for second generation cars.

Pete

Attachments

Images (1)
  • image
Last edited by Norton
@CarGuyZM10 posted:

Anyone see the CP version yet? I think I've seen every other version, and I was curious how the magnets look on the tender.

I received mine today. It’s very good looking. The smoke box isn’t as light as the video above, mine is darker, much more normal looking, thank goodness.

I can’t say anything about the magnets, my train didn’t include them. Just wrote my dealer about it. I planned to run it as a CP, so it’s not a major issue, but I still want the magnets.

I bought a Southern and liked it so well on my small layout I purchased a Texas & Pacific. As for the gray vs graphite, I bought mine to relax. My take is the locomotives produced in Korea are normally spot on. The locomotives produced in China are hit or miss. I am impressed with the sound, whistle smoke, pulling power, and ability to negotiate O36 curves. If they gray where to upset me, I would just weather. I remind myself this is one of my hobbies and if the model performs well I can modify or find a solution to a cosmedic issue. Hey I just got a 3rd rail missing a staton. Am I sending it back...not on your life. I wished we as hobbyist to appreciate how the locomotives have improved over the last 60 years and relax a little.



2233D896-B943-4F0A-930A-56B6D8D546F4

@Aldovar posted:

We got the Nickel Plate Road version from Mr. Muffins, my boys love it. Not sure how accurate the colors are. It is our first Legacy engine.

Great video!   The excitement in the engineer’s voice is awesome and what it’s all about! Enjoy and cherish your time with him on the layout - in my experience, your engineer will grow up way too fast.

These ten wheelers really are a great size for almost all layouts and are packed with lots of features.

Last edited by Rider Sandman
@NYC Fan posted:

Is this a marketing strategy???

Does anyone think that perhaps Lionel deliberately screws up one aspect of a locomotive each time, so that the next time it's released the same people will buy it again in hopes they got it right?

That is a great point Skip. With the Hudson's it should have been a no brainer on the colors, especially when the art released to Mr. Muffin's was spot on with everything we know. Plus the fact that everyone has been saying that they needed to remake the J3's like the 50th anniversary set. So what happens, way off on all counts except the shape.

I bought a Southern and liked it so well on my small layout I purchased a Texas & Pacific. As for the gray vs graphite, I bought mine to relax. My take is the locomotives produced in Korea are normally spot on. The locomotives produced in China are hit or miss. I am impressed with the sound, whistle smoke, pulling power, and ability to negotiate O36 curves. If they gray where to upset me, I would just weather. I remind myself this is one of my hobbies and if the model performs well I can modify or find a solution to a cosmedic issue. Hey I just got a 3rd rail missing a staton. Am I sending it back...not on your life. I wished we as hobbyist to appreciate how the locomotives have improved over the last 60 years and relax a little.



2233D896-B943-4F0A-930A-56B6D8D546F4

How about some pics of both of them?  Would love to see all the different versions.

You also make a great point about all the impressive features - my gosh, the whistle smokes like a demon!  I wonder if it’s a new design, none of my other Legacy steamers smoke like these do.  Good stuff.

I received mine today. It’s very good looking. The smoke box isn’t as light as the video above, mine is darker, much more normal looking, thank goodness.

I can’t say anything about the magnets, my train didn’t include them. Just wrote my dealer about it. I planned to run it as a CP, so it’s not a major issue, but I still want the magnets.

Hopefully mine will be darker too. I hope you not having the magnets is a fluke. I planned to display mine with the P&R magnets.

@CarGuyZM10 posted:

Hopefully mine will be darker too. I hope you not having the magnets is a fluke. I planned to display mine with the P&R magnets.

So Lionel forgot to make them. My dealer got this email from Lionel:

“They are aware and are making the plates now. They hope to have then in service in about a month.

The plates will come with both tape and magnets depending on how the customer would like to install them (put magnets inside the shell or put the tape on the back of the plates.) If customers call in to CS, we can get them on the list to mail these out when they arrive.  If any dealers need these for product they may still have in store, they can also reach out and we can send them sets to put in the box before sale.”

So Lionel forgot to make them. My dealer got this email from Lionel:

“They are aware and are making the plates now. They hope to have then in service in about a month.

The plates will come with both tape and magnets depending on how the customer would like to install them (put magnets inside the shell or put the tape on the back of the plates.) If customers call in to CS, we can get them on the list to mail these out when they arrive.  If any dealers need these for product they may still have in store, they can also reach out and we can send them sets to put in the box before sale.”

Don't hold your breath. You know what happened with the Hudson boiler fronts that were going to be coming.

@Randy_B posted:

That was the first thing I thought of Skip! I received my NYC 1258 today and I'm pleased. The font is a head scratcher but I can overlook that for the smokebox paint.

