Skip to main content

yes, with many it is just watching trains run same as we did with family so many Christmas mornings, for so many wonderful years.  Only, now, the loops are enormous and it is with our grandkids.  Trains run on track, to the pleasure and delight of all, whether it be two rails or three.  But, the enjoyment is the same.... each to his own.   And, BTW, Mother Earth is a loop runner...……..

Jesse   TCA

After an initial review and agreement of my track plan I made a small deposit to show PDM that I am truly interested in their services.  They use their design software to calculate material cost and plot the layout incorporating the easements how best to construct and size each section for transporting and assembling the finished product.  

Part of next phase includes building a small scale mock-up to aid in visualizing the layout in 3 dimensions.  (I get to keep this when the layout is delivered)

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
Last edited by SantaFeJim
gnnpnut posted:

My HO railroad runs from staging yard to staging yard.  While I have reversing loops at both ends, they are only used to stage trains.  When operating, they are not required.  Passenger trains have to run at a scale 50 mph to maintain schedule. 

I operate on eight different railroads in the Chicagoland area, and none of them are "loops".  They are all convincing. 

 

How long are the mainlines?

PALALLIN, why do you think that mainlines are short on point to point layouts?  In HO, a scale mile is about 60 feet.  I operate on some HO layouts with mainlines that are at least 250 feet long (over 4 scale miles).  My own O-scale 3-rail layout is point to point with a 550 foot mainline (an O-scale mile is 110 feet).  One of the guys in town models the B&O in N-scale (33 feet to a scale mile) and his main line is almost 20 scale miles long.  These railroads all require a crew of 10 to 15 guys for an operating session.  The op sessions are social events and are loads of fun.

Back to Santa Fe Jims new layout.....

Jim it looks really cool...I'm curious as to why you went HO for the home layout?  I understand space considerations but you could put a pretty nice 0 gauge pike in 11x22....

I'd like to follow  but all the links take me to another forum that wants me to register before I could see your photos??

RD posted:

Back to Santa Fe Jims new layout.....

Jim it looks really cool...I'm curious as to why you went HO for the home layout?  I understand space considerations but you could put a pretty nice 0 gauge pike in 11x22....

I'd like to follow  but all the links take me to another forum that wants me to register before I could see your photos??

 

To do my track plan on 3-rail O-Scale would require approx. 44' x 22'.  It would be considerably cheaper but I cannot accommodate that foot print.

As for links to see the pictures?  News to me?  Nobody else mentioned any problems.

BTW - How is you build coming along?  I REALLY liked the track plan that you posted here in March/April of last year.

I will be posting more pictures as time permits.  Stay tuned.

 

 

 

Last edited by SantaFeJim

I like to see a model train running along at typical operating speeds - say 30 to 60 miles-per-hour - chuffing, whistling, clickety-clack. On a modestly-sized layout, the only way that can be done is in a loop. Completely acceptable to me. Just turn them on and watch them run. I would quickly become bored if I was limited to having switchers shuffling boxcars onto sidings at 5 miles-per-hour.

MELGAR

Last edited by MELGAR
Bob posted:

PALALLIN, why do you think that mainlines are short on point to point layouts?  In HO, a scale mile is about 60 feet.  I operate on some HO layouts with mainlines that are at least 250 feet long (over 4 scale miles).  My own O-scale 3-rail layout is point to point with a 550 foot mainline (an O-scale mile is 110 feet).  One of the guys in town models the B&O in N-scale (33 feet to a scale mile) and his main line is almost 20 scale miles long.  These railroads all require a crew of 10 to 15 guys for an operating session.  The op sessions are social events and are loads of fun.

People don't use trains to travel 4 miles.  Heck, I don't even use a car all the time to do 4 or 5 miles.  20 miles?  That's still a short, short-line.  There are industrial sites that have more than 4 miles of track on the same property.

My trains travel hundreds of miles, KC to Birmingham; St. Louis to Paris, TX; Carthage, MO, to Memphis; etc.  All in 5 x 10 feet.

I say enjoy your trains however you want to, but I want my trains to travel more realistic distances. 

