Skip to main content

Did anyone order the Lionel Southern Legacy Hi-Nose GP30 Diesel?  I would assume someone did on this thread.  I have heard they have shipped and I was curious how it turned out.  If you purchase one and received it, please post some pictures, but if you can please post a video so we can hear it and see it in action!! 

Thanks

Ken

 

 

Originally Posted by lionel89:

Hello SRR fans.  I have a question regarding cabooses.  What caboose would y'all recommend to complement by Lionel Southern mountain locomotive?  I am trying to stay with K-Line or Lionel.  Thanks.  Tyler. 

Tyler

 

Here are a few Southern Cabooses from Lionel and K-line that I know of…

-Lionel 6-17601 Southern Woodside Caboose

-Lionel 6-17663 Southern Bay Window Caboose from 2004

-K-612-2012 Southern Bay Window Caboose – Red (Also K-line made one in Black

-6-22282 Lionel by K-line Southern Bay Window Caboose (Same Tooling as the K-Line Caboose Above)

 

I own Lionel 6-17663 and K-612-2012 Bay Window Cabooses.  The quality of K-Line Bay Window Caboose lacks.  I used the smoke unit and it melted the roof and the windows have fallen out.  If I were to choose, I may consider the Lionel Woodside Caboose from Lionel.  There are many of these available.  Also, there are pictures of most these cabooses in this thread. 

Originally Posted by lionel89:

Hello SRR fans.  I have a question regarding cabooses.  What caboose would y'all recommend to complement by Lionel Southern mountain locomotive?  I am trying to stay with K-Line or Lionel.  Thanks.  Tyler. 

Tyler, to the best of my knowledge Southern's mountain were used to pull passenger trains up the mountain.  But probably some time or other may have pulled freight.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by kjstrains:
Tyler

 

Here are a few Southern Cabooses from Lionel and K-line that I know of…

-Lionel 6-17601 Southern Woodside Caboose

-Lionel 6-17663 Southern Bay Window Caboose from 2004

-K-612-2012 Southern Bay Window Caboose – Red (Also K-line made one in Black

-6-22282 Lionel by K-line Southern Bay Window Caboose (Same Tooling as the K-Line Caboose Above)

 

I own Lionel 6-17663 and K-612-2012 Bay Window Cabooses.  The quality of K-Line Bay Window Caboose lacks.  I used the smoke unit and it melted the roof and the windows have fallen out.  If I were to choose, I may consider the Lionel Woodside Caboose from Lionel.  There are many of these available.  Also, there are pictures of most these cabooses in this thread. 

 

Thank you, kjstrains.  I did not realize a modern scale caboose from that era was scarce/non-existent.  I am going to look into a Lionel 6-17601 or 6-17663. 

 

Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Tyler, to the best of my knowledge Southern's mountain were used to pull passenger trains up the mountain.  But probably some time or other may have pulled freight.

 

Ron

 

You are correct, Ron.  Mine pulls the Lionel Carolina Special passenger set.  I am assuming the one Lionel modeled theirs after pulled the Carolina Special and other Southern passenger trains over Saluda.   

As steel Heavyweight cars began replacing wood on mainlines prior to WWI the Southern Ts 4-8-2 Mountain types replaced the light passenger Pacifics on the eastern Lines from Atlantia to Washington [both ways out of Spencer] and on the CNO&TP central lines both directions out of Chattanooga until the Ps-4s were built.

After arrival of Ps-4s the Ts and Ts-1s were shifted to Bristol-Memphis, Birmingham-Atlanta and other "hill climbs". All principal passenger trains out of Asheville were assigned 4-8-2s [home of#1491] including south over Saluda to Spartanburg and east through the Black Mountain "Loops" to Salisbury and Greensboro.

 

When passenger diesels became prevalent in the very early '50s via upgraded E6s, new E-7s as well as some continued use of F-3s equipped with steam generators; passenger steam power was scrapped or occasionally assigned to local freights. The engine "morgues" show a lot of Mountain type being scraped during 1950,51,52].

I recall snapshots of Ps-4s, including the streamlined "Tennessean", pulling local freight Spencer to Monroe, for example, but never saw evidence of a Mountain type heading freight. However it very likely occurred someplace on the Southern Ry.

 

Photo[painting] below of the Carolina Special [Ts-1] and Crescent[Ps-4] at Salisbury.