Great engine Randy!!!  I've been able to overlook it too. But, when 1232 was announced, I have to admit I zoomed in on the catalog to check out the cab number.

@MELGAR posted:

Can someone please clarify about the "magnets" for me? I'm not aware of any magnets on these models. Where would they be and what would be their purpose?

MELGAR

In the catalog it mentioned the following:

CP Nameplate 2

CP Name Pl;ate

Perhaps they plan to cover CANADIAN PACIFIC with P&R or anything else they may have done for the fan trips.

972 P&R

Attachments

Images (4)
  • CP Nameplate 2
  • CP Name Pl;ate
  • 972 P&R
  • 972 P&R
Last edited by NYC Fan

So Lionel forgot to make them. My dealer got this email from Lionel:

“They are aware and are making the plates now. They hope to have then in service in about a month.

The plates will come with both tape and magnets depending on how the customer would like to install them (put magnets inside the shell or put the tape on the back of the plates.) If customers call in to CS, we can get them on the list to mail these out when they arrive.  If any dealers need these for product they may still have in store, they can also reach out and we can send them sets to put in the box before sale.”

Thank you for the information. I will definitely be contacting customer service.

@NYC Fan posted:

In the catalog it mentioned the following:

CP Nameplate 2

CP Name Pl;ate

Perhaps they plan to cover CANADIAN PACIFIC with P&R or anything else they may have done for the fan trips.

972 P&R

Lionel's page for them shows three separate pictures, each with different tender lettering. The effect is supposed to be exactly as you said for fan trips. http://www.lionel.com/products...y-4-6-0-972-2131060/

Earlier there were some questions about using neolube to darken the smoke boxes on these locos

I found that neolube would stain, get blotchy and darken from the smoke oil that will leak from filling and use. Using a solvent based paint paint may be a better alternative.

If the only issues on these locos are cosmetic I would count myself lucky!

@Jim Sandman posted:

I just ordered the custom run Strasburg one from Nicholas Smith, supposedly only 25 painted this way.  My son has been wanting a Strasburg engine to run with the MTH Strasburg passenger cars.

STRASBURG 4-6-0 #972 - Nicholas Smith Trains

Jim

I did see that out there when I was looking around a few days ago. It does look good, hopefully the boiler is graphite and not "striking silver" or "light battleship gray". Good luck.

I did see that out there when I was looking around a few days ago. It does look good, hopefully the boiler is graphite and not "striking silver" or "light battleship gray". Good luck.

By all appearances, the ten wheelers are all the same. Battleship gray it is unless it was designed to be black or something else. Lionel graphite either shows up as graphite, battleship gray, or silver.  Someone somewhere in the Lionel organization can explain why and how it happens, but to the outside world it’s a roll of the dice. As a consumer, I don’t really care how they get to what is or isn’t as advertised (i.e, catalogued), I just wish they could figure out how to tell us what is coming. For example, I’m stoked for one of the upcoming Legacy Pacifics. If Ryan or Dave would just come out and say “hey, our manufacturer for those can only do battleship gray” that would be helpful (and honest) and I could cancel. Otherwise, I feel like I’m sticking it to my dealer (and friend) if I want to cancel.

By all appearances, the ten wheelers are all the same. Battleship gray it is unless it was designed to be black or something else. Lionel graphite either shows up as graphite, battleship gray, or silver.  Someone somewhere in the Lionel organization can explain why and how it happens, but to the outside world it’s a roll of the dice. As a consumer, I don’t really care how they get to what is or isn’t as advertised (i.e, catalogued), I just wish they could figure out how to tell us what is coming. For example, I’m stoked for one of the upcoming Legacy Pacifics. If Ryan or Dave would just come out and say “hey, our manufacturer for those can only do battleship gray” that would be helpful (and honest) and I could cancel. Otherwise, I feel like I’m sticking it to my dealer (and friend) if I want to cancel.

Yeah, I would say the same thing. My dealer is definitely my friend. I listen to good advice and if I need something, he can probably get it for me depending on what exactly it is. I'm sure within reason, I could ask for something that may be somewhat hard to get, he would probably be able to get it.

I missed that one Jim, I just put in an order!  Thanks for mentioning it, since Lionel refuses to make a real Strasburg locomotive, I'll use this one.  I was considering the Camelback Lionel offered, but I like this choice better.

Yeah, this just kills me--always waiting for a model of a SRR steam prototype to pull my nice coaches, but for now I'm going to settle on the Legacy SW8 and pretend it's for an ultra rare excursion some kind.  At least they actually have one and the Lionel version and it's livery seem to be pretty well done...

