Mark-I would seriously consider 072 for your engine. I put it on my 11x11 layout OK.
Mark, bigger curves are nicer and takes the problems out of derailments. You stated MTH said it should run on 0-54. I know there have been discussions on radiuses before. So what is the manufacturer of the track you are using. Maybe it runs on MTH track. Larger curves use real state. Were you able to try running it on someone else's layout with 0-54 curves. Also are both lead and trailing trucks unrestricted with no binding on the curves......Paul
I thin he runs FT.
You might want to look to see if it's wheels are over gauge Mark.
That and and guide slots needing some filing has helped me cheat the limits on a few items.
I sanded wheels till shiny and added a few more ounces of fishing lead to my Marx E7. The tarnish Marx wheels seem to develope so quickly has very poor traction. This engine varies from six cars no issues, to slipping with only 3 in about a month. I'm thinking about carving a slot for a traction tires now, as the motors strength doesn't seem to be any concern at all.
Gentlemen,
Thank you very much for your valued replies!
Jim, Yes I have seen before folks advising to use 072 on a layout if you can fit it in your space, and it will fit in 11 x 11. In fact after I had commented on another topic I would be planning a layout with at least one loop wide enough for this locomotive in May, Matt Jackson (AGHRMatt) emailed me a couple quick and dirty twice around plans in that space at 088 and 096. Thank you for the offer on trying it on yours. I'll let you know,
Paul, Now that I think of it, MTH cites 052 for minimum curve not 054. Yes, you are right that they can say that about their track system, but that doesn't necessarily mean it will work out on another manufacturer's track. Now that you mention it, I do recall seeing folks comment about that before. Why don't I remember things?? Thanks for the comment on the leading and trailing trucks. Yes, I did look them over, and they don't seem to be binding. I can slide them back and forth. That is a very good point to look at closer.
Adriatic, Yes I have FastTrack on the temporary 4 x 8 table top. I have an 048 loop and an 036 loop there. I realized I wouldn't be able to run the J 611 on that layout, I only set it on the straight away, powered it up, and ran it back and forth on the straight to see that things were working as soon as I received it. I don't do so well on the floor anymore. My bad knee pops and my bad ankle gives me grief on the Carpet Central, so I only put the trains there as a last resort.
I used Ross 054 and 064 for my tests yesterday. I have one loop of GarGraves and one loop of tubular on the Ceiling Central RR. I plan on using GarGraves and Ross on the permanent 11 x 11 layout, with some tubular in a switching yard with operating accessories. Of course I would be running the J in that area, so I can use any old tubular I have in my track box. You do have a good point that it is possible the wheels could be out of gauge. I bought this locomotive from a young fellow I know on a FaceBook group, who put it up for sale after realizing this was more engine than he had room to run. It doesn't have much time on it, so it could be out of gauge. I will check into that.
Thank you again for all the responses. I don't know when I will bet back to this. Yesterday was rainy I took advantage to do these tests. Besides outdoor work, be have a wedding coming up soon. I will keep you posted when I do get back to it.