 

 

IMG_1809

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_1809
Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

After the big disappointment from Lionel regarding canceling the 18in Southern aluminum passenger cars, I had the privilege of buying something unusual today.  A dealer in NC had 6 special Southern passenger sets made and shipped directly from K Line.  I have never seen the other 5 (some of you all may own the others).  Now, I do realize these cars started out as a Santa-Fe set.  And, I thought the vista dome was out of place, but the Southern RR had a dome coach, 1613, which sometimes made the trip between Atlanta and New Orleans.

 

IMG_5889

IMG_5890

IMG_5891

IMG_5892

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_5889
  • IMG_5890
  • IMG_5891
  • IMG_5892
Last edited by lionel89
Originally Posted by Dewey Trogdon:

Impressive and awesome hopper assembly Neal. 

I hope Roger Whitsett my "stinking" diesel combatant sees it.

Hey Dewey, Yes I've seen the Lionel Southern GP30! If MTH produces one, I'll purchase it. I'm currently waiting on my LAST (hopefully!!) steam engine, N&W Class A 1218. After I purchase that engine, it may be my last....????. I'm STILL a "stinkin' diesel lover" at heart!!!...........lol

Originally Posted by lionel89:

After the big disappointment from Lionel regarding canceling the 18in Southern aluminum passenger cars, I had the privilege of buying something unusual today.  A dealer in NC had 6 special Southern passenger sets made and shipped directly from K Line.  I have never seen the other 5 (some of you all may own the others).  Now, I do realize these cars started out as a Santa-Fe set.  And, I thought the vista dome was out of place, but the Southern RR had a dome coach, 1613, which sometimes made the trip between Atlanta and New Orleans.

 

 

 

 

Tyler,

Very nice set of passenger cars!  From what I you said, it sounds like you got the last set?  I was also very disappointed that Lionel canceled the 18 inch Southern Aluminum passenger cars. Congratulations on a great find!  Thanks for sharing the photos.  Ken

 

Beautiful set Tyler and Dewey.

 

Prototype question:  did the streamline cars at some point carry the SR circular herald at one or both ends?  I have a strong recollection of seeing prototype photos with the herald on these streamliners, but it's so long ago I could very easily be mistaken.

Originally Posted by Pingman:

Beautiful set Tyler and Dewey.

 

Prototype question:  did the streamline cars at some point carry the SR circular herald at one or both ends?  I have a strong recollection of seeing prototype photos with the herald on these streamliners, but it's so long ago I could very easily be mistaken.

 

Yes, you are correct, and I do wish these had the decals.  Honestly, I have seen them both with and without. 

Thanks for the info, Tyler.

 

Many years ago I had "SOUTHERN" name plates made with the intention of making a Crescent passenger consist, and also purchased the SR heralds for them.  I know where the name plates are and will use them in the future when current projects are completed.  The decals, however, are MIA.

Originally Posted by lionel89:
Originally Posted by Pingman:

Beautiful set Tyler and Dewey.

 

Prototype question:  did the streamline cars at some point carry the SR circular herald at one or both ends?  I have a strong recollection of seeing prototype photos with the herald on these streamliners, but it's so long ago I could very easily be mistaken.

 

Yes, you are correct, and I do wish these had the decals.  Honestly, I have seen them both with and without. 

Tyler:

 

Microscale makes decals for O gauge Southern engines that include the heralds.  I don't know if the the heralds might be too large.  They also make HO scale decals for Southern and the heralds on those sheets might be the right size.

 

Neal Jeter

Originally Posted by ROGERW:
Originally Posted by Dewey Trogdon:

Impressive and awesome hopper assembly Neal. 

I hope Roger Whitsett my "stinking" diesel combatant sees it.

Hey Dewey, Yes I've seen the Lionel Southern GP30! If MTH produces one, I'll purchase it. I'm currently waiting on my LAST (hopefully!!) steam engine, N&W Class A 1218. After I purchase that engine, it may be my last....????. I'm STILL a "stinkin' diesel lover" at heart!!!...........lol

Hey Roger,

 

I picked up my GP30 last Saturday from the Choo-Choo.  Tested about an hour AOK so purchased.  Also tested the N&W 522.  But the couplers were firing backwards, so James has to fix before pickup.

 

A pix with one of Malcolm's great cabooses.

 

 

Roger if you want a 2601 I would not hold my breath for MTH to make them.  For years I traded emails with one of MTH's VP's after each new catalog release.  And going back to at least Oct. 2009 suggesting the hi-nose GP30.  When Mike was here for the HS Heritage event I discussed it  saying that the museum has 2601 and that the N&W 522 was also in the yard.  He said he would take some pictures.  When he was at the Choo-Choo others brought it to his attention.  Bur NO joy!

