Skip to main content

OK... I'm sick of getting 18.4 or 18.2vac... then, immediately dropping to 17.8 or 17.6vac.   Which RMS Multi Meter are y'all using?   I'm sure that most of you have very expensive RMS M/Ms... but, is there a decent one out there in the 80-100 range that you would recommend?  Thanks... and, Rock On!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

You’re gonna have to up the anty if you want a something like a Fluke with true RMS, ……usually around 175-200 bucks,….like mentioned above, I’ve only ever used Fluke in the shops ……some of my Fluke meters are 30-40 years old now …..I have a 115 in the RR shop, it’s true RMS, ….I think I caught it on sale for like 169.99, ……something like that ….

Pat

OK... I'm sick of getting 18.4 or 18.2vac... then, immediately dropping to 17.8 or 17.6vac.   Which RMS Multi Meter are y'all using?   I'm sure that most of you have very expensive RMS M/Ms... but, is there a decent one out there in the 80-100 range that you would recommend?  Thanks... and, Rock On!

Dennis, it's a little unclear if the symptom you're describing is actually related to a non-RMS voltage reading or whether it's actually the differences between different readings on different meters, or with different loads applied to the same source.

True-RMS reading meters are designed to accurately measure AC voltage of non-sinusoidal waveforms (other than pure sine wave).  Chopped sine wave voltage output examples within our hobby would include MTH's TIU (as Alan mentioned) Z-1000, 750 and 500 Controllers, as well as Lionel's Legacy PowerMaster, CW-80, and others.

I'm guessing that the issue you're wanting to solve may either or also be related to the typical output voltage dropping from a source when an additional load is applied to it, explained by Ohm's Law.

Unless a meter has a low input impedance (option), its voltage readings of a source will still drop when a greater load (lower resistance) is placed on the source.  I had a Fluke 115 that I used for a long time and it is a very good meter, but it also has a high input impedance and will still give varied voltage readings with load changes. If you want to spend the money for a Fluke brand meter with the Low-Z option, then either the 114 (non-RMS), 116, or 117 do this.  Here is a link to Fluke's description of meters they offer with Low-Impedance:  https://www.fluke.com/en-us/le...-digital-multimeters

For many years now, I've  used a few $10 meters that I keep in various handy places and in vehicles.  Any of these will provide readings that are accurate enough for our purposes as long as the sources have a nominal load attached (a low impedance such as an incandescent bulb or low value resistor).  On my electronics workbench is where I keep my better test meters.

For occasional use, here are some other lower cost brands of True-RMS reading & Low-impedance meters that should be fine for our train related needs:  https://www.google.com/search?...mpedance+Low-Z+meter

Last edited by SteveH

Steve,  I understand that if I put different loads on the power district I will get different readings.  Right now I am talking no trains or other consumers within any particular power district.  I'm cleaning up the wiring after 5 or 6 major changes to the layout and buttoning everything up to start on Signals, Structures and Accessories and the less I have to go back and re-do the better.  Besides... I deserve a Fluke! 

Last edited by Dennis-LaRock

As I understand your issue, the 115 will not sufficiently load the output like you seem to want; it has a high input impedance.  Otherwise it's a good meter.

That being said, the 117 is about $20 more and has both features you seem to want (True-RMS and selectable Low or High input Impedance.  The 177 Gary mentioned, is also a great meter, has the same features as he 117 with Auto-Ranging, but close to $200 more.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×