Skip to main content

there was some discussion a little while ago, about transition curves. I’ve just re-laid my FasTrack loose-lay test track in the study, and O72-O36-O36-O36-O72 works well. It’s geometrically correct, looks quite good and certainly improves the running and stability.

I did have a similar loose-lay set-up using 4 x O72 and 3 x O48 over Xmas, that worked well but space considerations were an issue.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It doesn’t greatly increase the overall width of the curve. It definitely improves tracking and stability, too. I’ve tried this with a combination of O36 and O48 and it looked odd (the differing arc lengths mean the curve can’t be symmetrical) and didn’t really improve tracking.

I’ve also tried a combination of O54 and O42 using O27 track, that worked well but I prefer to use Fastrack for carpet lay, its wider base means it is more stable and it helps keep the fluff out of the loco.

Last edited by Rockershovel

I did this as a kid 50+ years ago, using O-72 sections either side of O-31, and it really improved the looks of things.  On the layout I'm constructing right now, I have two spiraled horseshoe curves, where the inner main radius varies from O-104 down to O-72 at the apex of each, with easements on either end.  This will be implemented using GG flex track, following a path defined by coordinate points determined mathematically using Excel.  Both of these curves are hidden and lower-level, so their visible entry points will look great but I'm shaving 14" off the diameter.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×