 

Now not long after Mike Reagan moved down here he visited the Choo-Choo.  Where and when we discussed the hi-nose GP30 with him.  They cataloged them last Fall and now we have them.

 

 

Ron

Originally Posted by Pingman:

Thanks for the info, Tyler.

 

Many years ago I had "SOUTHERN" name plates made with the intention of making a Crescent passenger consist, and also purchased the SR heralds for them.  I know where the name plates are and will use them in the future when current projects are completed.  The decals, however, are MIA.

The Southern heralds were placed on the cars to coincide with the locomotive nose heralds starting in 1971. They were used until 1979 on the Crescent cars, and in excursion service until NS mandated all tuscan cars. So use of the heralds (and black roofs to an extent) would be relegated to a short timeframe of operation. During the heyday of The Southerner and Crescent, Southern passenger cars had silver sides and roofs, and the cars were usually individually named. The K-Line set lionel89 purchased would represent the earlier operating years since the roofs are silver. 

I copied the following from an article about the Southern Crescent:

Southern Railway announced in 1929 that its first "train of luxury" was to begin life anew with brand-new equipment. Along with new Pullmans, cars built especially for the "Crescent Limited" four years earlier were completely refinished. What was "all new" was the distinctive exterior finish. Two shades of green adorned the luxury cars, each one lettered "Crescent Limited" in gold leaf along the upper panels. Pullman cars were named for distinguished sons of the seven states of the South through which the train ran.

My question is: What were/are these Two shades of green?

 

thank you - rdea

New to the forum and really enjoyed reading this thread.  Still have some to go,  but I've enjoyed the learning experience so far. 

My grandfather started with Southern in the 20s. Spent much of the 30s as a Fireman on the runs between Chattanooga and Kentucky.  Quit Southern to work for a bridge construction company.   It was more money and safer,  if you can believe that.  He went back to Southern in the early 60s to try to qualify for full retirement.  Eventually ended up running a switcher in Chattanooga for several years.  His last job was running the line he started at between Chattanooga and Kentucky.  Retired sometime in the 70s.

That's pretty much all I have pieced together on his days with Southern, since he died when I was young and his second wife ended up with all of the documentation from his career.

There is a few more family story about being sent home with pay for running the switcher into a work shed by accident.  Plus hitting a deaf/blind man walking on the tracks. Happened a month before he retired. He couldn't help it but always hated that.
In looking more at the new Southern GP-9, I discovered an interesting discrepancy. The real locos originally had 800 gallon fuel tanks. These were considered "branch line" units. Originally 8214-8215, they were renumbered 6256-6257 in early 1970. Since Lionel models have a 1300 gallon tank, this would be something you would have to accept on the model.

The MTH 302-303 GP-9s from a few years ago have a correct sized tank.

Just something to consider.
Originally Posted by Larry Neal:

Lionel is also coming out with two tuxedo Southern GP-9s, 6256 & 6257. They will be Legacy control with improved Conventional control. Just type Southern in Lionel's search box. Lionel SKU 82794 for 6256 and 82795 for 6257.

682794-1

 

Originally Posted by Larry Neal:
In looking more at the new Southern GP-9, I discovered an interesting discrepancy. The real locos originally had 800 gallon fuel tanks. These were considered "branch line" units. Originally 8214-8215, they were renumbered 6256-6257 in early 1970. Since Lionel models have a 1300 gallon tank, this would be something you would have to accept on the model.

The MTH 302-303 GP-9s from a few years ago have a correct sized tank.

Just something to consider.

 

I was originally on the fence about ordering a Southern GP-30 from the last catalog.  While the GP-9s look great, today I chose to order a SRR GP-30 2601 (not the one pictured below) from Charles Ro, since it is actually here and operates in North Carolina. 

 

682140-1

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 682140-1
Last edited by lionel89

Lionel is listening about the 630.  Mike R from Lionel posted this today on another thread:   https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/t...77#44088307234415677

 

The tender looks better, but for me I would rather see it done with new tooling.  Lionel wants to hear from us as Mike says below about creating new tooling for the 630.  What do you guys think?

 

From Mike R...

Wanted to send an update to all our fans on some of the new projects in the 2015 C2 Catalog. Let’s start with the Consolidations. Many of you have called and emailed (and posted here!) about the tender on Southern 630 in particular. We know this Consolidation is not an entirely accurate model for the 630 or many of the other roadnames included. However, if giving it a tender closer to the prototype will help – then the tender you will have!  We will be substituting the tender used on our USRA Mikados for the PRR E6 tender on these locomotives. Because this tender is at least a little closer in appearance for all of the locomotives, except those using Vanderbilts, we will make the change on the Milwaukee Road, Nickel Plate and Western Maryland versions as well.

