Skip to main content

lastic I know many modelers don't like the the plastic look that some kits and built up buildings have and either weatherize or dullcote them to make them appear more natural. So curiosity has me wondering those of you who dislike such a plastic look appearance and do a repaint --  do you basically paint your structures the colors the buildings were originally molded in - but with a matt or satin finish - or do you choose a different paint scheme? 

Last edited by ogaugeguy
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I kitbashed a number of Placsicville junkbox stations into all kinds of different stations...two story, arrowhead shaped (for junction), and an angled one for crossing,  and painted them all with my road's building colors, aspen yellow and spruce green, but decided they were more S scale than O (vs. the kit built O scale stations I have) and am not using them.  After painting I dullcoated them all.  I kitbash and repaint everything (Menard's etc.) because I want them to be "different".  Plasticville, so common, demands it.

I repaint them. Depending on the material... some I even prime and paint on base coat. What are you trying to achieve and which building are you targeting - has a procedure all of its own...

So which building(s) are we looking at?

This is a Lionel water tower that I used a flat tan primer to cover the green molded in color look, then it was weathered with black acrylic washes...

20151006_215619_Richtone[HDR)

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 20151006_215619_Richtone(HDR)

It depends on the molded color of the plastic kit. If the colors are realistic, I finish the building with a flat finish. But there is usually something that needs repainted. Currently I am working on the MTH Yard Tower. The brick color was good, so I just added mortar lines. The roof was a dark grey, which was wrong for clay tile, so I repainted with burnt sienna. The window frames are a good color match to the brick and clay tile, so I will leave them as is, but will repaint the spouting around the roof and downspouts the same color. Everything will get a flat finish and then be weathered.

 

IMG_0084

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_0084
Matthew Jones posted:

It depends on the molded color of the plastic kit. If the colors are realistic, I finish the building with a flat finish. But there is usually something that needs repainted. Currently I am working on the MTH Yard Tower. The brick color was good, so I just added mortar lines. The roof was a dark grey, which was wrong for clay tile, so I repainted with burnt sienna. The window frames are a good color match to the brick and clay tile, so I will leave them as is, but will repaint the spouting around the roof and downspouts the same color. Everything will get a flat finish and then be weathered.

 

IMG_0084

 

The mortar work on this building is beautiful!

Joe, thanks for the compliment on the mortar work! My "secret" is drywall joint compound or vinyl spackling. Both are easy to work with and because they are water based, I can easily remove mistakes and start over (they can be washed off). When the model is finished, I apply a coat of flat finish to seal the mortar.

Matthew:

Thanks for the info. When you said water based you gave me an idea. I have used lightweight spackling in the past for repairs. what I found is that after opening the container no matter how well I close it the spackle hardens and becomes useless for the next job. The next container I buy I am going to start to mix water into the spackle once opened and see how well this goes. 

Joe

Yep, I paint everything. I have only a few plastic structures, and only three from kits. One is scratch-built and the rest are made from wood. The RR structures needed to be a specific paint job that the RR I model had all their structures painted in, in the timeframe I model.

But these are the plastic ones:

The water tower in the back is also plastic, but it had to be painted as it was scratch built...

Being a fantasy type builder I pay little attention to real, a genuine attempt trying to stay very close O scale maybe but not exact by any stretch.

So I paint, bash, add led lights , all kinds of fooling around with plastic buildings.

The project also ends up in the garbage can sometimes.

Larry

The point is to have fun, not make it to much like WORK

 

 

 

DSCN4850

 

DSCN4856

Attachments

Images (2)
  • DSCN4850
  • DSCN4856
Larry Sr. posted:

The point is to have fun, not make it to much like WORK

I've never understood derisive comments like this. Why do you think those of us who paint stuff think of it as work or hate doing so? Has it ever occurred to you that we enjoy doing stuff like this?

I don't talk smack about folks who go with out-of-the-box stuff, but I've never understood why the opposite view is quite common...

Larry Sr. posted:

I personally think you just like to be a smart *** sometimes.

And I'm quite sure you like being one most of the time.

I stand by my comment as I often see people in O scale who like their trains being more 'toylike' talking smack about those who don't. I rarely see the opposite being the case, and frankly, I'm tired of that.

Last edited by p51

Unmodified Plasticville is just fine for traditional toy-train and tinplate-type layouts IMHO. Sometimes it's preferable to expediently create filled-in layout spaces and deal with detailing later, if at all.

Some guys make a contest out of "my work is better than yours" and it gets a bit tiresome. My model railroad priorities are to dispatch and operate a variety of fairly long trains over an interesting route, not in creating contest-quality architectural-grade models of buildings. Everyone should spend their time on whichever facets of the hobby are most interesting to them and not get caught up in peer pressure of what they "should" do.

After 20+ years my HO scale layout is finally shaping up with more details and scenery. It wasn't my first priority!

100_4559

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 100_4559
Last edited by Ace

Greetings Everyone,

 

Well, here I go again and I'll probably get yelled at for it as well, (I'm used to the yelling.....I've been married for 22 years).   I sometime say, "I'm going down to the basement to "work" on my layout".  But I really don't mean "work" in the true sense.  It's just a word normally used to describe the "act" of doing something.  Now, if the wife gives me something to do, that particular task will be considered "work" by me.   The layout, not so much.  My point is simply this.  Let's not get our panties in a bunch on the verbiage used by each of us describing the act of completing any "task" on our layout.   Does anyone remember the song, "I've been workin' the layout"?  I think that's the name of the song?   Oh well, I hear the wife calling  so I guess it's time to head downstairs and "work" on my layout.  Jeez, come on guys, it's a hobby (and a great hobby at that) so let's just have fun.   In the words of a man who was very well known to the Law Enforcement Community many years back, "Can't we all just get along?"

 

Chief Bob (Retired)

It was an evolutionary process for me.  I started out just repainting buildings when I didn't like the initial color.  Then I started adding mortar lines to brick.  One day I botched that, and since I was unable to get the mortar color off I painted the brick to start over.  

Mike your farm is incredible.

<q>I stand by my comment as I often see people in O scale who like their trains being more 'toylike' talking smack about those who don't. I rarely see the opposite being the case, </q>

I've seen condescension on all sides, and I've seen those on all sides who can be extremely gracious.  In my experience it is more about the person than the type of model railroader he is.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×