Skip to main content

Originally Posted by jim pastorius:

Be grateful for small favors. If the ditch lights are the biggest issue things must be pretty good in the steam world. Now if only the West coast boys could/would get their act together !!

I agree with that. Having never seen her run before I was hoping to see her as she appeared before like everyone else. Just a bit bummed personally but I'll get over it.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Maybe it is an internal NS policy decision, as there is no FRA mandate requiring steam locomotives to have ditch lights. I remember going over that "issue" many years ago, with 4449's first operations on BN. Once it was calmly explained to the BN manager at their headquarters, that FRA diesel locomotives regulations did/do not apply to steam locomotives, plus those locomotives with operating "oscillating headlights", such as the original equipment Mars Light on 4449, the whole subject was dropped.

 

Maybe this is the reason that the Fort Wayne crew rebuilt the Mars light on the 765?

Originally Posted by Jdevleerjr:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Maybe it is an internal NS policy decision, as there is no FRA mandate requiring steam locomotives to have ditch lights. I remember going over that "issue" many years ago, with 4449's first operations on BN. Once it was calmly explained to the BN manager at their headquarters, that FRA diesel locomotives regulations did/do not apply to steam locomotives, plus those locomotives with operating "oscillating headlights", such as the original equipment Mars Light on 4449, the whole subject was dropped.

 

Maybe this is the reason that the Fort Wayne crew rebuilt the Mars light on the 765?

No, because as I recall the Mars Light on the 765 was a red warning light, and was activated by an emergency/penalty air brake application. 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Jdevleerjr:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Maybe it is an internal NS policy decision, as there is no FRA mandate requiring steam locomotives to have ditch lights. I remember going over that "issue" many years ago, with 4449's first operations on BN. Once it was calmly explained to the BN manager at their headquarters, that FRA diesel locomotives regulations did/do not apply to steam locomotives, plus those locomotives with operating "oscillating headlights", such as the original equipment Mars Light on 4449, the whole subject was dropped.

 

Maybe this is the reason that the Fort Wayne crew rebuilt the Mars light on the 765?

No, because as I recall the Mars Light on the 765 was a red warning light, and was activated by an emergency/penalty air brake application. 

I think your confusing the 261 with the 765.  The 765 had the clear light and the 261 had the red warning light.  

Originally Posted by Jdevleerjr:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Jdevleerjr:
Originally Posted by Hot Water:

Maybe it is an internal NS policy decision, as there is no FRA mandate requiring steam locomotives to have ditch lights. I remember going over that "issue" many years ago, with 4449's first operations on BN. Once it was calmly explained to the BN manager at their headquarters, that FRA diesel locomotives regulations did/do not apply to steam locomotives, plus those locomotives with operating "oscillating headlights", such as the original equipment Mars Light on 4449, the whole subject was dropped.

 

Maybe this is the reason that the Fort Wayne crew rebuilt the Mars light on the 765?

No, because as I recall the Mars Light on the 765 was a red warning light, and was activated by an emergency/penalty air brake application. 

I think your confusing the 261 with the 765.  The 765 had the clear light and the 261 had the red warning light.  

No, I didn't confuse the 765 with 261. However, I think the type of Mars Light on 765 is the type of design that can display a clear oscillating headlight, and then change to red for an emergency/penalty air brake application. Rich will have to clear up my memory. 

I'm wondering if indeed this is an issue at all. "I saw a photo" has become the internet version of when people used say, "I heard somewhere that..." when you have no backing at all for what you're talking about (or are making it up yourself).

I truly think that if there really were photos of 611 being fitted for ditch lights that they'd be all over the railfan internet by now.

Heck, RDG 2100 had her ditch lights... ditched the other day and those photos were everywhere within a couple of hours.

Google N&W 611 ditch lights or any close words to that end, and you won't find anything showing them being fitted or tested. I tried several different phrases for it.