 

We know this still does not get us off the hook for creating a completely accurate version of the 630, 734 or other Consolidations. Such a project will require a substantial amount of new tooling. So if you really want it – let us know!  We’re listening!

 

Look for some more updates here later today. Updates will be sent to your dealers early next week as well. Please contact them (and Lionel Customer Service) after Wednesday next week (9/23/15) if you have any questions.

 

6-82875_NEW2_TNDR_Southern_Consolidation_FLT

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 6-82875_NEW2_TNDR_Southern_Consolidation_FLT
Last edited by kjstrains

Ken and Thomas, do you think Lionel or any of the other O-Gauge makers will/would expend $150K to $225K for the required tooling for one eng?????????????

 

So are you willing to pay $200 to $500 more?  Might as well look at brass.

 

I know some have expressed their thoughts that tooling is not that expensive since made in China.  And you are correct but only to the fact that "tooling" is actual a global product.  So the value is a global value not just what happens or could happen in China.  Tooling is part of the global economy.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by Dewey Trogdon:

Placing the bell in the proper location requires no new tooling.

Maybe and again maybe not.  If the existing tooling leaves a hole for the bell mounting stem then that tooling would have to be modified say for no stem mounting hole at all.  Then all product would require the hole to be drilled.  So now they would have to tooling for multiple drilling fixtures and add manual processing steps.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by Mikado 4501:
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:

Ken and Thomas, do you think Lionel or any of the other O-Gauge makers will/would expend $150K to $225K for the required tooling for one eng?????????????

 

Since Mike Reagan's saying that they would do it if enough people say right now, I would say yes to that Ron.

The KEY word is "enough."  Ask Mike what the enough number would be.

 

In fact it with Mike that I had a extensive discussion on tooling cost during one of his many visits to the local toy train shop here.

 

The reason I used the word "maybe" above is because maybe the mounting hole is not in the casting dies.  As such then the hole is made separately.  So then as such a small number could then be drilled special.  It ALL depends on cost.

 

Ron

Yep, count me out on that 630 model. I don't do 3-rail at all but if someone made a good, accurate model of it, I might just buy one as it's the locomotive I got my first cab ride on when I was a kid, and my parents saw running in their hometown (Elizabethton, TN on the ET&WNC as their loco # 207) countless times in the 50s and 60s.
 
 
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:

Ken and Thomas, do you think Lionel or any of the other O-Gauge makers will/would expend $150K to $225K for the required tooling for one eng?????????????

Good question. I'll ask one in reply: do you think I or [m]any of the other O-Gauge modelers will/would expend $[a few hundred] for a locomotive model that has very little bearing on the actual prototype?????????????????????????????????????????????

  • Tooling is expensive?
  • Dog's pregnant?
  • Wife's got fleas?

Not my problem. Not one of them.

If a company wants to make a 'representational' model that has very little bearing on the real article, fine. But anyone arguing that tooling is expensive will get the immediate question from me of, "why'd they even bother, then, if they knew they couldn't/wouldn't make an accurate model?"

Can't/won't make the tooling? Fine. Make a different model, then. Problem solved, right?

Originally Posted by Dewey Trogdon:

Placing the bell in the proper location requires no new tooling.

Dewey, I just puled out my copy of "Steam's Camelot" to see a good picture of 630.  It is not simply the bell location, it is the steam dome location.  I know on some of the HO steam kits I have been involved with the dome attached separately.  But I am more then reasonably sure these are cast in based on the dies.  That is the major piece of tooling.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by p51:
Yep, count me out on that 630 model. I don't do 3-rail at all but if someone made a good, accurate model of it, I might just buy one as it's the locomotive I got my first cab ride on when I was a kid, and my parents saw running in their hometown (Elizabethton, TN on the ET&WNC as their loco # 207) countless times in the 50s and 60s.
 
 
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:

Ken and Thomas, do you think Lionel or any of the other O-Gauge makers will/would expend $150K to $225K for the required tooling for one eng?????????????

Good question. I'll ask one in reply: do you think I or [m]any of the other O-Gauge modelers will/would expend $[a few hundred] for a locomotive model that has very little bearing on the actual prototype?????????????????????????????????????????????

  • Tooling is expensive?
  • Dog's pregnant?
  • Wife's got fleas?

Not my problem. Not one of them.

