Skip to main content

2642B917-B5F1-4997-8B9F-1480BFB3D05EFB541CAD-E140-4A95-A631-74A575D9FF33Here is one I took from today 

Catenary poles for the trolley have been relocated and it’s now possible to get a picture pole free of the engineers side of the locomotive . 

  I would sure like to see this back on rails pulling excursions from Calgary to Banff or Lake Louise and back.

   That’s my fantasy as was seeing a UP Big Boy back running again lol

   Second picture includes my personal assistant Lola

Al

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 2642B917-B5F1-4997-8B9F-1480BFB3D05E
  • FB541CAD-E140-4A95-A631-74A575D9FF33

Lew, Very nice real-life shots. I saved them all because they are instructive, giving excellent examples of the terrain in which RRs can be set. The natural colors are especially informative, also, with the rocks and bridge you shared with us....P000124 ...being images worth trying to attain on a layout, IMO.

Your photos have helped assure me I did not overdo my weathering of the layout bridge seen here; however, I can see from your photo that I could have been bolder with weathering this bridge...IMG_5138 Also, I always felt I should have/could have given the bridge abutment some serious weathering and regret that I did not, especially judging from your photograph. I appreciate your contribution of these photos to this thread very much, indeed.

FrankM

Attachments

Images (2)
  • IMG_5138
  • P000124
Last edited by Moonson
Moonson posted:

Lew, Very nice real-life shots. I saved them all because they are instructive, giving excellent examples of the terrain in which RRs can be set. The natural colors are especially informative, also, with the rocks and bridge being images worth trying to attain on a layout, IMO.

Your photos have helped assure me I did not overdo the bridge, here,IMG_5138 but I always felt I should have/could have given the bridge abutment some weathering and regret that I did not.

FrankM

Yup, your bridge is just right wrt weathering. B&O and WM is/were very interesting examples of mountain railroading between Pittsburgh and Cumberland. Gentle grades for many miles following the Youghiogheny River on the West and heavy short grades on the East getting up to Sand Patch and Deal. That was my stomping grounds for 11yr and I'm sorry now I didn't take a lot of pics but that was mostly pre-digital and film was expensive.

Lew

Heading towards 101:

       IMG_0870

7yr old gazer looking for a train somewhere between Liberal, Ks and Dalhart, Tx.

        IMG_0871

Aha!

       IMG_0872

And yes, on the Rock Island. I can't tell from the pic whether those are passenger cars or box cars because of the dust. That dust makes me think he's really rolling so that may well have been The Imperial. From the. shadows it was noon-ish and that agrees with my 1958 Rock Island time table and it would have been very much like my Dad to plan a roadside lunch stop at the right time to catch a passenger train.

Lew

Attachments

Images (3)
  • IMG_0870
  • IMG_0871
  • IMG_0872
geysergazer posted:

 

        

       IMG_0872

. . . I can't tell from the pic whether those are passenger cars or box cars because of the dust.

Lew

It's a passenger train, all right, and I would agree with you that it is the Imperial.  Taking a look at the track, you can see why it was always a rough ride on the Rock Island.  But it was a fast rough ride.

And as an aside, last weekend marked 39 years since the Rock Island shut down forever.

Last edited by Number 90

A few posts earlier, Geysergazer commented about the relationship between the experimental oil-fired steam-turbine electrics GE built for Union Pacific and the gas-turbine electrics GE built for UP a number of years later.  Other than having 'turbine' in the name (and the same builder), I'm not sure there was much of a descendancy, was there?  The first experimental turbines were basically small 'conventional' thermal powerplants, using oil to heat water to produce high pressure steam to drive the steam-turbine coupled to a generator.  IIRC, these never got beyond test-driving the 'look what I built' stage.  The gas-turbine electrics (GTELs) were based on an actual combustion turbine (think jet engine) to spin the generator.  UP had something like 55 GTELs in three versions and a lot of revenue miles.  As a kid I saw many of the GTELs in action and in my mind, I had imagined them being powered by the thrust of the jet turbine.  Not so, of course - only later learning that they were actually turbine-electrics.

Apparently the UP/GE experimental steam-turbine locos actually had a closed steam loop with an air cooled condenser stage (one wonders what the Carnot efficiency was when it wasn't moving...).  The GTELs did actually have a successor - albeit a short-lived UP built coal-fired combustion turbine (whose failure mode you'd think would have been predictable - finely divided coal ash played heck with the turbine blades). 

richs09 posted:

A few posts earlier, Geysergazer commented about the relationship between the experimental oil-fired steam-turbine electrics GE built for Union Pacific and the gas-turbine electrics GE built for UP a number of years later.  Other than having 'turbine' in the name (and the same builder), I'm not sure there was much of a descendancy, was there?   