I'm inclined to agree with Hot water, but if it is for real then such is life.  Also it better be the worlds thinnest light housing ever, because when the "beak" goes back on there isn't any room where they have it now unless they move it forward on the pilot in front of the cut lever.  But I'll believe it when I see it...besides what would throw a bunch of fans into a uproar quicker anyway.... 

Originally Posted by N&W Class J:

I'm inclined to agree with Hot water, but if it is for real then such is life.  Also it better be the worlds thinnest light housing ever, because when the "beak" goes back on there isn't any room where they have it now unless they move it forward on the pilot in front of the cut lever. 

 

There is more than enough room for them after the "nose cone" is installed.

 

But I'll believe it when I see it...besides what would throw a bunch of fans into a uproar quicker anyway.... 

 

I'm surprised that your sources didn't pick up on the ditch light housing mounted on the 4501 last year, while she was still in the TVRM shop in Chattanooga. 

 

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by N&W Class J:

I'm inclined to agree with Hot water, but if it is for real then such is life.  Also it better be the worlds thinnest light housing ever, because when the "beak" goes back on there isn't any room where they have it now unless they move it forward on the pilot in front of the cut lever. 

 

There is more than enough room for them after the "nose cone" is installed.

 

But I'll believe it when I see it...besides what would throw a bunch of fans into a uproar quicker anyway.... 

 

I'm surprised that your sources didn't pick up on the ditch light housing mounted on the 4501 last year, while she was still in the TVRM shop in Chattanooga. 

 

No, and I don't recall ever seeing them on the 4501 either...I must be going blind...  As for positioning those ditch lights behind the cut lever....it sure appears to be tight...but in front of it there is room to spare.  Take a look at that photo I linked to, am I just looking at it wrong because of the angle of the photo?  All the times I have been around the 611 I have never really looked at that area all that closely.  Either way it's still worth it to have the 611 back in steam.

 

 

 

Last edited by N&W Class J
Originally Posted by J 611:

According to a source close to the restoration crew she is going to have ditch lights. I'm not a fan of them on steam engines but oh well. 

I agree but it's a small price to pay so to speak.  It's going to be great having the 611 back on the rails.  The restoration crew has done an amazing job and are true professionals. 

Unfortunately 611 will have to have them as she was built after 12/31/1948, which any locomotive built before that is considered historic by the FRA and would be exempt from the regulation. I'd hope that the 611 folks have at least considered applying for a waiver, but as it's been said here already, not my engine...

Originally Posted by MH2198:

Unfortunately 611 will have to have them as she was built after 12/31/1948, which any locomotive built before that is considered historic by the FRA and would be exempt from the regulation. I'd hope that the 611 folks have at least considered applying for a waiver, but as it's been said here already, not my engine...

I don't think it matters when 611 was built, as the FRA regulations for diesel locomotives don't necessarily apply to steam locomotives, as they are covered under a different set of FRA regulations.

Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by MH2198:

Unfortunately 611 will have to have them as she was built after 12/31/1948, which any locomotive built before that is considered historic by the FRA and would be exempt from the regulation. I'd hope that the 611 folks have at least considered applying for a waiver, but as it's been said here already, not my engine...

I don't think it matters when 611 was built, as the FRA regulations for diesel locomotives don't necessarily apply to steam locomotives, as they are covered under a different set of FRA regulations.

Funny how those regs keep getitng misquoted, huh?

I think RDG 2100 having ditch lights for most of her latter career in WA state probably caused a lot of confusion in that regard...

I don't think any of the Chinese steam locomotives in the US have/had ditch lights, did they?

Originally Posted by N&W Class J:

As for the ditch lights, well there is only 2 answers...either yes or no.  Heck as long as she is back it doesn't really matter. 

Yeah, people can say that now, but if ditch lights show up, I can promise you it'll very much matter to people if they're on the engine when it runs on the main....

Question for those who might know.  On the trip home on May 30th is the departure time known?  The website says arrival in Roanoke between 2:30 and 4:00 PM but no info on departure.  I think I have looked at everything but if it is there I can't find it.

 

Also , is the 40 mph speed restriction for steam still in effect?

 

Thanks for any help.

 

George Lasley

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×