If a company wants to make a 'representational' model that has very little bearing on the real article, fine. But anyone arguing that tooling is expensive will get the immediate question from me of, "why'd they even bother, then, if they knew they couldn't/wouldn't make an accurate model?"

Can't/won't make the tooling? Fine. Make a different model, then. Problem solved, right?

Eons ago one of my Calculus professors would say it is all FDR's fault!

 

 

Ron

Ron

Quite a few differences that would require new tooling and tender.

 

Schematic drawings show one SRR Consolidation's tender with 14 ton coal and 10K gallon water capacity. Inside tender dimensions 28'x10'-10". Dimension from center of stack to center of steam dome=14'-5".

Another shows a smaller tender dimension as 27'x10'-0" with capacity of 14K tons and 8K gallons. Center of stack dimension to center of steam dome=14'-0-1/4".

 

 

On both, the bell mounted in the "Blessing" position top front of smokebox--"Southern style".

 

                              .................from Southern Steam Power, Ranks & Lowe.

Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

Hey Dewey,

 

Looking at the catalog they are saying "All New." 

 

If that means new tooling then there is a way at INCREASED cost to accommodate more than one style Consplidation at least to some degree. 

 

It appears Lionel is basing their 2-8-0 on a Harriman standard Consolidation.  Lionel maybe ,again if new tooling, go the extra cost for modularized tooling.  Where the top section of the boiler can be changed out.  But I would expect a greater MSRP for these probably much smaller sales items.  

 

But also to gain at least some of the Southern 630 looks the smoke box front would have to be drilled for the bell mounting bracket and the headlight would have to be lowered on a bracket with a brow on the light.

 

These changes would make it more Southern albeit not completely.

 

 

The only way to get it completely Southern is with a lot of tooling.  And I doubt if there would be enough purchase interest to pay the price.

 

Ron

I like all three offerings and would like a set of E-8's.  I just wish they would offer a non-powered version of the A unit.   All my passenger equipment works quite well with one power unit.  This would also really cut down on the  cost of having an A-A configuration.

 

Nice to see nice Southern offering in MTH's catalogue.

 

Happy railroading,

Don

Both Mikados look lovely.

 

Then again, all of them do. The Premier Mikados are some of my top favorite engines by MTH. I'm glad to see them back with PS3.

 

Great idea by MTH to do both the familiar Crescent green version AND the current black version for those who have preferences.

 

Though their tenders look a bit too small to be accurate and the prices are pretty high, I gotta give MTH a thumbs up.

Last edited by Mikado 4501

As to the 4501 MTH tenders being too small,4501's original tender was smaller and the green MTH version reminds me of that.It was around 1973 that 4501 got her current larger tender that was from a scrapped Central of Georgia 2-10-2. Hopefully MTH will recognize this and do the silver smoke box version like she had with the smaller tender.. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lionelkid18/6091446685

Originally Posted by ROGERW:

PRRronbh, Maybe if we write MTH, they may make changes to the Southern E-8 that will make it current to the actual Southern E-8 that's at the NCTM in Spencer NC..............rogerw.

Roger, have sent an email to one of the VPs.  But the more the merrier and better chance they might listen.  At would be nice to have #6900 as a contemporary engine.  That is what would make me pull the tiger on a purchase.  We can add roof tanks ourselves.

 

Ron

 

 

 

Last edited by PRRronbh

To follow on Dave's conversation with MTH about rooftop air tanks, I spoke with the 3rd Rail representative on Thursday (sorry, I misplaced the index card where I wrote his name).  He said their Southern E-8 would have the air tanks.  Glad I ordered one to help that cause.  He thought they would arrive in late 2016.   Cheers - Bryan

Originally Posted by Johnny Winkler:

As to the 4501 MTH tenders being too small,4501's original tender was smaller and the green MTH version reminds me of that.It was around 1973 that 4501 got her current larger tender that was from a scrapped Central of Georgia 2-10-2. Hopefully MTH will recognize this and do the silver smoke box version like she had with the smaller tender.. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lionelkid18/6091446685

Considering Lionel used the silver smoke box when they did the model of 4501 back in 1992, I wouldn't be surprised if MTH did as well.

 

As far as their tenders go MTH-wise, they feel like an odd fusion of the original short tenders and the current elongated one. It's not too bad, but it would've been nice to get the current large ones. Kind of like it would've been nice that the NKP 587 one in the same catalog got the Berkshire tender like the current prototype.

 

I'm also curious if they give the 4501's scenic rail fan passenger announcements, not all too different from how they did with their rendition of Western Maryland #734.