Sure there is a lineage and important connections and similarities between the original steam-turbine-electrics (STELs we might call them) and the fleet of later gas-turbine-electrics (GTELs). The STELs were first assemblage of the idea into an operable locomotive and the GTELs thus descended from that idea. Both used electric transmission re-purposed from diesel-electric technology. Both were an attempt to re-purpose existing technology/hardware for railroad traction. In the end both were a flash-in-the-pan. For many years UP management was enthralled with giant locomotives but the assembly-line F/GP/SD units have triumphed. The GTEl fleet at least worked but could not ultimately compete against the [modern] Diesel-Electric which was, after all, designed and developed from the ground up for railroad traction. EMD quickly gave up on the Winton engines because they were an attempt to re-purpose marine machinery. Alco had similar experience with the 539 which was a marine engine.

Lew

geysergazer posted:
lee drennen posted:

B88C474B-5622-4651-90E0-BC82F9FAA6EDEarly pick up this morning downtown St.louis 

Lee, you made me think of the time I rode shotgun with my friend Jim hauling   stainless coils into NYC. He had to back a 53' covered wagon clear into a building and up to a dock, turning 90 degrees to the two-lane city street in the process.

Lew 

Lew

I know the feeling I deliver in the city now I had to quit the road runs for my company after 23yrs with them due to my arthritis in my hips and knees  now they let me run the city all day and I love it this was a very tight place to get in it reminds me when I use to run to New York City back in the early 90s when I first started driving a truck. 

briansilvermustang posted:

 

 

 

 

Thanks for posting Brian! I believe this is at WABIC interlocking, Decatur, IL. looking East. The tall building in the background looks like the A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. Office building, to the right of the smoke stack. The switch and the signal directly in front is the lead running from the Wabash RR to the B&O yard.

Rusty

Last edited by Diverging Clear
briansilvermustang posted:

 

 

That’s a fabulous picture, Brian. Do you remember where you were when you took it???  

But seriously, do you have any additional info on the scene??? It looks like the “bus” says NYNH&H (New Haven, I assume), but the sign on the building in the background says Ferry to Newburgh which could be Newburgh, NY which makes it seem like the tracks would be on the Hudson Line, possibly near Beacon, NY (there is still a Beacon - Newburgh Ferry). I didn’t think the NH ran on the Hudson Line. Hopefully, one of our resident historians (@MELGAR) will chime in.

Thanks for sharing.

Last edited by Apples55

Wow. Talk about an idea whose time never came. Lookit' that tare weight! Containers doomed that setup. To be fair though, while containers have an extra advantage wrt railroad tare weight the opposite is true of trucks+containers. Stackable containers with truck tailer chassis under them are heavier than truck trailers. It's real easy to be overweight on the highway.

Lew

briansilvermustang posted:

Whatthe….???!! ......could that man possibly have been doing under there that would have made any difference whatsoever. I mean, look at his - at anybody's - delicate hands (compared to tons of iron?metal!!!) And whoever sent him there to do that should have been arrested for reckless endangerment and for being a total fool.

I'm serious. It takes a great deal to get me ticked-off , but that endangerment of that poor worker is criminal. IMunHO.

FrankM

 

 

Last edited by Moonson
Moonson posted:

TRUMPTRAIN, What a spectacular view! No exaggeration. When I saw that photo of part of your layout, my mouth fell open, for real. And yes, that pun was intended - your modeling is "for real"!!

Frank - I can't begin to tell you how much your words mean to me!  I consider you as one of  great gurus of imaginative scenery creation and your feedback on this photo deeply inspires me and makes my day!!   Much appreciated!  Thank you!!!  

Moonson posted:
briansilvermustang posted:

Whatthe….???!! ......could that man possibly have been doing under there that would have made any difference whatsoever. I mean, look at his - at anybody's - delicate hands (compared to tons of iron?metal!!!) And whoever sent him there to do that should have been arrested for reckless endangerment and for being a total fool.

I'm serious. It takes a great deal to get me ticked-off , but that endangerment of that poor worker is criminal. IMunHO.

FrankM

 

 

I am trying to figure out what he is doing. I hope that break was set. If that jack would kick out that fellow will get his back broken. Besides how old is the poor old fellow looks to be in his seventies.  It is a very hard way to make a living , it must have been a dangerous life to live in those days.

Last edited by John Pignatelli JR.
trumptrain posted:
CoastsideKevin posted:
trumptrain posted:

For today: " The View from My Office Window " IMG_1883

Never get tired of looking at your amazing layout, Patrick. 

