Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The only other free one I know of is AnyRail, but the free version limits you to 50 pieces of track. It's possible to design bigger layouts, but they have to be in sections of 50 pieces or less, not really a worthwhile endeavor for too large a layout. At least it lets you get a feel for the program before you buy it.

 

There is also a version of RR-Track that comes with MTH R-T-R train sets, but it's technically not free because you have to buy one of their sets. Unfortunately, it's limited to RealTrax too. The latest paid version (5.1) offers more track libraries and program features, including a simulation feature that lets you test various train configurations on your layout to look for design problems.

 

FWIW, I've tried SCARM and still use it when offering suggestions to others working on their designs in SCARM. I use RR-Track v5.1 for my own design work and think it was well worth the ~$100 I paid for the bundle I bought after using what came with my R-T-R set. Considering how much this hobby costs, I just figured that in the big scheme of things, another $100 was not all that much. For me, it seemed like a good investment because I have a year or so to finalize my design. I also enjoy just playing with various designs, especially the simulation feature, while I'm waiting to start construction on something larger than my current 6x8 oval.

Last edited by DoubleDAZ

Jason,

 

I've been using RR-Track for years, since version 3.  I like it.  It has some learning curve, but it's very useful.  It has very extensive libraries of track and accessories.  But the "what if" scenario planning is the real value.  When you realize that an O31 switch can cost you anywhere from $60-90, the price of RR-Track really looks pretty reasonable because it saves you from the "buy and try" approach to model railroading (very expensive).

 

George 

I have been saying this for months now as folks evaluate various track-planning Freeware in the market.  RR-Track is a well-established, proven software program for years, and it supports many -- if not all -- of the major track and accessory libraries.  And it's very intuitive with a very short learning curve (in my experience).  Value your time.  Spend a few dollars, and think "big picture".  You will not be disappointed.  

 

David

 

P.S.  I have no dog in this hunt... No financial ties to RR-Track.  Just a great program I've used over the years since V3, when it was distributed on 3.25" diskettes!!!    I now use V5.

Originally Posted by sinclair:

But RR Track doesn't work in OS X.

I left the PC world behind a long time ago, and never looked back... at least from a HW perspective.      I'm running Parallels w/Windows on one of my Mac computers whenever I need to run a windows-only program.   I can count them on one hand, but it's a nice convenience to be able to run them on a Mac.  No big deal... and certainly not a show-stopper by any means.

 

David

Originally Posted by sinclair:
Originally Posted by DoubleDAZ:
Originally Posted by sinclair:

But RR Track doesn't work in OS X.

Which one does?

XTrkCAD, Empire Express, and RailModeller.  But EE is out of date sadly.  It has been the simplest planning software package I ever used.

Originally Posted by cbojanower:
RailModeller works in OSX and is a pretty good program, not as robust as RR-Track but overall works well. Its fairly inexpensive as well

I was really talking about those that were mentioned.

 

Anyway, I knew about RailModeller, but I didn't know XTrackCAD did, so that's news. I've always wondered why XTrackCAD isn't mentioned here more, but it has been awhile since I've used it.

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×