 

Not to mention give them prototypical whistles!

Last edited by Mikado 4501
Hi Ben,,
 
Do you still have your Magellan Overland car?
 
 
Originally Posted by Ben Nance:
Originally Posted by kjstrains:
Ben
Very nice collection of Southern Steam Engines.  I like how you displayed HO versions of Southern Tennessean and PS4 in front of O'Gauge Models.  I thought about getting Weaver's Southern Tennessean for my own collection, but the prices I have seen on the bay recently have been way too high for me...$2500. 
Thanks for sharing your photos.
 
Ken
 
 

 

Thanks Ken! 

It's completely ridiculous what people on eBay try to get for the Weaver Tennessean these days. Just because once one got caught in a bidding war and went for $2000+, now everyone thinks it's overly rare. That engine should really only go for about $800. But it really is a beautiful engine and quite accurate. However I'd still like to find the two rail O scale version. 

 

 

SC Shagger, I contacted Lionel several months ago about the 18" Southern Passenger cars that are still on the shipping schedule.  They confirmed that they are not making them and being replaced by 21" Southern Passenger Cars.  They said it was a mistake on the shipping schedule.

Very nice photo of Southern Engines in front of your Christmas Tree!  I used to live in Columbia and had dinner at the station several times.  Thanks for sharing the photos!

Did anyone purchase Lionel Legacy Southern Heavy Mikado and have photos or video of it?  I believe it recently shipped to dealers. 

Mikado 4501 posted:

Tyler,

That FM looks terrific. Lovely paint and excellent detail.

 

Personally, I'm looking forward to how the new MTH Premier Southern Mikados turn out when they (reportedly) will be out next month.

I agree the FM looks very sharp!  Nice purchase, Tyler.

The MTH Southern Mikado should be interesting to see.  

Speaking about Mikados, has anyone seen or bought the New Lionel Legacy Heavy Southern Mikado?  I know it's not exactly prototypical but like to see some photos anyways.

Mikado 4501 posted:

Tyler,

That FM looks terrific. Lovely paint and excellent detail.

 

Personally, I'm looking forward to how the new MTH Premier Southern Mikados turn out when they (reportedly) will be out next month.

Me too.  Regarding the arrival time, I would not hold my breath.  I am also curious about Lionel's 630. 

kjstrains posted:
Mikado 4501 posted:

Tyler,

That FM looks terrific. Lovely paint and excellent detail.

 

Personally, I'm looking forward to how the new MTH Premier Southern Mikados turn out when they (reportedly) will be out next month.

I agree the FM looks very sharp!  Nice purchase, Tyler.

The MTH Southern Mikado should be interesting to see.  

Speaking about Mikados, has anyone seen or bought the New Lionel Legacy Heavy Southern Mikado?  I know it's not exactly prototypical but like to see some photos anyways.

Thank you, Kjstrains.  I have seen Lionel's 4866 in action, however, I did not purchase one.  It's a beautiful locomotive, but I reserved a 3rd Rail SRR E8 instead. 

The FM Train Master looks pretty good, but.  I am a bit surprised after the great job Lionel did with the Hi-Nose GP30's

that they missed a particular detail for the Souther FM Train Master.  The pilot decks were stepped down for the safety of the crews.

MTH did get this Southern detail correct.

Note different height in pilot deck of PRR at left vs. Southern at right.

 

Ron

IMG_1584IMG_2038   I  have two Southern Railway Ps-4  4-6-2 Weaver "Tennesseans" . I plan to eventually sell the one that has the T/A Studios upgrade to TMCC. The engine has the Limited Edition Certificate and has been run very little. I am certain the aged traction tires would probably last only briefly in running. I purchased this engine from "Purple Papa" at his store in Conway,S.C. near Myrtle Beach about 15 years ago. I paid $800 for the engine and about $190 for TMMC.

The engine is damaged via a partial crack in the rear of the cab roof in the bend where it turns up. An auto body friend placed epoxy in the crack and although the crack/epoxy is not obvious I had planned to repaint the roof [original flat black] but hand tremors have eliminated that. No cosmetic damage otherwise. The engine was dropped from knee high onto carpeted floor. [Eight years ago my son had it upside down in his lap oiling it and dropped it between his legs when his 3 year old raised up and cut her head on a glass table].

When ready to sell I will list on the OGR Buy/Sell Forum. Most folks probably consider T/A's upgrade obsolete although it functions perfectly from Cab 1. In addition there is likely a perceived damage discount from "elite" pricing levels mentioned on the Bay,etc.  In that regard pricing  won't be anywhere near $1,000. [but when listed on OGR 3 years ago at sub- $800 price I received zero response].

