Skip to main content

@EMD posted:

Jonathan,

Nice units , Thanks for posting - Was the CNJ Red/White (Liberty) scheme produced

Thanks!  Only the as delivered scheme was produced.  While in CNJ service the GP7P wore 4 paint schemes with the "Red Baron" or "Coast Guard" scheme being applied in 1972.  I like that paint scheme as well.  A little out of era for my 2 rail equipment, but still an attractive scheme.  Not a lot of locomotives got that final scheme.  Some RS3s, 1 SD40, and a handful of the GP7Ps as I recall. 

The produced scheme known as the "Toothpaste" scheme was the longest lasting from 1952 to as late as 1964 on some units.  CNJ simplified the scheme in the early 60's to remove the stripes when units were repainted.  In the mid 60's CNJ adopted B&O colors for most of it's hood units while the cab units were being retired.

I hope another run will be in the future. I need some SP geeps and SD-7’s or -9’s. I’m just finally getting back to a position where I can once again spend money on trains. Been stuck on the sidelines for 9 or 10 years and missed out on a lot of cool stuff. Some of it is rather hard to find now.

I wouldn't be surprised, if Scott has enough standby reservations a second run of GP7/9 will be in the offering like the second run of F3

@SANTIAGOP23 posted:

If there’s a second run, I’d be nice to see some CB&Q red birds!

C919AE99-C796-4916-A0F7-E306C9099A95

Photographer credit K.B King Jr. Collection: Moss E. Hulsey.

I’d be in for one too !  Right now though,  the “Q” of offerings is pretty long - as are My reservations. And I’d like to see a second run of E5-6s before a run 2 GPs. I bet after giving the GPs a “rest” for awhile, we might eventually see a run 2.
Cheers !!!

@Former Member posted:


             2.)   Based on Prrhorseshoecurve's response to my post on ph3 GP9's:

                              I asked Scott M. Re phaseIII GP9 and his answer was a staunch NO WAY! Even if we ask to throw in the GP9 "B"units for UP, PRR, PC, CR.

                    I know of at least 5 guys (myslef included) who reached out about the ph3 version and all got a firm no.  I understand this run was apparently                              ph2 only, but I simply do not understand why ph3's cannot even be advertised to see the potential interest.   In addition, I actually held off on                              purchasing the NKP GP7's and ph2 GP9's due to not knowing if the the ph2 torpedo boats and ph3 versions for NKP would ever be made.   

All I am saying is it is hard to understand why certain models get advertised, then go into production, while some will not even be considered. I truly cannot understand the deciding factors, but to be 100% honest with you, it seems to me that it comes down to who is the most outspoken on this forum.

Hey, business is business, you guys are free to do what you think is best,  but I'm just telling you:  I went from a potential of having 8 different GP's to order to only getting 2 GP7's and no GP9's at all just as a result of how these decisions get made.   I'll leave you with this:  I still have quite a bit on preorder with Scott and I truly appreciate what you guys do for us in O scale - literally everything I have in B&O is from Sunset.  But I think you guys are missing out on alot of potential sales because of how the decision process gets implemented.

PS.  Those CNJ units are show stoppers BTW!

I'm now a bit confused, what exactly is a phase III GP9? I would have thought that the N&W versions which have 48" fans (and as shown on 3rdRail's advertisement) would be considered phase III. Yes, there are other things like vents on battery box doors and such.

Steve

@sdmann posted:

Just for some fun: Here's a picture of our warehouse with the 3R models matched up with invoices. We then go to each one, check again, put the UPS tags on them and slip the invoice in the box. Monday they went out.  When someone calls to say they will be away and to hold their shipment, we have to walk up and down the isles of boxes to find their order. It's very tedious.

Don’t people realize they can have it held at UPS or FedEx?  Sorry you have that extra hassle.

And great job BTW, that model Jonathan posted is beautiful.

@rplst8 posted:

Don’t people realize they can have it held at UPS or FedEx?  Sorry you have that extra hassle.

And great job BTW, that model Jonathan posted is beautiful.

My UPS  "my choice" wanted approx $5.00 or $10.00 upcharge depending on what option I chose to hold or change delivery place or time.  Not really "my choice"  as far as I can tell.  I took Friday off from work to get locos and they changed the delivery date to today on me...I prefer fed ex as they allow you to divert it and hold  package at a local drug store or dollar store for free.  Just my experience in my area..

Last edited by I'd rather be ice fishing

My UPS  "my choice" wanted approx $5.00 or $10.00 upcharge depending on what option I chose to hold or change delivery place or time.  Not really "my choice"  as far as I can tell.  I took Friday off from work to get locos and they changed the delivery date to today on me...I prefer fed ex as they allow you to divert it and hold  package at a local drug store or dollar store for free.  Just my experience in my area..