Last edited by Tuscan Jim

By all appearances, the ten wheelers are all the same. Battleship gray it is unless it was designed to be black or something else. Lionel graphite either shows up as graphite, battleship gray, or silver.  Someone somewhere in the Lionel organization can explain why and how it happens, but to the outside world it’s a roll of the dice. As a consumer, I don’t really care how they get to what is or isn’t as advertised (i.e, catalogued), I just wish they could figure out how to tell us what is coming. For example, I’m stoked for one of the upcoming Legacy Pacifics. If Ryan or Dave would just come out and say “hey, our manufacturer for those can only do battleship gray” that would be helpful (and honest) and I could cancel. Otherwise, I feel like I’m sticking it to my dealer (and friend) if I want to cancel.

Because of "Build To Order" those of us who want a particular item are forced to preorder to make sure we get one. I know some distributors order more and you can sometimes find these items for sale after they've been delivered. But not always. The more popular road names may be gone by the time they come out. But preordering should not and need not be a crap shoot if Lionel would pay attention to what is being manufactured and insure that the production model is faithful to the catalog representation.

Has anyone returned one of these high end preordered locomotives because of these issues? Most of us have good relationships with our dealers and don't want to ruin that by refusing an item they preordered. I know I stood there with my mouth open when I unboxed my Vision Line Niagara. It was a real WTF moment! But it wasn't my dealers fault and, being a friend, I wasn't about to make it his problem.

Until this whole issue becomes Lionel's problem, I don't see anything getting done to correct it. Right now it seems to be the consumer's problem. Are the dealers and distributers off the hook? I know it's not their fault but somehow this problem has to get back to being Lionel's problem.

I'd love to hear everyones thoughts.

Last edited by NYC Fan

I feel your pain Skip.  No more Lionel anything until they get their act together.  Whether it's Wrong paint (Niagara, Hudson, this engine), mechanical defects (mogul), couplers that don't couple (milk cars and other latest rolling stock), paint that chips off (Milk cars).  I'm DONE!!!!

I agree with you about it's not the dealers fault to a point.  Once a defect has been discovered and is well known, dealers need to take defective inventory off the shelves and send it back.  How many dealers out there have the latest Milk car on shelves and know about the paint issues and the coupler issues yet continue to sell to unsuspecting customers????   Plus Lionel which does not own up to their mistakes, which needs to change and they needs to recall their defective products.   

There, I've done my rant for the week.  I now return you to your regularly scheduled programing

Last edited by superwarp1
@NYC Fan posted:

Because of "Build To Order" those of us who want a particular item are forced to preorder to make sure we get one. I know some distributors order more and you can sometimes find these items for sale after they've been delivered. But not always. The more popular road names may be gone by the time they come out. But preordering should not and need not be a crap shoot if Lionel would pay attention to what is being manufactured and insure that the production model is faithful to the catalog representation.



I'd love to hear everyones thoughts.

My thoughts exactly. I have a few items that I am interested in ordering if they are in upcoming catalogs, but I do not want to bet on the "Quality Control aspects" with my wallet.

I really wanted to get one of the latest N&W J's (my local dealer always orders extra) until I saw the bright orange paint.

The PRR H10's looked HORRIBLE or I would have bought one. From the silver smokebox to the yellow whistle, bell, and pop valves (they should be gold). The tender deck and cab roof were also not the (IMO) the correct shade of red. I know there's an entire thread on this alone... but I think all colors on the PRR engines should match the colors currently found on the engines at RRMPA as they are (truly) the experts.

@NYC Fan posted:

Because of "Build To Order" those of us who want a particular item are forced to preorder to make sure we get one. I know some distributors order more and you can sometimes find these items for sale after they've been delivered. But not always. The more popular road names may be gone by the time they come out. But preordering should not and need not be a crap shoot if Lionel would pay attention to what is being manufactured and insure that the production model is faithful to the catalog representation.

Has anyone returned one of these high end preordered locomotives because of these issues? Most of us have good relationships with our dealers and don't want to ruin that by refusing an item they preordered. I know I stood there with my mouth open when I unboxed my Vision Line Niagara. It was a real WTF moment! But it wasn't my dealers fault and, being a friend, I wasn't about to make it his problem.

Until this whole issue becomes Lionel's problem, I don't see anything getting done to correct it. Right now it seems to be the consumer's problem. Are the dealers and distributers off the hook? I know it's not their fault but somehow this problem has to get back to being Lionel's problem.

I'd love to hear everyones thoughts.

Yeah, if I order something from my dealer, there's no way I'd say sorry, this isn't right, I'm not buying it. The dealers I would say feel our pain as well as if they stock some on the shelves from ordering extras, there's less of a chance to sell a purple nosed Hudson that is supposed to be graphite. Yeah, I'm exaggerating a lot there, but heck, that's how we all feel anyway.

