Conventional only. As Lee said, my railroad...my rules.
I do occasionally run conventional on the club layout as the secondary mainline is set up to support conventional operation. Haven't run conventional at the club for over a year, but have run some of my Proto-1 engines at home.
When the club members aren't around, I secretly break out some 2-rail track and run my little Sunset 44-tonner. I also run my scale-wheeled engines on DC from time to time just for laughs and giggles. Don't tell anyone -- they're threatening an intervention.
I have DCS on my layout but in the last year have found some great deals on PS1 equipment so I run both.
I really enjoy running a PS1 loco and a PS2 loco on the same track one in conventional and the other in command...you have to constantly monitor the track voltage and the speed of the DCS loco.
I have both command (TMCC and DCS)- and conventional-equipped engines (Postwar, MPC and up). So I run in both modes, using either the DCS or CAB1 remote for command, and the DCS remote for conventional (use the Z-4000 remote base that the DCS remote talks to ramp up the transformer voltage and the variable channels on the TIU to vary the track voltage. Works like a charm.
I run conventional only. I have a number of command locos but that's because I wanted them and had to accept the added cost of them (from having command capability) to get them.
One can have a great time running conventional (starter sets included) at a fraction of the cost of command. I am an old postwar guy, so I suppose that fact colors how I feel about it, but I enjoy running my cheap trains every bit as much as my expensive ones. In fact, all the bells and whistles (and other sounds) prove to be annoying after awhile.
I have a small (4x8') table layout because that's all I have room for in a small extra bedroom, and with that size layout, command is really unnecessary anyway.
I have TMCC and some TMCC equipped locos, but I operate almost exclusively conventional.
Jeff Davis
I run my Standard Gauge tinplate conventionally, except for the Lionel Hiawatha which has TMCC. I collect ETS 0 gauge tinplate, which is all conventional. I have a few postwar and PWC engines, also conventional. The rest is all DCS, TMCC, and Legacy. The vast majority of my train running is with the modern remote systems, to the point where I don't even bother to test a new engine in conventional mode unless it's conventional-only.
Just under the Christmas tree
Legacy in the basement
My layout like my others here is set-up not only with Legacy/TMCC and DCS but I can run any like conventionally also. My elevated rail was built so I can run early tinplate. My portable layouts are set to run conventionally also. Just depends on what I want and my mood.
Conventional only. I have owned DCS & TMCC systems but still prefer handles.
My club is conventional only. It has to be rewired to run DCS. Starting to wire it for DCS a bit at a time. Over the last 30 years it has had a lot of changes and additions. The wiring is a mass of different gauges and busses done over years by different people.
If the Mighty Sound of Steam could be considered conventional, that's the majority on my displays. Sometimes I think my cheesy symphony of trains are offensive to both the conventional and command operators. But it's music to my ears. Bring your ear plugs when you stop by.
I maintain a roster of conventional WbB engines to run specifically on our club modular layout. Great pullers, cheap, and tough as nails. All of the brass and hi-end engines stay at home, except for just a couple of venues.
Honestly, at the Fair when people can't tell the difference between a WbB and a Lionel VL or MTH Premier, why bother? I did run my MTH Premier ES44AC N&W Heritage engine with the beer train briefly last week. Guy walks up and says " yeah, I had one of those cheap Lionel pieces of junk back in the 60s. Stopped running and my mother threw it away".
Sure you had a scale ES44AC in the 60s.... I just smiled.
Gilly
Yes • Still Run Conventional
The problem is that all four main lines are set to full power. I have a yard for conventional, with a toggle switch to turn the power on & off. If an error takes place, I have big time chaos, with run away engines.
A little of spending $350 to $1900 only to have it quit a few months later would go a long way with me.
Conventional only. My layout is 118 sq. feet, 174 ft. of Gargraves, 13 Ross switches.
Absolutely conventional operation, hands- on, manual switching! Cruise control and smoke are great features, sounds drive me nuts after a while. Virtually no breakdowns or gremlins. If you follow the forums, everyone complains about command this or dcs that. I just run'em and enjoy'em!
Me to I have gargraves manual and some atlas switchs.Never wanted remote control stuff.To many wires and before you know it.You will have a hardtime trying to remember which wire goes what and were.Me and my z4000 do just fine.And besides it like the real thing to go and flip that switch youself.
I run conventional only on 3 fastrack loops on 2 levels with Williams and modern Lionel engines. Trouble-free and always ready.
Most of my conventional equipment is Lionel Trains Inc. motive power, as well as some MPC, postwar and current Lionel. Oh yes, and some Williams.
I run them the conventional way now, but I do like the way MTH's DCS can control them...
Jerry, my Mom's childhood areas were Chestertown and Betterton, do these little towns still exist?
Sure do, haven't been to Chestertown in ages tho but if it's like the rest of Maryland it's probably being developed all to H**l. The Eastern Shore has really changed alot especially in the last 10 years, it's kinda sad.
Jerry
Conventional via ZW 75%, TMCC Trainmaster (remote control for conventional engines) 25%, regular TMCC rarely.
It just isn't as much fun if I don't have my hand on the throttle!
Legacy/TMCC is like an automatic transmission. I'll only buy it when I cannot get the engine/car I want without it.
Nathan