Skip to main content

I had previously posted about a Malwarebytes issue at this forum.  The folks at Malwarebytes got back to me, and their comment was that is was not my computer, but rather "Block is for malvertising".  They pointed me to this link.

Malvertising' Crooks Earn $25,000 A Day Attacking Yahoo And AOL Users

They also said they saw no sign of any issue on my computer, and I had done full scans with MB and Panda AV.  I also cleaned all the cookies and temp files.

If others are seeing this, I wouldn't be so quick to blame it on an infected computer, it's not clear what exactly was happening.  In any case, they didn't say anything about false positives with Malwarebytes, so I'd be interested in where Rich got that information.

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

The "False Positive" info is from Malwarebytes themselves:

https://forums.malwarebytes.or...ic/179427-209866020/

Though I work in this industry and I would not say it is a false positive.  Major security sites and scanners have home.earthlink.net listed as compromised and currently retained on their block lists:

https://sitecheck.sucuri.net/r...s/home.earthlink.net

In any case the issue is not with this forum.   Certain users' signatures include a link to their personal webpage hosted at earthlink and that could be setting off Malwarebytes. 

Last edited by andy b

Outside of AV updates - I let no program auto update. None. It may prompt me to update - and I can make that choice - but nobody gets full reign to do as they want with my machine. Where did I learn this radical behavior??  Working as a Sys Admin in IT at a major defense contractor. The reasoning is simple: if an update harms or crashes a system - it's too late. Hence, any updates were applied to a 'test' system before being applied to production. That includes Microsoft, Adobe, and all the rest.

As a 1 computer guy - I don't have the luxury of multiple systems. So, I began watching whose stuff - especially internet apps - were constantly being updated. The biggest culprit? Adobe Flash. So I re-configured Flash to always prompt me for use, and I turned off auto-redirect. The payoff is that I have had absolutely zero virus infections since doing so - and my data usage has dropped by a full 30%.

I get it that sites need to make money. But! Heaving 50 Flash ads that all have to load and all have to dance around my screen is over bearing - and in some cases - a complete annoyance. Hence, by turning off Flash, I don't get all that intrusion happening. I know that cuts into a site's profits - but there has to be a better way.

FWIW - I dump all cookies - including Flash cookies - at the end of every browser session. And, I have a script that runs when I start my machine to clean out as much of Google's intrusion of privacy as possible. I own this machine. I control what is on it. And in that, I am entitled to a relative and appropriate amount of privacy.

 

"but rather "Block is for malvertising".  They pointed me to this link."

Malvertising' Crooks Earn $25,000 A Day Attacking Yahoo And AOL Users

Incidentally - you can't get to the Forbes link with cookies turned off - because Forbes wants to autoload some 30-day "trial" of some who-ha app on your machine. Of course - at the end of 30 days you are going to get dinged again and again to buy it. And don't doubt that it won't continue to track your every move.

Last edited by Mark440

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×