Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Holy cats! Unless I'm missing something, that is some serious track with what appears to be significant access problems in case of inner track derailments, etc. I assume we're looking 3 or more levels of track. I'm not opposed to access problems, but then I like to learn the hard way. If the grid is 1', we're looking at reaching 5.5' to get to the black line tracks. One thing I notice right off is that while there is a way to get from the purple line to the green line, there is no way to get back without backing up. I'm not sure what else to comment on. Can I assume much of this will be passenger car trains?

I like running 5 trains at one time but I would like a yard. I also run 3 streets cars on the 2 streets track.  The only derailment I have had in 4 years is the streets cars & I am able to reach them with an extended arm.  The L is my farm & coal area.  If someone has a better idea for the layout leaving the table as it is I would love too see it.

 

Thank You, Ken

Originally Posted by Ken M:
I like running 5 trains at one time but I would like a yard. I also run 3 streets cars on the 2 streets track.  The only derailment I have had in 4 years is the streets cars & I am able to reach them with an extended arm.  The L is my farm & coal area.  If someone has a better idea for the layout leaving the table as it is I would love too see it.

Thank You, Ken

Cool. I hesitate doing something like this because all the naysayers tell me it will be nothing but trouble. I've had 2 designs criticized on other forums for that reason and nothing else. However, if I run on track I can easily reach and don't have problems, why should a longer reach cause a problem, especially with O gauge? I could see problems if there were a of turnouts out of reach, but I just don't see it with plain ovals. I understood the criticism when the layouts involved N and HO.
I am a little confused though because I didn't realize this design was already in operation. Given that it is already in operation and assuming you want to retain your farmland, I would look at the tracks around the short spur on the upper portion. If those are on the same level, it kooks like it would be easy to join the green, yellow, dark green and light blue track into a yard while still allowing unattended through traffic. It's kind of hard to offer more ideas with knowing track elevations or what else is in the room. An obvious solution would be to add a leg on the right side to contain a yard, but I tend to think that is not open space.

BTW, are there any pictures of the layout posted anywhere?

OK, accepting that you like to run five trains simultaneously on mostly concentric ovals, and you want to keep the existing tables ...

 

You might consider building a second level over one end or corner of the big table, about 3'x 11' or 5'x 5', with the existing mainline tracks tunnelling under. Having the trains disappear into tunnels for a bit adds some interest. Plus, you could build a separate "mountain division" railroad with sharp curves and grades on that second level, as a counterpoint to the big flat ovals with long straights and wide curves.

 

Wondering what's in that space lower left? If it isn't already filled up with a village or permanent scenery, you could ...

 

1) Build a "mountain division" there, instead.

 

2) Reverse loops to turn mainline trains around for operating variety.

 

3) Yard tracks, possibly with a balloon track for turning trains.

 

4) Double-track junctions off the mains branching into multiple balloon or loop tracks where entire trains can be laid over.

 

My own preference for yard trackage is to have a few long double-ended tracks that entire trains can pull in and out of, with switching optional.

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×