Skip to main content

p51 posted:
WestinghouseEMDdemoguy posted:
naveenrajan posted:

 " I have never seen an operating steam locomotive & because I have only been in the US for the last 15 years, I have no appreciation for or interest in steam locomotives & other historically significant but obsolete train models"

 

I would suggest to go online, find a local train excursion with a steam engine and go check it out.  Post your findings afterwards, willing to bet after you've seen one in action you'll change your position.

I'd be willing to bet that it won't. Seriously, I know plenty of people just like naveenrajan, for whom steam is meaningless in any context because they were born decades into the diesel era.

Many hobbyists are all about the new and little else.

I'd never met a train buff who didn't like steam as much as the newest diesels for most of my life, but in the last decade I've met a lot of them, all of whom are in their 40s or younger.

Once your focus group gets out of the baby boomers or older, you'd be surprised what spins the spurs of younger train buffs. I know I sure was.

I think that it is hard to make generalizations about almost anything people are interested in. There are young people out there, I have seen them at car shows, that are into the whole 1950's car thing, the hot rods, the clothing, you name it, yet they were born many decades after the 1950's...by the time they were growing up, the era of hot rods a la American Graffitti was long gone, yet they embrace it. There is a show called Lead East, that happens every labor day literally within earshot of where I live, and they feature doo wop groups and such, have the old cars from that era, yet it attracts a lot of people in their 20's and 30's. 

I grew up long after steam locomotives were only seen in old movies and pictures, other than maybe excursion engines, yet I was fascinated by them (I am in my 50's).  People still come across pictures of them, and from watching little kids at train shows, they seem to love the steam engines they see running, and I can understand why. Steam Engines were dirty, noisy, hard to maintain, rough on the crews, diesels are easier to operate, cleaner, easier on the crews, and it is why railroads switched. On the other hand, Steam Engines are just plain interesting looking, Diesels are marvels of engineering and design, but they are relatively plain, steam engines because they are noisy, with steam pouring out of the valves, siderods moving, the steam whistle, they look more like some prehistoric beast then something produced on a production line and I think kids see that and are attracted, much like they are with dinosaurs. 

Sure, there will always be those who want to model what they see, but there are also a lot who are fascinated by things that came before. I ran into it myself, I finally broke down and bought a tube amplifier to match the turntable I have and a collection of records I have scrounged far and wide, and sitting there listening to the music, with all the pops and clicks, and seeing the glowing tubes, is fun (and I am not going to argue whether solid state amps are more efficient, less noise, that cd's and digital music is 'noiseless', that a good solid state amp is just as 'warm', that isn't what this is about).  It simply is some people I think will always be fascinated by trains. I love the pictures and such people post on some of the threads about old NYC, yet I grew up long after the railroads were a shadow of what they were, I never saw the Els (other than the third avenue extension that ran in the Bronx until the 70's, the one that did this crazy up and over of the Cross Bronx)..

So I do think that steam engines will still be produced as toys and models and some will like them, even young people. It is funny when I hear posts complaining that young people aren't interested in things like rail societies and such, many of the people in those groups when they were young were not exactly hanging out at rail historical societies, they were dating, watching tv, listening to music, drinking with friends, and doing the things that kids and young adults do, in the 1950's they were all hooligans going to be motorcycle gang members, in the 1960's they were either hippies spaced on acid, terrorists of the Weather Underground, or were zombies in front of the tube...more importantly, I don't think kids are zoomed out zombies, but I think that many of those groups do nothing to attract young people, either. Many of them, and I have seen rail historical groups in action, don't exactly reach out to younger people, there is a branch near where I live, where the guys spend time restoring old rail equipment, and while some of the guys were really friendly and forthcoming, a lot of them were clannish and cliquish and quite honestly, turned me off (I was in my 30's at the time), as if I was trying to enter some sort of secret society..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

bigkid posted:
p51 posted:

Seriously, I know plenty of people just like naveenrajan, for whom steam is meaningless in any context because they were born decades into the diesel era.

Many hobbyists are all about the new and little else.

I'd never met a train buff who didn't like steam as much as the newest diesels for most of my life, but in the last decade I've met a lot of them, all of whom are in their 40s or younger.