@NYC Fan posted:

Because of "Build To Order" those of us who want a particular item are forced to preorder to make sure we get one. I know some distributors order more and you can sometimes find these items for sale after they've been delivered. But not always. The more popular road names may be gone by the time they come out. But preordering should not and need not be a crap shoot if Lionel would pay attention to what is being manufactured and insure that the production model is faithful to the catalog representation.

Has anyone returned one of these high end preordered locomotives because of these issues?

Yes.

Last edited by GregM

Skip, you’ve hit the nail squarely on the head.  Until it creates pain for Lionel, it will probably never change. These color problems have been going on for nearly five years and they keep happening.  Consumers are getting stuck with stuff they don’t like (although, in fairness, I believe there are many buyers who are ambivalent to the color mistakes).  The dealers are getting stuck with the rest or are spending their own money to try to fix the mistakes (e.g., it was a dealer who first started paying to repaint the Js). Yeah, Lionel has remade a shell or two, but otherwise the burden has not been theirs.

I honestly believe Lionel knows the issue and the frustration it causes for many of their loyal and longtime buyers. They either simply don’t care or they are not capable of fixing it, but they are not unaware.

I’ve long since thought that for many of us, if not most of us, fidelity to previous model releases is more important than fidelity to the prototype.  When I order something based on a catalog illustration, my assumption is that it will be like the one that came out eight years ago that I missed on - or loved and want another one - or whatever.  This should actually make life easier for manufacturers since they really just need to be good at doing what they’ve already done, not something new.  I think that’s the part that’s the most maddening about all of this: look again at Gary’s list (paint mistakes, horrible new couplers, etc) - these are all self-inflicted fumbles of things that have been made at an excellent level before.  It’s not a case of trying something new and failing, it’s suddenly forgetting how to do what you’ve done extremely well for a longtime.  

I think the only real fix on the consumer level is to decide you have enough stuff.  We can’t control anything else anyway.

Last edited by Rider Sandman

I passed on this run of Ten Wheelers but was able to pick up one from the previous run once the news broke. The next thing on my want list is the Camelbacks but I have no idea what the paint will look like on those. The catalog images actually show the dreaded light color for the smokeboxes. I don't know what was prototypical but I'm just used to the graphite by now and much favor it.



I think the only real fix on the consumer level is to decide you have enough stuff.  We can’t control anything else anyway.

Indeed.

While I still do buy things and have a few things on my "need/want" list, if I never got another locomotive it wouldn't be the end of the world.  I have plenty to keep me busy and interested.  I think what Lionel should realize is that there are seemingly less and less young folks getting into the hobby, let alone O scale.  Sure people get into O all the time, but are there enough to replace those that are leaving the hobby?  In order for me to continue to spend that kind of money on locomotives, it's got to be correct and not be broken when I get it.

@rplst8 posted:

Indeed.

While I still do buy things and have a few things on my "need/want" list, if I never got another locomotive it wouldn't be the end of the world.  I have plenty to keep me busy and interested.  I think what Lionel should realize is that there are seemingly less and less young folks getting into the hobby, let alone O scale.  Sure people get into O all the time, but are there enough to replace those that are leaving the hobby?  In order for me to continue to spend that kind of money on locomotives, it's got to be correct and not be broken when I get it.

Unfortunately for me, I fall into the category of "young folks getting into the hobby". Most of the engines that I am interested in were made between 5-10 years ago when I was too young (still in school/ had no expendable income) to buy. These (Legacy PRR K4, M1a, Visionline GG1, the 2012 catalog N&W J) are extremely hard to find on the second hand market so it seems like the only way for me to get my hands on them is for Lionel to re-issue them.

@Prr7688 posted:

My thoughts exactly. I have a few items that I am interested in ordering if they are in upcoming catalogs, but I do not want to bet on the "Quality Control aspects" with my wallet.

I really wanted to get one of the latest N&W J's (my local dealer always orders extra) until I saw the bright orange paint.

The PRR H10's looked HORRIBLE or I would have bought one. From the silver smokebox to the yellow whistle, bell, and pop valves (they should be gold). The tender deck and cab roof were also not the (IMO) the correct shade of red. I know there's an entire thread on this alone... but I think all colors on the PRR engines should match the colors currently found on the engines at RRMPA as they are (truly) the experts.

Do what I did with the H10. I bought a brand new never used Weaver version online, then sent it to @Bruk to convert to Legacy with swinging bell and whistle steam. His work is incredible, and it looks far better than Lionel's version. Cost a little more in the end, but worth every penny.

Matt

@Prr7688 posted:

Unfortunately for me, I fall into the category of "young folks getting into the hobby". Most of the engines that I am interested in were made between 5-10 years ago when I was too young (still in school/ had no expendable income) to buy. These (Legacy PRR K4, M1a, Visionline GG1, the 2012 catalog N&W J) are extremely hard to find on the second hand market so it seems like the only way for me to get my hands on them is for Lionel to re-issue them.

