Oh Nicole, I didn't mean to beat up on the British. I love many things British - some very dear friends, its Navy, and many, many of its cars: I've owned five Austin Healey 3000s in my time, and I loved every one. A couple of Sprites, too and a MG Midget - feel the same about them. And I have very fond memories of maybe the most satisfying car I ever owned, an Aston Martin Vantage. Still wish I had that car . . .
But really, I'm assuming you never owned or worked on one, because you are coming to its defense. I was not unfortunate enough to own one, but I had friends who did and that meant I ended up working on them - too often.
The Daimler Dart, or SP250 as it was called in the US, was wretchedly bad. Truly among the worst sports cars ever. It was basically made on a TR-3 frame with a fiberglass body loosely (and noisily) mounted onto it and a wonderful little 2.5 liter, or in a handfull of cases, larger hulking, 4.5 liter, V8 installed a bit too far forward. What was wrong with it, beyond its very marginal quality control and assembly was:
- Frame twist so bad the doors would open themselves on early models. The TR3 frame would twist under engine weight and position it was not really designed for, and under power in turns the doors would pop open on early models. This was fixed with a change in the door latch mechanism, but the chassis flex that made handling, uh, -- let's call it interesting rather than challenging -- never was addressed.
- It was ugly. Really, it looks like a TR3 to which someone has added fins because - well, that's basically what has been done . . . this was made all the worse because Austin Healey 3000s, Jag XKanythings, were just gorgeous, as were some early Astons. The MGA was classic, the TR2 and 3 while not going to win any beauty contests, look purposeful and quite nicely done. The SP250 looked like their ugly step-sister.
- The fiberglas was not good quality. Yes, it doesn't rust. But it sort of unraveled - the fiberglass strands would slowly work loose in panels and the panels would expand somewhat like plywood that gets old and moist, and become something about as strong as sheetrock. Now, in fairness, some early Lotus cars, Corvettes, and others that used fiberglas also had problems with fiberglas quality. Way back when I somehow gained a reputation of doing good fiberglass body work I met a lot of people with these cars. I did work on several friends' SP250s and it was the worst fiberglas I ever saw on anything but some really bad kit cars -- often it was easier just to throw away the original bodywork and make new . . .
- for all its V8 power and light fiberglas weight got it, it did not have that much performance. It was just very slightly faster than an AH3000 in a straight line, but it could not run with a good one on the track . . . Again, I'm not beating up on British cars or even British sopecialty manufacturer's cars: TVR had some of the same quality and body problems that the SP250 had, but you could forgive those is a car that fast.
Sorry if I rattled your cage though. And for the record, if I found a 1:43 model of a Daimler Dart/SP250, I'd buy it in a heartbeat, and put it on my layout.