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_2038
Last edited by Dewey Trogdon
PRRronbh posted:

The FM Train Master looks pretty good, but.  I am a bit surprised after the great job Lionel did with the Hi-Nose GP30's

that they missed a particular detail for the Souther FM Train Master.  The pilot decks were stepped down for the safety of the crews.

MTH did get this Southern detail correct.

Note different height in pilot deck of PRR at left vs. Southern at right.

 

Ron

Yes, I agree.  Lionel outdid themselves in regards to the GP30's.  I originally purchased one SRR GP-30, but I loved it so much that I purchased the other road number.

Another thing that bothers me about Lionel's SRR FM, is the absence of the bell on the front of the loco. 

Well since "LIONLMAN" did not post images of the Heavy Mikado fireman's side I will.

And also a tighter shot of the smoke box,

As a Southern fan would like a good representation of a Ms-4 Heavy Mikado.  And as we all should know the three-rail makers most probably will NOT invest 150/200K for die cast tooling for at best a few hundred sales.

My personal philosophy is not to spend $$$$ on motive power that is NOT Very, Very, Very close to prototype.  And it is Very to Very, Very close for cabin/cabooses.   As stated before Lionel did hit it out of the park with the Southern & N&W high-nose GP30s.

But this Mikado falls short.  But it could have been a contender.

First off 4866 has the more numerous Elesco water heaters on the top front of the smoke box.  Although 4866 had a Alligator guide and the split walkways as Lionel's model.

Now if Lionel would have researched they would have found that 4829 used the worthington heater, had Alligator guide and split walkway much like their model.  Also from the so so picture of 4829 I found, it appears that the worthington heater is mounted just below the walkway between the pump and cab.  So even If a Worthington heater could add as an add on, it would not look too bad.  Also the apparent add on turbine on top of the smoke-box in front of the stack should not be there but should be just in front of the cab fireman's side.

And of course the the quintessential Southern steam engine look is the slight lower than center headlight.  Also on the Lionel model the classlights should be moved more outward.  Now presuming that the smokebox front is an separate piece it could have been tooled for a modest price.

Now I for one would have been willing to pony up $100 to $150 more to make this model Very, Very + close.

 So disappointing, sure would like a Ms-4!

Ron

Last edited by PRRronbh

Another issue with Lionel's 4866 is the dynamo mounted just behind the bell. This should be located just in front of the cab.

The biggest problem with models of Southern steam is what they did at Spencer and other shops during the 1940s. As part of their rebuilding and modernizing steam locomotives, many had the walkways changed beside the smoke box, allowing easier access for the shop crews to do their work. The SRHA has documented this well in past issues of TIES magazine. You could tell the shop that serviced the locomotive by the design of the new steps and handrails. This Lionel model, even if totally correct for a Worthington Feeder locomotive, would still not by prototypically correct for the mid 1940s - early 50s era. The same modification was done to the PS-4s as well. I attached an image of the 1401 as she looks now, and notice the "high ladders" on the front. Compare to any model of Lionel or MTH and see the difference. This would have been done at Spencer shops.

Now, with some decals, detail parts and paint this can be turned into a very close model of a Ms-4, but with an $1100 cost I am not sure how many modelers would take that extra route. 

I have several good images of Southern Ms-4 locomotives at home on my laptop that I can upload if anyone wants to see the differences between model and in-service appearance.85318502.XMPJe9Mi.DSCN0512640

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 85318502.XMPJe9Mi.DSCN0512640

A friend of mine had a periodical that a gentleman wrote about the old Weed Line that ran from Alexandria Va to Harrisonburg Va.  The man worked the Weed Line and in his own words talked about his experiences.   I forget how many years he worked but it was some very interesting reading about working for the Southern Railroad.  My friend has misplaced his copy and I was wondering if anybody might have information as to where another copy could be found. 

Well a few weeks ago I ran across these images of a NS GP59 taken at a NS event at the NCTM.  Posted one on the week photo thread.  Posting all four with a story.

In 2000 I accepted a position as Quality Manager at a manufacturing plant adjacent to the NCDOT double mainline tracks through.  In fact shared office area on second floor over the QA testing lab.  We had two large picture windows overlooking that mainline only about 40-yards away.   Due to build shape only had a few degrees of view.  Was very hard not to spend time looking out.  One day recall looking out as train went by to see an Abraham M1A1 on a flat.  I tried to discipline myself not to look like I was paying too much attention to trains going by.  And one day from the corner of my eye I a green and white (imitation aluminum) engine go by.  Did not get a good look.  Asked train friends and found it was this 4610.  The Southern rides again!