I'm somewhat in the same boat.

I started into O around 2002-2003 after college but my collection was limited to just a Williams New Haven Alco PA ABA set and some streamliners.  I didn't start expanding my collection until 2010 or so, but it was mostly just a piece of rolling stock here or there.  I had gotten an MTH SD70Ace and a cheap RailKing set, both with ProtoSound 2.0 by then as well.

Around 2017 I really started aggressively buying locomotives I wanted to collect once I had saved up and established myself a little more.  There are still things I really want that haven't been made in awhile and most were done before Legacy.

My advice is to learn to repair them and buy broken ones.  As long as the drivetrain is intact, the electronics are replaceable.  That or find older ones that others can upgrade for you.

Last edited by rplst8

It's at least gray and not silver, still too light IMO.

Strasburg 10-Wheeler

I notice that there are a lot of "background" sounds now, more than with previous Legacy.  All sorts of groaning, creaking, squeaking, etc.  I though someone was leaving a voice message until I turned down the volume on the engine!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Strasburg 10-Wheeler
Last edited by gunrunnerjohn

I just got my Ten Wheeler today from Mr. Muffins. I gotta say, the gray on the smokebox is not as bright as it has been made out to be by previous posts in this thread. I will admit it is not prototypical still but it is by no means a light gray. Either way, it is my first Legacy with Whistle Steam locomotive and I could not be any more thrilled.

Attachments

Videos (1)
IMG_3402

It's at least gray and not silver, still too light IMO.

Strasburg 10-Wheeler

I notice that there are a lot of "background" sounds now, more than with previous Legacy.  All sorts of groaning, creaking, squeaking, etc.  I though someone was leaving a voice message until I turned down the volume on the engine!

Thats one thing with all the Lionel issues of late, electronics and legacy sound have been top notch.

@Tuscan Jim posted:

Yeah, this just kills me--always waiting for a model of a SRR steam prototype to pull my nice coaches, but for now I'm going to settle on the Legacy SW8 and pretend it's for an ultra rare excursion some kind.  At least they actually have one and the Lionel version and it's livery seem to be pretty well done...

Haha I got an mth 611 for this exact reason

It's at least gray and not silver, still too light IMO.

Strasburg 10-Wheeler

I notice that there are a lot of "background" sounds now, more than with previous Legacy.  All sorts of groaning, creaking, squeaking, etc.  I though someone was leaving a voice message until I turned down the volume on the engine!

I tried calling you John but kept getting a whistle blowing in my ear. I guess you were working on the layout. All joking aside, gray is better than silver, just wish we didn't have to say that. Instead saying, "look at that great graphite by George, they've done it!"

Just got mine yesterday, and oddly, it looks just like yours!

Funny how that works! Overall I’m pretty happy with it. Sounds are great and I like the 5 whistle options they selected. It’s a solid 8/10 from me. Not to beat a dead horse, but the only thing separating it from being a home run in my mind is the missing back up light and a little more tender detail. The molded in hatch looks more like a lionchief/railking piece. Overall a great engine though!

Oh my. This reminds me of those summer picnics as a kid. My aunt's and my mom would all make some dessert dish for the parties, and someone would make some jello with Cool Whip. That green color is the color of that dessert. Brutal I think would be the proper term on that color. It should be a much darker green, not something mixed with Cool Whip.

Couple of comments about the METCA PRR Ten-wheeler:

1. Did the PRR ever run a ten-wheeler without a Belpaire firebox?

2. Are those colors on the cab roof and the tender deck the same?  To me, the cab roof looks like a darker red.  And, do the cab window colors match either the cab roof or the tender deck?  They look closer to the tender deck color, but not quite the same.

Chuck

@harmonyards posted:

Ahh,..ok thank you,...I thought I was going crazy,...I take it the color is off even for a Texas & Pacific?...I have no knowledge what colors they should be,...so my comment may have jumped the gun, ....and if so, I’ll stand tall & corrected,...😉

Pat

Hmm, catalog looks slightly darker and more of a solid type green without white added into it, lol.Screenshot_20210516-192423

I think when the initial release of the catalog, I said that the color was similar to Baldwin steamer at Steamtown. Number 20 or something like that, what is it darn it?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Screenshot_20210516-192423
@harmonyards posted:

Ahh,..ok thank you,...I thought I was going crazy,...I take it the color is off even for a Texas & Pacific?...I have no knowledge what colors they should be,...so my comment may have jumped the gun, ....and if so, I’ll stand tall & corrected,...😉

Pat

No, you’re good.  It’s way off.

http://nonjohn.com/T%20&%2...0Boogie%20Woogie.htm

Last edited by rplst8

Hmm, catalog looks slightly darker and more of a solid type green without white added into it, lol.Screenshot_20210516-192423

I think when the initial release of the catalog, I said that the color was similar to Baldwin steamer at Steamtown. Number 20 or something like that, what is it darn it?