I'm a looper AND a switcher. First I watch the Royal Gorge in the Summer of '64 make it's way from Pueblo to Provo on the loop of track around the perimeter of my 11X12 train room. Then I operate the present-day Titusville/Bradford/Petrolia/wherever Turn from interchange to town and back, setting out and picking up empties and loads at the several on-line industries.

 

All model railroading is caricature because we are always compressing huge geographic distances&features into a tiny fraction of the land travelled by any prototype except the shortest shortlines. One could accurately model the Strasburg Rail Road but that wouldn't be very exciting, would it? Caricature is a powerful tool, though, and the suspension-of-disbelief created by an effective model railroad gives great pleasure, amirite? 

 

Last edited by geysergazer
geysergazer posted:

 All model railroading is caricature because we are always compressing huge geographic distances&features into a tiny fraction of the land travelled by any prototype except the shortest shortlines. One could accurately model the Strasburg Rail Road but that wouldn't be very exciting, would it? Caricature is a powerful tool, though, and the suspension-of-disbelief created by an effective model railroad gives great pleasure, amirite? 

Lew

Absolutely. 

Mark in Oregon

SantaFeJim posted:
RD posted:

Back to Santa Fe Jims new layout.....

Jim it looks really cool...I'm curious as to why you went HO for the home layout?  I understand space considerations but you could put a pretty nice 0 gauge pike in 11x22....

I'd like to follow  but all the links take me to another forum that wants me to register before I could see your photos??

Rich - I know that I could have a decent O Scale layout in that space but, as you know, I already belong to a nice 3-Rail Scale club that has 60' x 36' layout.

To do my track plan on 3-rail O-Scale would require approx. 44' x 22'.  It would be considerably cheaper but I cannot accommodate that foot print.

As for links to see the pictures?  News to me?  Nobody else mentioned any problems.

BTW - How is you build coming along?  I REALLY liked the track plan that you posted here in March/April of last year.

I will be posting more pictures as time permits.  Stay tuned.

 

 

 

Jim,

I get it.... I'm glad you're not giving up on 0-Scale with all the beautiful  Santa Fe equipment  you have!  The photos I could see look great and the scale model is the nuts!

As for me I'm still  planning to build that plan.. I had a lot of help from the forum converting it to 0 from HO to fit my space and I have the plan in RRT .... still working on the room.. I want to make sure I have that done first and I had a couple of minor setbacks... I'm also struggling with the question.. build it myself or have it built by a professional builder??   I'm having problems visualizing the benchwork and how to handle the different levels... but I retired last January so now I have nothing but time and no more excuses.....

gnnpnut posted:
palallin posted:

People don't use trains to travel 4 miles.  Heck, I don't even use a car all the time to do 4 or 5 miles.  20 miles?  That's still a short, short-line.  There are industrial sites that have more than 4 miles of track on the same property.

My trains travel hundreds of miles, KC to Birmingham; St. Louis to Paris, TX; Carthage, MO, to Memphis; etc.  All in 5 x 10 feet.

I say enjoy your trains however you want to, but I want my trains to travel more realistic distances. 

Pallalin, based on your photograph, I'll assume that you do Civil War reenactments?  Using a similar analogy to your observations regarding the  "current mantra that point-to-point is more realistic" is akin to my saying that your Civil war activities are not realistic since you are not firing live rounds out of your small arms and artillery.  You make compromises in that hobby also, and I'm sure that your reenactment battlefields don't mimic the size of the real battles either. 

 

Certainly!  We don't eat rancid food, either, judging dysentery to be too authentic

That said, we all have to choose what compromises we make.  I want my trains to run long distances without stopping.  I will accept passing the same town numerous times to make that happen.

I say my way is better for me.  I say your way is better for you.  I will not say that either way is simply better.  Point-to-point is not better, which is the current mantra of the "voices" of the hobby.  It accomplishes a purpose loops cannot.  But they, in turn, accomplish a purpose point-to-point cannot.  And that statement was my point in responding to the thread.

Add Reply

Post
The Track Planning and Layout Design Forum is sponsored by

AN OGR FORUM CHARTER SPONSOR

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×