Once your focus group gets out of the baby boomers or older, you'd be surprised what spins the spurs of younger train buffs. I know I sure was.

I think that it is hard to make generalizations about almost anything people are interested in. There are young people out there, I have seen them at car shows, that are into the whole 1950's car thing, the hot rods, the clothing, you name it, yet they were born many decades after the 1950's...by the time they were growing up, the era of hot rods a la American Graffitti was long gone, yet they embrace it. There is a show called Lead East, that happens every labor day literally within earshot of where I live, and they feature doo wop groups and such, have the old cars from that era, yet it attracts a lot of people in their 20's and 30's. 

Yeah, my WW2 living history group has several 20-somethings in it, too.

My point was that in spite of all this, people need to accept that generally, interests shift over time. It's simply unrealistic for a young person to get all misty-eyed as someone who recalls steam on the mainlines.

I was quite shocked years ago to encounter the first train buff who had no interest in steam. And I have encountered a lot just like him since then.

At an airshow a few years ago, I saw a group of airplane fans who were all in the 30s or younger, and none of them showed any interest in anything older than, say, the 70s. They didn't even look up when a flight of two B-17s went overhead.

We need to accept that what spins people's spurs now (or in the past), won't always be the case.

I'm 74, yet I only got to watch steam in action for only a few years. So, the majority of you never saw it (or streamlined diesels, for that matter) except at places like the Strasburg RR. My first "train riding" was on electric locals. I even rode one to high school every day. When I started working, I found myself traveling behind a GG1 for a few years (in ugly black PennCentral paint). Some people have appreciation for the "old stuff", and some don't.

From what I have seen, I am a youngster on the forum (being 23). I personally am fascinated by steam locomotives. In my growing collection of motive power, I only have one diesel which is Bessemer. Both my father and grandfather worked for the Bessemer and up until this past winter, I had never seen a live steam locomotive. I have seen lots of steam locomotives on permanent display, but just because I had never seen one running, that didn't take away my fascination. Traveling to Cumberland and experiencing the sights, sounds, and smells of WMSR 734 made my love for steam even greater. To me, nearly all modern diesel locomotives are the same (Don't have me for that one!). Steam has so much more character in my mind. I think many here would agree. Now I don't know many my age that share my love for trains, but I do not see any day that there are not people that love trains every bit as much as me.

-Marc 

DennyM posted:
naveenrajan posted:

I am 38 & I have never seen an operating steam locomotive & because I have only been in the US for the last 15 years, I have no appreciation for or interest in steam locomotives & other historically significant but obsolete train models like the California Zephyr or the EMD F-units. In the past I also used to get annoyed with model train importers who focus a lot on older generation models over modern equipment. But now I have chosen to enjoy the somewhat limited models of modern equipment available & vote with my wallet.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,slivan

Naveen Rajan

You need to go to Strasburg Pennsylvania. There is a working steam engine that runs most of the time.

 

Stasburg RR

 

DSC00869

Denny,

I am not sure if seeing a steam locomotive in person would make me appreciate it more. Here is a photo I took when I visited the Henry Ford museum in 2006. This C&O Allegheny was one of the biggest displays to the extent I still remember the visit. I read the plaque & watched the video of the locomotive arriving under its own power to the museum but it was not compelling enough to make me learn more about it or to buy an O-Scale model. I agree that the 1601 was not operational but I was aware of some excursion trains at the museum on that day that might have included an operational steam locomotive but I was not interested in walking over & getting inspired by a working steam locomotive. For many years I used to live just 2 hours away from where the Pere Marquette / North Pole Express ran & I was aware of the schedules & got recommendation from other train enthusiasts when I used to visit hobby shops in S.E. MI but it still didn’t interest me, even when I had another reason to drive past Owosso or Mt. Pleasant.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSC00869
bigkid posted:
p51 posted:
WestinghouseEMDdemoguy posted:
naveenrajan posted:

 " I have never seen an operating steam locomotive & because I have only been in the US for the last 15 years, I have no appreciation for or interest in steam locomotives & other historically significant but obsolete train models"

 

I would suggest to go online, find a local train excursion with a steam engine and go check it out.  Post your findings afterwards, willing to bet after you've seen one in action you'll change your position.