Baldwin 26, argh. The color for Baldwin 26 is slightly darker, but close.

@WBC posted:

There are lots of similar painted in other scales, perhaps not exactly the same but close.

From our friends at Sunset

200171_1

Here is a link on an S2 Northern

http://www.rgusrail.com/mtgn2584.html

And a class O-1 Mikado

http://www.rgusrail.com/ndgn3059.html

I agree it is in the ballpark, but not a homerun. The T&P green here looks closer to toy-ish plastic to me. I was thinking of picking up one but not now!

@Bill Webb posted:

Thank goodness they are being repainted by the dozens and the price is reasonable. I have photos of piles of boxes, two pallets, and at least 25 engines in the process of being painted.

Bill, where did you hear they are getting repainted? You mentioned this in the 2-8-8-2 thread and I am eager to learn more!

Last edited by 0-Gauge CJ

Wow, the green looks right and the smoke box looks all wrong on the catalog picture!  Look at the picture of the prototype, the smokebox is right on the "as delivered" model.

It would be interesting to know if the smoke box really is silver or if it’s battleship gray that shows up as silver in the lighting of the photo. I’m willing to bet it’s gray. Either way, this is an abomination.  

At some point, one has to assume they simply can’t figure this stuff out and give up on them. It’s real close to that time for me.

It would be interesting to know if the smoke box really is silver or if it’s battleship gray that shows up as silver in the lighting of the photo. I’m willing to bet it’s gray. Either way, this is an abomination.  

At some point, one has to assume they simply can’t figure this stuff out and give up on them. It’s real close to that time for me.

At least they got the black right...

Rusty

At least they got the black right...

Rusty

Pretty soon, all black engines are what we'll all have to buy. It is getting crazy how much the paint schemes are getting further from what they're supposed to be. The N&W J's, the red stripe was off a bit, though I think someone had said that it looked a little bit like how it had at some point or was close to now. The graphite has become shining silver, Tuscon Red becomes orangish, the Challenger became a clown train, the Niagara became the 20th Century Limited, the new L2 Mohawk becomes a Pacemaker. What is next? Navy blue becomes Army green?

The cab roof is a darker red.  I believe that was actually prototypical for at least some PRR steam, it's been discussed here before.

While it may be prototypical to some PRR steam, surviving PRR steam has the darker red on both cab roof has the same darker red on the tender deck.

Check out this picture of 7002's cab/tender at RRMPA. They show the same shade of dark red. I trust them as the authority when it comes to shades of paint for PRR.

Edit: Also check out this thread which contains pictures of 1223 cab and tender taken from walkway over the tracks.

Last edited by Prr7688
@Prr7688 posted:

While it may be prototypical to some PRR steam, surviving PRR steam has the darker red on both cab roof has the same darker red on the tender deck.

Check out this picture of 7002's cab/tender at RRMPA. They show the same shade of dark red. I trust them as the authority when it comes to shades of paint for PRR.

bad link for some reason

Expecting this....

7B8D9A9E-72E0-4844-BA5F-41BB956C42F5

And got this???.....ugh!!!!

mceclip0

Wow!!! I feel really bad for you guys. I thought my NYC smoke box was disappointing, but that flat pale green is down right disturbing.  And nothing like what was advertised in the catalog. Even worse than the Vision Line Niagara. Who at Lionel is responsible for these horrific color choices??? I knew a girl once who drank a whole bottle of Boone's Farm Apple Wine and threw up that color.

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 7B8D9A9E-72E0-4844-BA5F-41BB956C42F5
  • mceclip0
Last edited by NYC Fan

Surely Lionel has issued a blanket RMA so these can be returned without sticking it to the dealers. It does beg the question, who inspected one of these and okayed it for shipment in the first place?  

Are any inspections able to take place right now with COVID going on?

Edit: I know Scott Mann normally takes a trip to the factory to inspect personally and I am assuming here that Lionel would do the same. Is this a reasonable assumption?

Last edited by 0-Gauge CJ
@0-Gauge CJ posted:

Are any inspections able to take place right now with COVID going on?

Edit: I know Scott Mann normally takes a trip to the factory to inspect personally and I am assuming here that Lionel would do the same. Is this a reasonable assumption?

You know, in-person inspections are great, but we have this thing.  Called… The Internet.  Oh, and these other things called digital cameras…

Here’s what I don’t get.  Lionel and other manufacturers need to get permission from the owners of these old railroads to use the logos and trade dress, right?  What company that gives permission to make models of their equipment is going to be “OK” with them looking like this???

