Skip to main content

I have a lower level table that is 6 x 4 that I'm going to expand to either 12 x 4 or 10 x 4 depending on some spacing.  Right now I have a O36 Fastrack outer loop and an O27 inner loop.  I was thinking of making the inner loop Fastrack and using O36 and O31 curves to make it work.  The one thing I'm trying to add with this redesign is a siding so I can store some engines or cars.  Nothing too extensive, just one track.  I would like to make more spurs but don't think I have the room.

Two questions:

1. I am using SCARM to plan my track and when I layout the design it looks like I have enough space between the rails but then when I use the 3D view it seems like my lines are right up against each other.  How accurate is that view?  Are my lines really going to have that little space between them or is that just the software not being 100% accurate?

2. For the spacing between the inner and outer loop where I want to put my siding it looks like I have enough room on the software, but it just doesn't seem to line up when I do the math.  An O36 outer loop with some short pieces included to stretch the size width wise gives me 41 inches inside the track (O36 inside diameter 33 inches plus the 8 inches of track added to extend the width).  The O31 curves have an outside dimension of 34 inches.  That leaves me about 7 inches of space between the loops.  Yet SCARM shows I can put an O36 Manual Switch in and have space for the spur.  Again, how accurate is this spacing? When using an O36 right hand switch, what is the space that creates between the tracks?  Also, can I use the little quarter turn track the switch comes with to reverse the curve back left to reduce the space between the spur and my straight track?

Attachments

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

SCARM appears to use 3.5" for roadbed width, regardless of track brand, for both the 3D view and the roadbed when you turn on Roadbed in settings. If you turn on the Center Rail in settings, you'll find your spacing for the center rails along the top of your design is less than 3.5" center-to-center. That appears too be close, especially with the curves you have, and engines are likely to hit each other as they pass. That's acceptable spacing in yards where speeds are slow and tracks are straight. 4.5" is the recommended minimum for mainlines and that depends on engines being run. Large engines can require 6" or more because of the engine overhang. Plus, your tracks are very close to the edge and if there's an accident, there's a good chance something will end up on the floor.

Here's an alternate configuration that might give you some ideas. I also included a photo of your original so those without SCARM can see it.

Lower Level Expansion v3 daz

Lower Level Expansion v3

Attachments

A few things that I’ve learned using SCARM …

You’re correct in guessing the software isn’t 100% accurate.  

SCARM is a good way to estimate how the track will look in a given amount of real estate.  It’s especially helpful when estimating how much curve (036, 048, 060, 072) will fit.   You won’t know for sure how things will work until the track hits the table.

There is some wiggle room with Fastrack.  You can flex everything a bit to close gaps.  Don’t sweat getting everything to connect perfectly in SCARM.  The 1 3/8 and 1 3/4 pieces are handy to have to fill in gaps.

Even though you might not have big engines, using 072 switches helps reduce the space between the tracks when building a crossover.

You might consider using a crossover to extend a siding into the center of the layout like I did.  It opens up the possibility to more storage for the outer loop.

C8A00286-6B91-408B-99A9-23D762213ED8

Attachments

Images (1)
  • C8A00286-6B91-408B-99A9-23D762213ED8
Last edited by VJandP

Are you limited to 4' width?  If you could go 5' x 10' instead of 4' x 12', it would be much easier to put an O48 FasTrack loop outside your O36 loop.  This keeps your trains more away from any table edge and allows sufficient space between tracks to avoid damaging trains passing on curves.  Generally, O31 inside of O36 only works if you stick a decent size piece of straight track in the middle of each O36 half-circle.

Chuck

@PRR1950 posted:

Are you limited to 4' width?  If you could go 5' x 10' instead of 4' x 12', it would be much easier to put an O48 FasTrack loop outside your O36 loop.  This keeps your trains more away from any table edge and allows sufficient space between tracks to avoid damaging trains passing on curves.  Generally, O31 inside of O36 only works if you stick a decent size piece of straight track in the middle of each O36 half-circle.

Chuck

Unfortunately, this is a table that I have under another table, so I'm limited on the width by the upper table. (picture below)  The upper table is 4 x 12 and I need to stay in the same footprint.  That is also why I have those odd "bumps" in the layout I designed, I need to account for the upper table legs.

Once my kids go off to college (many years from now) I'll finally be able to take over the entire basement!

DoubleDAZ / VJandP - thanks for the help, I'm going to play around tonight on SCARM and see what I can come up with. 

20220202_102305

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 20220202_102305
@DoubleDAZ posted:

And here's one more with a bit more clearance on the right and lower right.

Lower Level Expansion v3 daz3

Thanks for all your help!  I took your ideas and came up with a new track plan I think I might try.  I have to get all the lumber and build out the table first, then I'll use those measurements to confirm everything will work. 

I created two separate loops that will have their own power source and block sections between them.  Also, I was going to isolate the siding.  This is my first attempt at using block tracks, so I'll have to start doing my research on that now.

I know I made some spacing tight, but I think it will work and I have room to make small adjustments in the design once I have it all laid out. Let me know if you think this new option has any glaring mistakes.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Files (1)

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×