I'd be willing to bet that it won't. Seriously, I know plenty of people just like naveenrajan, for whom steam is meaningless in any context because they were born decades into the diesel era.

Many hobbyists are all about the new and little else.

I'd never met a train buff who didn't like steam as much as the newest diesels for most of my life, but in the last decade I've met a lot of them, all of whom are in their 40s or younger.

Once your focus group gets out of the baby boomers or older, you'd be surprised what spins the spurs of younger train buffs. I know I sure was.

I think that it is hard to make generalizations about almost anything people are interested in. There are young people out there, I have seen them at car shows, that are into the whole 1950's car thing, the hot rods, the clothing, you name it, yet they were born many decades after the 1950's...by the time they were growing up, the era of hot rods a la American Graffitti was long gone, yet they embrace it. There is a show called Lead East, that happens every labor day literally within earshot of where I live, and they feature doo wop groups and such, have the old cars from that era, yet it attracts a lot of people in their 20's and 30's. 

I grew up long after steam locomotives were only seen in old movies and pictures, other than maybe excursion engines, yet I was fascinated by them (I am in my 50's).  People still come across pictures of them, and from watching little kids at train shows, they seem to love the steam engines they see running, and I can understand why. Steam Engines were dirty, noisy, hard to maintain, rough on the crews, diesels are easier to operate, cleaner, easier on the crews, and it is why railroads switched. On the other hand, Steam Engines are just plain interesting looking, Diesels are marvels of engineering and design, but they are relatively plain, steam engines because they are noisy, with steam pouring out of the valves, siderods moving, the steam whistle, they look more like some prehistoric beast then something produced on a production line and I think kids see that and are attracted, much like they are with dinosaurs. 

Sure, there will always be those who want to model what they see, but there are also a lot who are fascinated by things that came before. I ran into it myself, I finally broke down and bought a tube amplifier to match the turntable I have and a collection of records I have scrounged far and wide, and sitting there listening to the music, with all the pops and clicks, and seeing the glowing tubes, is fun (and I am not going to argue whether solid state amps are more efficient, less noise, that cd's and digital music is 'noiseless', that a good solid state amp is just as 'warm', that isn't what this is about).  It simply is some people I think will always be fascinated by trains. I love the pictures and such people post on some of the threads about old NYC, yet I grew up long after the railroads were a shadow of what they were, I never saw the Els (other than the third avenue extension that ran in the Bronx until the 70's, the one that did this crazy up and over of the Cross Bronx)..

So I do think that steam engines will still be produced as toys and models and some will like them, even young people. It is funny when I hear posts complaining that young people aren't interested in things like rail societies and such, many of the people in those groups when they were young were not exactly hanging out at rail historical societies, they were dating, watching tv, listening to music, drinking with friends, and doing the things that kids and young adults do, in the 1950's they were all hooligans going to be motorcycle gang members, in the 1960's they were either hippies spaced on acid, terrorists of the Weather Underground, or were zombies in front of the tube...more importantly, I don't think kids are zoomed out zombies, but I think that many of those groups do nothing to attract young people, either. Many of them, and I have seen rail historical groups in action, don't exactly reach out to younger people, there is a branch near where I live, where the guys spend time restoring old rail equipment, and while some of the guys were really friendly and forthcoming, a lot of them were clannish and cliquish and quite honestly, turned me off (I was in my 30's at the time), as if I was trying to enter some sort of secret society..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bigkid,

There was this dainty steam locomotive at Amtrak station in downtown Galesburg for the Railroad Days celebration during the last 2 years. It used to move forward & rearward over & over. So I got to hear it & smell it but I was just annoyed by the distraction as I was there to watch the BNSF switching moves, the Amtrak California Zephyr & Amtrak Southwest Chief that would stop by in the evenings. But there were other enthusiasts who couldn’t get enough of this locomotive. I even eavesdrop on their conversations with the crew while waiting for BNSF & Amtrak trains. I could sense their passion for this steam locomotive but it didn’t rub off on me. All I took away from that experience are that train hobbyists have diverse interests within the same hobby, some like older trains, while others like me just like modern trains.