Shipping Anything has gotten Really Expensive !!!  They have their ways to 5 & 10 you. I’ve been told that many ups stores are franchise stores.  I guess these “extras” are how they boost income.
A train store that I deal with preferentially uses FedEx. He’ll only use USPS or UPS if necessary - like requested by buyer. Their (FedEx) rates are less expensive. The buyer wins obviously but the seller does too if selling via eBay - the eBay take % nicks shipping as if it’s no different than the shipped item.   I personally have moved to FedEx for shipping.  Has become my personal preference.
Just saying ... Do your own research.  😬
Cheers !!!

Last edited by TrainBub
@WinstonB posted:

UPS does charge for holding packages. I believe is a one time charge per year unless you join their premium service. I’m not sure if it kicks in after a certain number of holds. I did have quite a few holds last year and was charged once.

I have never been charged for a hold at the facility, but I have been charged to redirect and hold for pickup at the UPS store.

-Brian

@WinstonB posted:

UPS does charge for holding packages. I believe is a one time charge per year unless you join their premium service. I’m not sure if it kicks in after a certain number of holds. I did have quite a few holds last year and was charged once.

When I use UPS and have it delivered to my local UPS store, the UPS store charges me $8.00 per package for a "storage" charge.

My GP9 is being delivered to my house, which I didn't think I asked for, but that's that. The shipping notice says signature required, so I'll have to hang around the house all day Friday and watch for the truck, or else the Geep starts making laps on the UPS truck until I happen to catch it.

@superwarp1 posted:

Is this a thread on 3rdrail geeps or shipping costs/methods?  I'm confused

tootle2

This Golden Book, Tootle, a childhood favorite of mine, explains how distractions will tend to get us off track.

When I was asked to help Dad with a project, chores, repair of my this-and-that, et alia, ...and my mind and/or body would wander off elsewhere for a brief moment..., it was "HEY, TOOTLE!!  Over here!!  Focus!!"

At that age it was always easy to learn lessons about life when it was presented in a choo-choo manner!  After all, I was totally hooked by then...often to distraction.

And here we are, 70+ years later....

Meanwhile, 'back at the ranch'.....I believe the subject is geeps.  Love the pics!  They're all gorgeous!

KD

Attachments

Images (1)
  • tootle2
Last edited by dkdkrd
@Valpac posted:

Here is a quick photo my my SP GP-9.  The real 5623 doesn’t have the dynamic break (don’t know if it ever did), so I will likely renumber it to something more appropriate.  She’s a beauty none the less.  Sorry for the poor lighting.

-Brian

8BA08876-C267-4D20-8BBC-E9EA251AABB4

There's a lot about 5623 on the net. It was a dual purpose freight/passenger, no dynamic brake but it had torpedo tubes. It was also preserved, restored, and is in use on a tourist railroad.

Last edited by breezinup
@rplst8 posted:

Only need to change one digit... https://railpictures.net/photo/584590/

And here's one with the over/under lettering - https://railpictures.net/photo/642150/

Here's another with only a one digit change, and has over/under lettering - https://railpictures.net/photo/642397/

It’s not one digit, it’s one digit, SIX times.
That’s only assuming the numberboards don’t need to be completely redone.

I’m with Mario...why is this a user fix?

Last edited by Boilermaker1

1.  Phase III requires an additional shell mold ($$$$) for the larger radiator fans.

2.  Hold is many times a financial decision as much as who will be where when.  I get many of my things from financial holds that end up being cancellations.

3.  Blame Jonathan/us for the SP passenger units being freight units.  WE, the reviewers, probably screwed up creating the matrix which is supposed to differentiate.  Unless, SP passenger units were one of the variations the builder said no to and so an assumption was made,  by who knows who, to do freight units.  Yeah, that stuff happens and nobody knows it until they are here.  Very frustrating on all sides.

Scott

I'm sincerely happy you guys tried to do my GTW GP9's even though there were not enough orders, but I'm sorry to say they're terrible.
I mean, not even close.
Please know my criticism below is not personal.

Here's a photo of  a RedCaboose model approved by the railroad in the 1990s alongside your model (front)

Black roof? No. Never.
IMG_6363

The artwork for the logo is awful...

IMG_6364

Wrong red and number boards
Reds and Number Boards

Prototype refrences
GTW GP9 #4902 Battle Creek Shops, September 1983GTW GP9 4913 Griffith, IN Feb 76

I'm not angry Scott, just really disappointed.
I'm going to need a refund or a professional re-paint.
let me know what you can do.

Attachments

Images (5)
  • IMG_6363: Correct Red Caboose Unit with 3rd Rail Unit (front)
  • IMG_6364: Incorrect logo artwork
  • Reds and Number Boards
  • GTW GP9 #4902 Battle Creek Shops, September 1983
  • GTW GP9 4913 Griffith, IN Feb 76
Last edited by richtrow

If you google GT GP9s I see black cab roofs on several engines, but who am I to judge.

https://www.google.com/search?...imgrc=vn-KxCB0KhU_2M

Probably painted that way  to protect against rust in their later years.  I can't post those pictures here due to IP rules but I put the link up there. The return policy is in your paperwork. There were only 3 made, and I have someone waiting for one to become available. I am sorry your not happy with how we chose to paint them. But I am sure we can find a good home for her.

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×