Last edited by rplst8
@rplst8 posted:

You know, in-person inspections are great, but we have this thing.  Called… The Internet.  Oh, and these other things called digital cameras…

Here’s what I don’t get.  Lionel and other manufacturers need to get permission from the owners of these old railroads to use the logos and trade dress, right?  What company that gives permission to make models of their equipment is going to be “OK” with them looking like this???

100% agree.  I can't see why Lionel can't make a reference color chart and send it to the manufacturer.  They take the model and place it next to the chart and shoot it with a camera in the same shot.  It either matches the colors on the chart or it doesn't.

I'm sorry folks but I will never accept a locomotive that is so off in color that you have to pay someone else to make it right.

@harmonyards posted:

Rick’s comparison is .....”iiiiiiiiidentical” .....😉...

Pat

Pat, as my brother says when saying the line you are quoting, "you have to remember to clap your hands." Too many times have I quoted that and been corrected by him. Heck, I supposed to be the movie guy in the family, but the leading lady is why he remembers it better than me even though I like her too.

@0-Gauge CJ posted:

Are any inspections able to take place right now with COVID going on?

Edit: I know Scott Mann normally takes a trip to the factory to inspect personally and I am assuming here that Lionel would do the same. Is this a reasonable assumption?

I’m talking about stateside inspection before they were sent to the dealers. In other words, how could someone in North Carolina open the container and deem these worthy to pass on to their dealers?

I learned years ago as a young engineer that it is much better to build in quality than it is to inspect in quality. But, at a minimum you have to try to do the latter if you’re not doing the former!

@trains52 posted:

Remember, they are only  Toy Trains

...to some.

To others, such as myself, these are upper-end models that should be close to realism. (I reserve the term 'high-end' for 3rd rail and other manufacturers who work in brass that are extremely realistic).

FYI, This is how Lionel defines the engines in the "Legacy" family (taken straight from the catalog):



Note the use of the phrases: 'life-like detail' and '[resemblance] to true-to-like counterparts'.

Now, I don't think anyone is counting the rivets on these. However, paint shades are one of the first things you see when walking into the same room as the models and should be right.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by Prr7688

I think an appointment with the eye doctor is in order!

mceclip0  

Yup.   And here's a good broad daylight shot of the real one posted earlier:

http://nonjohn.com/Texas%20&%20Pacific%20316.jpg

The green mint pastel color Lionel used isn't even close. It's roughly like the aaf0d1 shown below. I don't think any locomotive in history has ever been painted this color! 



#aaf0d1 Color Information

In a RGB color space, hex #aaf0d1 (also known as Magic mint) is composed of 66.7% red, 94.1% green and 82% blue. Whereas in a CMYK color space, it is composed of 29.2% cyan, 0% magenta, 12.9% yellow and 5.9% black. It has a hue angle of 153.4 degrees, a saturation of 70% and a lightness of 80.4%. #aaf0d1 color hex could be obtained by blending #ffffff with #55e1a3. Closest websafe color is: #99ffcc.

Last edited by breezinup

Skip, on another forum Lionel told a buyer of the T&P engine he could return his engine to his dealer and Lionel would refund the dealer so he wouldn’t be stuck with the engine. I suspect that would only apply to engines not run though. Lionel also made it clear they won’t be repainting nor replacing shells.

Pete

Last edited by Norton
@Norton posted:

Skip, on another forum Lionel told a buyer of the T&P engine he could return his engine to his dealer and Lionel would refund the dealer so he wouldn’t be stuck with the engine. I suspect that would only apply to engines not run though. Lionel also made it clear they won’t be repainting nor replacing shells.

Pete

I didn't expect that there would be any repainting or replacement for the product that's already been delivered. I think it would be reasonable for Lionel to acknowledge the problem to the extent that they recognize that customers are unhappy with changes to the catalog renditions and preproduction models displayed at train shows, and, discuss how they can remedy the situation so that it doesn't continue to happen in the future and we can pre-order with confidence.

I will say that if all of the people who bought that Texas & Pacific 4-6-0 returned that particular locomotive (it really is unacceptable) it might certainly get Lionel's attention.

Last edited by NYC Fan
@NYC Fan posted:

I didn't expect that there would be any repainting or replacement for the product that's already been delivered. I think it would be reasonable for Lionel to acknowledge the problem to the extent that they recognize that customers are unhappy with changes to the catalog renditions and preproduction models displayed at train shows, and, discuss how they can remedy the situation so that it doesn't continue to happen in the future and we can pre-order with confidence.

I will say that if all of the people who bought that Texas & Pacific 4-6-0 returned that particular locomotive (it really is unacceptable) it might certainly get Lionel's attention.