These are just my opinion,

Thanks,

Naveen Rajan

Photo from 2014

0IMG_3973 [1024x768)

Photo from 2015

20150627_155012

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_3973 (1024x768)
  • 20150627_155012
Davy Mac posted:

Yip,many British diesels were complete junk ,absolutely true, however that wasn't true of the Deltics which used marine engines and were the most powerfull single diesel units in the world when introduced onto the London-Edinburgh run in the 60s...

 Deltics - one of the sounds of my childhood....and steam too. They never would have made it to the USA, but they thought of it; even added a paint job just in case.

Deltic blue

No worries, I think. Steam concepts will be around for a long time, and the specialized knowledge will be retained. (Even if only by the power plant/turbine operators and the general live steam crowd)

 

 

Pittsburger posted:

From what I have seen, I am a youngster on the forum (being 23). I personally am fascinated by steam locomotives. In my growing collection of motive power, I only have one diesel which is Bessemer. Both my father and grandfather worked for the Bessemer and up until this past winter, I had never seen a live steam locomotive. I have seen lots of steam locomotives on permanent display...

-Marc 

Marc,

 Glad that at least someone here is younger than most of us. On a personal note, my grandfather worked for WABCO and US Steel.

 Tom 

ChiloquinRuss posted:

Locally we are in an old logging heritage area.  So the question is more of what old technologies will kids know about?  Well as long as their are old fuddy duddy's like us to SHOW them old technologies THEY will live a long time!    Russ

Old Logging Museum in operation  

I got to run this steamer some years ago !  I was at college with the guy (Brian) who currently operates and maintains it. It has operated regularly at regional events.

IMG_2609

https://youtu.be/S5Bpt21V5H4?t=248   (I'm not in the pic or video)

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_2609

I think there will be an interest in steam, I didn't grow up with it and my father was not into trains at all.   But for some reason they captured my interest and I think they will continue to do so with certain people.   It's not nor will it be everyone's thing but for some.....it will.  Earlier Lee mentioned the B_17s going unnoticed by a group of people,  well they didn't interest everyone back in 1943 either,  same with steam engines back then.  I think today and in the future steam engines, B_17's, P51s or a 57 chevy are going to draw a select few in....not all but some.  Just my 2 cents. 

I agree Chris, I don't think that modern diesels and electrics have the same "kind" of appeal as steam, but the older I get and the more I'm exposed to the modern scene I can understand the appeal of the raw power of big US diesels etc., . However I find myself more attracted to modern european electric locomotives. When it comes to power those brutes just walk away with huge loads. I recently visited Holland and Germany ,watched a single modern "taurus" electric loco at a level crossing just walk away from a standing stop with a huge long train of cement cars, no wheel slip or any sign of effort other than the whine of motors, . Modern Chinese and Japanese electric locomotives are impressive too.  Here in the UK , preserved steam locomotives have pretty much established themselves as part of the modern scene. OK ,you don't see them in workaday service as in the steam era proper ,and the infrastructure that went with steam is long gone, but steam does appear on the mainlines on specials fairly regularly these days. In Scotland we have the Fort William to Mallaig line (the Harry Potter line) steam worked daily throughout summer and now the re-opened Borders railway out of Edinburgh has  summer steam working. In England there are umpteen locations to see steam both on preservation lines and on mainlines. 

 

A co-worker is a big fan of busses. Seriously, he's restoring some 1950s greyhound bus and knows the data on any bus.

Today, at lunch, I saw him taking photos with his cell of a standard (to me) local city bus going by. He went nuts. I walked over and he said something like, "Wow, you never see [insert maker and model # here] out this way!" He expected me to share his enthusiasm and I said, "I get it spins your spurs, and that's great, but busses aren't a big thing to me."

You'd have though I just told him there was no Santa Claus. He said, "How can anyone not be excited by seeing a [repeat of the maker and model #]? I mean, how is that even possible?"

To him, it isn't.

I couldn't help but think of this thread.

p51 posted:

A co-worker is a big fan of busses. Seriously, he's restoring some 1950s greyhound bus and knows the data on any bus.

Yep, never understood the bus fans. I've always had a dislike for buses since they replaced my local branch line train several decades ago. I guess we're looking at your co-worker the way a lot of folks look at us train nuts, but as long as we're around, the interest in the artifacts will be there somewhere.

