Skip to main content

Am curious as to how many ScaleTrax layouts are out there now. With the excellent exposure from Rich Battista's Black Diamond RR and the expansive Northwest Trunk Lines built by Dave and Ted Hikel these past several years, who else has one?  I remember reading of a fella from FL a year or so ago who bought a large quantity from MTH at York filling  the trunk of his vehicle. Anyone know what has he done?

 

Our previous layout was ScaleTrax and I was very pleased with it. The main appeal to me was the low profile and the thin center blade. When weathered and ballasted it looked terrific. The slightly too-large spacing of the ties became 'normal' in short time and never detracted from the overall  appearance. Also it performed well. Very easy to work with and the flex track is truly flexible. Cost was reasonable for a quality product.

 

The low profile translates into all of our equipment appearing more massive and realistic. I've hung onto most of it in hopes of moving again someday and building another. 

DSC05888

 

DSC05966

DSC07808

DSC07990

DSC08206

Attachments

Images (5)
  • DSC05888
  • DSC05966
  • DSC07808
  • DSC07990
  • DSC08206
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

If there was a greater variety of section curves available, I likely would use ScaleTrax.  Rich Battista's superb work with that line made me a believer.

 

As plans stand now, I plan to use GarGraves track and Ross switches for the re-make of my main layout (which now is fitted with FasTrack).

 

The tie spacing on ScaleTrax used to bother me, but once I saw what Rich did with it I became convinced that it's a darn fine looking--and low profile--track system.

Bob we had good service from ours. Occasionally we'd see some sparking as trains would travel through two of them but that was about it. All of ours were 072s and No. 6s. I was unaware of the easy fixes that Dave H published when I layed the track and never got around to pulling them up for the fix.

 

Next time I'm looking forward to trying to hand lay a couple of larger and/or curved switches using the Ross templates. The Hikels have done some amazing work in this area that I'd like to attempt too.

 

It would be great if Mike would get behind this track and expand the line with more sectional curves as mentioned by Allan above and especially some more switches. There was talk at one time from Steve B at Ross about them making a few switches compatible with ScaleTrax but nothing has come of it that I am aware of.

Using it on mine.  At first I was bothered with the sectional curve selection, but after setting some wide curves with the flex, I don't see myself using the sectional much.  The flex is so great to work with when following Rich Battista's instructions.
 
While a wider selection of switches would be nice, for the most part it isn't necessary.
Originally Posted by Bob Kazian:

Sam,

How do the ScaleTrax switches perform?

Bob, we used Scaletrax for our club's modular exhibition layout. The track looks great, the switches are problematic. We have had problems with derailing, shorting and with the switches breaking when heavy locos like scale Challengers etc are used. I could never recommend them.

I am tearing down my layout to move. Will build the new layout with Scaletrax instead of the planned upgrade to it.

 

Note, I found a way to use Existing Ross switches with Scaletrax to fill the limited offering of switches. (I'm using 2 Ross O-72 Wyes)

Put standard 5mm roadbed (Woodland Scenics)  under the ScaleTrax. Put 2mm cork sheet (Amazon). The rails line up sweet. I also found that Ross rails are shaped the same as ScaleTrax, but are just a bit taller. The Ross Ties are much larger, but wood ties as small as Scaletrax ties would split every time you stuck a track spike in them.

I liked the look and chose it for a layout I was building, then used it on the Micro Layout contest. I liked its insulated properties and how it worked with scale-wheeled equipment (in 2-rail mode, BTW), but admittedly the speed was low because of the minimal trackage. My plan is to only use #4 and #6 "straight-leg" turnouts when I build a larger layout. The curve radius here is 48" (O-96) and is all done with flex track and one #4 turnout.

2013-03-31 12.29.18

 

 

 

2013-04-01 19.03.15

Attachments

Images (2)
  • 2013-03-31 12.29.18
  • 2013-04-01 19.03.15

I looked at all the track systems available, and don't like any,  Scaletrax has the looks..but I hear unkind words about the switches.  When I build a structure that has

a siding, that siding is Scaletrax.  Other systems are too "vertical", too clunky, that

have to be buried in ballast to hide extraneous height.  I am reluctant to use Scaletrax

due to its incompatibility, and complicated connectibility.  I am waiting for another

brand with that low, realistic, profile.

When you get down to it, ScaleTrax has too wide of tie spacing and problematic switches.

And in reality not very many options in turnouts to be had.  So does the the thin third rail and low profile make up for those concessions?

AtlasO is still one of the top better looking 3 rail track systems, with a lot more to offer.

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×