The only thing that really got addressed to any kind of fixing was the Polar Express passenger cars IIRC. Thing is how are these engines different from those cars? Overall cost. There it is. Thing is though, if you add up the number of cars in the set, the production number produced and compared it to these T&P engines, I would think that the Polar Express cars would number more. For their part(Lionel), it is much easier to redo the cars than fix the engines because of the time involved in the work to them.

So does this mean that anyone that returns a T&P engine, that it goes to the scrap heap like the Moguls or do they get set aside to be reused down the line in another mis-painted future Ten Wheeler?

Either way we the consumers look at it, it is extremely aggravating. What we want we just don't seem to get. What they advertise/promote always seems to be slightly off mark or past Jupiter, Pluto, or any other planet we don't want to be near.

What do they want us to do? Do they want us to out source painters, Harmon Shops, Altoona Works, Schenectady, what? It is getting to the point where almost all of us have grievances that make not even a ripple in the ocean.

I was thinking today of bugging 3RD Rail to see if they would consider making a Dreyfuss Hudson. It would have to be two different versions(two road numbers), one with 12 wheel tender, other with the PT tender. At least we would know that it would be one great model(or two in this case should that happen).

@Strummer posted:

Interesting...plus, technically, the "Polar Express" didn't actually exist, did it?

Mark in Oregon

Well, the first run they had done the colors were spot on(I didn't get any of these), but the next and most recent ones the blue was so far off like the T&P mint green. One of the guys at York that year was ready to rip into Ryan(which he sort of did). Regardless, the issue was supposed to be corrected and I don't know the particulars, but if you were to look up "Polar Express wrong color" or something to that effect you would find the info on that.



I was thinking today of bugging 3RD Rail to see if they would consider making a Dreyfuss Hudson. It would have to be two different versions(two road numbers), one with 12 wheel tender, other with the PT tender. At least we would know that it would be one great model(or two in this case should that happen).

3rd Rail has done one already. Best detail of all of them. They have also made an ESE, J1a, J1d, and J3a Super Hudson. A few are on ebay now.

Pete

Attachments

Videos (1)
IMG_0199
@Norton posted:

3rd Rail has done one already. Best detail of all of them. They have also made an ESE, J1a, J1d, and J3a Super Hudson. A few are on ebay now.

Pete

Dang it Pete, raining on my parade! That is a beautiful model. I wish I could get one. I did see a J1d out there, but I was looking at something else for a bit. I may have to expand my horizons of course, but that will wait for a bit(but not too long, lol).

Dave, I was saying all of those engines have already been made by 3rd Rail. They have all been on the auction site in past. I still say your best path to getting a Dreyfuss is get a Lionel TMCC or MTH one and have Sid or Bruk upgrade it for you. They are both well detailed,  solid engines with Pittmans that anything produced today will not have.

Pete

@Norton posted:

Dave, I was saying all of those engines have already been made by 3rd Rail. They have all been on the auction site in past. I still say your best path to getting a Dreyfuss is get a Lionel TMCC or MTH one and have Sid or Bruk upgrade it for you. They are both well detailed,  solid engines with Pittmans that anything produced today will not have.

Pete

Ah, and yeah. I was asking Pat on one of the MTH runs that I saw, was the one with the paint that is off. I'll keep looking of course, because that is one of the things I do a lot of. Got a different engine that will be coming to me in a few. Plus waiting on that Kline Hudson to see if it doesn't sell. If it doesn't, I'm in a good place. If it does sell, well at least I tried. Heck, who knows, maybe I'll check out one of the J1's by 3RD rail. I'm a Hudson junky, lol.

I just looked this up on YouTube to compare colors on the Southern version. First two are from the video, last is from the catalog. I thought that the catalog was off as it was more metallic than what it was supposed to be. Is the color almost right or there(aside from the super shiny boiler that shouldn't be)?So 10 03

Don't forget the catalog image is Photoshopped.

Rusty

Don't forget the catalog image is Photoshopped.

Rusty

Yeah, space painted, out there, colors galore. Question is though, is the models color close to what the Southern colors are supposed to be? I have only just gotten the call today that the Ten Wheelers I ordered are in, and wouldn't be able to check the color out until I pick it up. I do have a FM Trainmaster(old one) that is Southern, but I don't know if that color is the same as what the Crescent Limited colors are. Granted the video was short, and the picture I cropped of the tender was glared by light because of the camera angle. Wish there was more videos out there.

Is the color almost right or there(aside from the super shiny boiler that shouldn't be)?

I’m not an expert on the Southern, but as delivered it looks pretty close.  The catalog has the tender looking darker while the boiler looks shiny or metallic like you say.

Compare here to the Ps-4 at the Smithsonian:
https://americanhistory.si.edu...bject/nmah_214493%2C

Even the two pictures they have there look different from one another due to the lighting, and they are of the same locomotive!

Add Reply

Post
This forum is sponsored by Lionel, LLC

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×