A local group in my area restored a trolley bus and did a great job, but the bus is needing a museum. A local factory had a PCC trolley car on display for years and then scrapped it out of hand without as much as a word to the local history groups. Neither item are favorites of mine, but there is that dilemma of deciding what can be affordably preserved. 

Firewood posted:
p51 posted:

A co-worker is a big fan of busses. Seriously, he's restoring some 1950s greyhound bus and knows the data on any bus.

Yep, never understood the bus fans. I've always had a dislike for buses since they replaced my local branch line train several decades ago. I guess we're looking at your co-worker the way a lot of folks look at us train nuts, but as long as we're around, the interest in the artifacts will be there somewhere.

A local group in my area restored a trolley bus and did a great job, but the bus is needing a museum. A local factory had a PCC trolley car on display for years and then scrapped it out of hand without as much as a word to the local history groups. Neither item are favorites of mine, but there is that dilemma of deciding what can be affordably preserved. 

Dunno, but the Illinois Railway Museum has collected a pretty impressive array of busses and even has a functioning trolley bus route on the property.

I remember riding busses, both gas and trolley in Chicago.  Spent many a happy hour riding on 26th Street to go downtown Chicago to go shopping with my mom or grandma.   A real treat was coming back home on the "L" occasionally.

Busses were the way we got around back in the day, even after we moved to the 'burbs.  Used West Towns to get around.

Even though it's not an interest of mine, I'd be willing to ride a vintage bus today, particularly if it was an old Greyhound Scenicruiser.

Rusty

Last edited by Rusty Traque

Only those who see an operational steam engine in person.  I saw a Reading T1 when I was 7 and the memory of it is like it was 5 minutes ago.  Steam engines are huge with everything on the outside to see: huge drivers and drive rods.  In addition, they breathe, have sounds and smells.  It's something you don't forget, once you've seen it.

Ships are the same, when you see a big ship in reserve, it is cold, dead and inanimate - but when fully crewed with power up- a living, breathing entity.

So those who experience live steam - they will keep it alive.

I will always recall my boyhood days when everything was boring, old steam.

How we wanted to see one of these diesel thingies we had heard so much about. The head baggage attendent at CPR's Montreal West station told us one would be along later, heading The Canadian westbound.

It arrived. We were thrilled! At last . . . a diesel!

How things change!

The only diesel I have any joy in is the model of CP1800, an E8A.

You never forget your first love, eh?

I think that steam will continue to have a place in the American imagination, at least as long as at least SOME tourist and historical railroads keep running steam locomotives. It probably won't be as big a place as it is now or was twenty or thirty years ago, but it will be there.

I am a firm believer in living history museums, places that show how people lived, worked, and traveled in days gone by. I believe in things like pioneer farms, blacksmith shops, working water and grist mills, and covered wagon trains AS WELL AS steam locomotives and vintage passenger cars. I think people should be able to see and sense the way things were through their own eyes and ears, and not through the lenses of greedy film producers trying to make mega-bucks and willing to sacrifice accuracy for mega-bucks and cloistered academicians who don't bother to see where people and their technologies directly interact with each other.

 

This isn't a screed about PC or its right-wing equivalent. I have brickbats to throw in all directions.

 

Mister_Lee posted:

I think that steam will continue to have a place in the American imagination, at least as long as at least SOME tourist and historical railroads keep running steam locomotives. It probably won't be as big a place as it is now or was twenty or thirty years ago, but it will be there.

 

There are a lot of posts along the lines that interest in steam models is dissipating because real steam locomtives aren't really around.  This hypothesis is really saying:  people have an interest in the overall subject matter (toy trains) but not one specific aspect of it (steamers) because that one aspect doesn't appear in real-life.  I don't think this holds true.  At least not as a rule.

I grew up in NYC in the late1980s - 1990s. I never saw a steam engine, and I never even saw a diesel.  Only ELs and subways.  Yet, I love steam engines.  

In terms of other examples, all we saw growing up were Hondas, Toyotas and BMWs.  On rare occasion, you might see a Ferrari TestaRosa, 1978 Camaro or Firebird.  Yet, tons of people from my generation grew up to revere, buy and restore 1960s muscle cars.  I know people younger than I from Europe that didn't even grow up with American cars and have gone on to buy Cobra kit cars and all kinds of true 1960s muscle cars.

