So, will the sand dome be the correct larger one as shown on all the H8/9/10 pictures above or the smaller style like on the E6 and the older Lionel H9 from 10-15 years ago? Just curious, it will not affect whether I order one or not.
Nitpickers should be a heck of a lot more concerned about that fictitious cowcatcher then the sand dome.
Joe
I do not think there is anything fictitious about the cowcatcher since these engines had the cowcatcher at least into the mid-1920s or later. I think the cowcatcher is very appropriate on the Lines West engine, and on the PRR engines if you model pre-1930s. I'm pretty sure all 273 original H10 tenders were high sided, but many of the H10s that were rebuilt from H8/H9 engines kept their original low sided tenders.
My issue is I model the late 1940s and I have not seen any pictures of an H8/H9/H10 taken after the beginning of WWII where the engine had a cow catcher. Now that Dave and company have heard our concerns, I think I'm going to wait for the next release. Maybe they will go back to calling it an H9 with an H9 cab number, have a PRR engine with a high side tender, and replace the cow catcher with foot boards. I could live with a low side tender, especially if they call it an H9, but really want those foot boards.