Coastsidekevin -  Thank you so much for such a wonderful compliment!  I'm totally thrilled that you receive such personal enjoyment from my photos!

Loved your story on the other thread about the boys who saw your layout. It takes a pretty spectacular layout these days to awe the young generation - good on you!

briansilvermustang posted:

Brain - this photo captures that very special experiential moment that so many of us have had as young kids!  Nothing like it!  We all try, and hopefully succeed, in connecting with this little kid inside all of us each time we play with our trains.  Just look at that little guy.  No scenery.  Just a simple loop of track and a train.  His imagination must be going wild!   What fun!!  Thanks for sharing Brain!  

TrainMan1225 posted:

Just a boy and his trains...

Getting a Lionel Pennsy Flyer Set in Christmas of 2010, at 6 years old.

Nearly 9 years later, I still have all parts of this set, and most are still functional!

That was my first set! Good ol Pennsylvania Flyer! Had to repair mine and buy a second identical set for parts/replacement gondola and boxcar at the Greenberg train show. The cars got damaged from being left on the floor at Christmas and the Engine got cotton snow in the gears but I got the 8632 running again. This was after my Uncle tried to fix it but passed away before he could complete the project. It’s my most cherished train due to the close connection to my Uncle John, my dad, and my grandmother. I always think they’re smiling down from heaven when I run that train. 

Here's a couple of pics this week. I was working with some recruits on auto x and air bags. Both the training sites are by the BNSF lines. It's a great place to sit back and watch trains. 

20190614_153940

20190614_15393920190614_13493020190612_143755

And last is STAIN. 

20190614_150934

I did miss a Illinois Central engine that day. My phone was in the cab of the truck. I have not seen them run through Lincoln before. Have a great weekend.  Nick T.

Attachments

Images (5)
  • 20190614_153940
  • 20190614_153939
  • 20190614_134930
  • 20190612_143755
  • 20190614_150934

Great pictures everyone, and T8AFAO, neat BNSF pictures and the graffiti writing on the hopper car, wow, Briansilvermustang, Great Pictures Of the Kansas City Southern diesel in the work shop disassembled, P51 Lee, Great Pictures from your recent vacation trip, Wow, Bill T, great commemorative diesel, red/white/blue, and your scenic details, very nice, Trumptrain, Patrick W, very nice pictures, very colorful scenic details, the man getting on the J, very nice, Number 90, Tom, I like your historical answers and comments on the real trains, nice, Toledo Ed, I like your #21 WM Diesel on your nice layout, (I see Mark Boyce has one of those WM Diesels also), Randy Harrison, I really enjoy seeing your Locomotive pictures and on your Post picture, are you playing a French Horn, I used to play French shorn in our High School band...Great Thread, Wonderful Memories....Happy Fathers Day OGR Friends....6421A1CE-E943-4F27-8E17-A6C3C01933BE184A3A1F-D161-4929-9793-E0C4317EA215BE45026E-04C7-4E19-A99F-CBE7B2FF2CCBF96A3831-EFAA-4471-8675-D7E3FCF1D73A81D9EF4C-57A3-4968-A384-9F274E14411E003B3403-6C59-4D02-A371-15CE78EC22A7B6ACA3DA-3840-45B9-B91A-5159F9AA26C1

Attachments

Images (7)
  • 6421A1CE-E943-4F27-8E17-A6C3C01933BE
  • 184A3A1F-D161-4929-9793-E0C4317EA215
  • BE45026E-04C7-4E19-A99F-CBE7B2FF2CCB
  • F96A3831-EFAA-4471-8675-D7E3FCF1D73A
  • 81D9EF4C-57A3-4968-A384-9F274E14411E
  • 003B3403-6C59-4D02-A371-15CE78EC22A7
  • B6ACA3DA-3840-45B9-B91A-5159F9AA26C1
briansilvermustang posted:

 

 

NOW you're talkin'!

That picture was taken by one of my longest-term model railroad friends: Dr. Mike Condren.

Mike took that photo in Van Buren, AR (one of my favoritist Frisco locations) in the mid-sixties near dusk. You're looking at the last months of the "Meteorite" passenger being pulled by FP7 #5047 as it heads north to connect with the "Meteor" at Monett/Springfield, MO. ("Meteorite" was a slang term for the little train, for it was a split off of the "Meteor" further north.)  Over in the hole is an extra freight waiting for the Meteorite to pass.

That particular day, the Meteorite was longer than typical, for I recall Mike telling me it was doubling as a business train that day.

The Meteorite passed into history in September, 1965.

Andre

Last edited by laming

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×