Yet another example - I own a sizable comic book collection comprised mostly of books from the WWII era, and most books feature characters that were never to be seen again after 1947 or so.  There are thousands of comic book collectors just like me that like the general subject matter (comic books), did not grow up with the specific aspect that is no longer seen (e.g. Captain Marvel Jr., Doll Man, The Spectre) and yet are aficionados.  There is a poor counter-argument that collectors of comic books from this era have plateaued in number, but this is a different conversation.  We're discussing here whether someone needs to grow up with something to have a connection to it.  And there are countless examples that say 'no.' 

I frankly think people who say they've never seen one and so they, therefore, have no interest in the models are often of a very specific mindset.  Seems like there were so many people in school of a similar mindset that just couldn't understand why they taught things that 'didn't matter in the real world' (and therefore couldn't relate).  Things like Calculus, history, physics and philosophy.  Go figure ...

I did not read all replies, this may have been brought up before my reply, the issue of replacement cast parts and assemblies, and availability of patterns and OEM drawings. In the past I redesigned weld fabricated parts to replace cast parts, cast parts were OEM from the 1930's through the early 1950's, it was cost prohibitive to cast as single or small quantity of parts even if the patterns were available, and the shape and functionality of the welded fabricated parts were compatable( not a mirror copy) of the cast part. Problems arise when the cast part cannot be made from a weldment or the structure would require a complicated and expensive modification if a fabricated part was substituted, if the part must be cast the pattern must be available( in acceptable condition for part casting) or remade, and a foundry  to pour a specified grade of steel, the material charactistics and mechanical properties of cast steels today and melting processes as compared to the origional OEM locomotive specifications from the 1900 thru 1950 should result in a stronger cast parts or in a stronger weld fabricated parts that are stress relieved. Part replacement and the inherent cost of replacement/maintence coupled with Federal Rail Safety Regulations or not, the availability of coal/water and track conditions, the total operating costs verses revenue, personnel forces to operate/repair/maintain these locomotives and public interest will influence the viability of actual running steam operations in the future or whether all steam locomotives will become static displays. I am 66 and remember the late steam era, the smell of burning coal, the sound of steam and chugging, and majesty of the working parts on a steam engine is something to see and admire in my opinion. 

Last edited by John Ochab

I know exactly what Naveen is describing. How about some of the steam engine fans go to the tractor events and see the old steam tractors run. They are interesting for sure. They do not sway any interest I have or, actually don't have in them.

 I do admire steam engines on RRs. I rode the excursion for the 765. It was fun. It did not bring me closer to steam. Now a cab ride may have been the ticket! I am amazed at their power, size and weight.

 The masses must settle for knowing there's a steam engine up front. At the end of the day does it matter if it's a diesel pulling the train? It's still a train ride. I would fully support any steam excursions that I can. I feel that someday, they may all just be museum pieces for cost reasons.

 We have a beautiful Train station ( Central Terminal) in Buffalo rotting away. They are pulling their hair out trying to find uses for it. They are maintaining it finally. There was no interest in restoring it to it's intended purpose of being a transportation hub (trains.... duh?). With a 7 million dollar investment to build it back in the 20's or 30's, there's only the bottom line now. I can't help but wonder when that will spread to the rest of the golden era of trains, letting them fade into history. Thank God that some preservationists saved the Grand Central Terminal! Enjoy all the opportunities that are here for our enjoyment. There seems to be some good things happening with steam right now. I fear that it will slip into history.

John Ochab posted:

I did not read all replies, this may have been brought up before my reply, the issue of replacement cast parts and assemblies, and availability of patterns and OEM drawings. 

--------------------------------------------------True words indeed. I've seen workplace-related problems recently where a manufacturer would not do small runs of any casting. The economics were not there. Some foundry companies these days will want a run of 500 pieces and then send the order past their shut-down North American foundries straight to China. One that I know of does limited-run castings, but only for alloy heavy-wear items requiring that tight metallurgical control. Cast iron is out the window to the Far East.

I think nowadays a foundry company and a restoration enterprise would both balk at the costs involved with a one-off valve and cylinder casting. 

 

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×