Ron

Last edited by PRRronbh
clinchfield bill posted:

A friend of mine had a periodical that a gentleman wrote about the old Weed Line that ran from Alexandria Va to Harrisonburg Va.  The man worked the Weed Line and in his own words talked about his experiences.   I forget how many years he worked but it was some very interesting reading about working for the Southern Railroad.  My friend has misplaced his copy and I was wondering if anybody might have information as to where another copy could be found. 

http://www.amazon.com/Southern...Hepler/dp/1883089638

 

Lionlman posted:
Williams custom painted U33C with high hood added



Williams custom painted SD-45 with high hood added



MTH custom painted GP-30 with high hood added



I have had the U33C and GP-30 converted to TMCC with Railsounds.

Neal Jeter

Just came across these. Great job! How hard was it to build the high hood? I want to do something similar to my Lionel SD40-2's.

I used a zona saw to remove the roof of the low hood.  I tried to use a Dremel cut off wheel but all it did was melt the plastic.  I built the high sides and nose with sheet styrene.  I then used super glue to attach the styrene to the roof and sides.  I then used auto body putty to fill in any gaps.  I then spray painted the entire engine flat black.  I used Microscale O scale Southern Railway decals.  After this I sprayed the entire engine with dullcote.  

Neal Jeter 

Roger,

Congrats on your new E8.  Did MTH update the trucks to the modern 3 axle arrangement with the blind axle in the middle instead of the inner most axle?  In other words, flange-blind-flange instead of B-F-F.  The older E8s I have are the latter and they derail constantly in switches.

Cheers,

Bryan 

RidgeRunner posted:

Roger,

Congrats on your new E8.  Did MTH update the trucks to the modern 3 axle arrangement with the blind axle in the middle instead of the inner most axle?  In other words, flange-blind-flange instead of B-F-F.  The older E8s I have are the latter and they derail constantly in switches.

Cheers,

Bryan 

Hi Bryan,

Although this arrangement is not prototypical, it is functional in that long frame diesels can negotiate O-31.

I do not recall hearing of this problem so am curious.  What brand (manufacturer) of switch(s) and track is involve?  What diameter curves/switch(s)?  Are the switches and connected track the same brand?  What (by MTH item number) is/are the engine(s) involved?

As said just curious since hace not seen this type of problem and have several MTH engines with this arrangement.

Ron

PRRronbh posted:
RidgeRunner posted:

Roger,

Congrats on your new E8.  Did MTH update the trucks to the modern 3 axle arrangement with the blind axle in the middle instead of the inner most axle?  In other words, flange-blind-flange instead of B-F-F.  The older E8s I have are the latter and they derail constantly in switches.

Cheers,

Bryan 

Hi Bryan,

Although this arrangement is not prototypical, it is functional in that long frame diesels can negotiate O-31.

I do not recall hearing of this problem so am curious.  What brand (manufacturer) of switch(s) and track is involve?  What diameter curves/switch(s)?  Are the switches and connected track the same brand?  What (by MTH item number) is/are the engine(s) involved?

As said just curious since hace not seen this type of problem and have several MTH engines with this arrangement.

Ron

Hi Ron,

Yep, I already recognize and agree as to the O-31 functionality.  To your question, O-72 MTH Realtrax and Lionel Fastback turnouts.

Previous detailed discussion is here where others reported the same issue I've had in ABA configuration.  It's nice MTH sells the A units singly now and without the tether.  It's sad to have to leave the old BA units in the box because they don't play nice together with the lead A. 

https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/t...63#36484918432457163

Bryan

That is a nice engine.

That new train inspired me to post something from my family history.  This is from my Mother's collection.  My Grandfather worked for Southern out of Chattanooga as a fireman. As they transitioned from steam to diesel,  this was the only training he got on the new technology.  An instruction manual for his new assignment,  the EMC FTA #6100.  One day I would like to get a model of that train. 

imageimage

Attachments

Images (2)
  • image
  • image
Last edited by jstraw124
 

Yep, I already recognize and agree as to the O-31 functionality.  To your question, O-72 MTH Realtrax and Lionel Fastback turnouts.

Previous detailed discussion is here where others reported the same issue I've had in ABA configuration.  It's nice MTH sells the A units singly now and without the tether.  It's sad to have to leave the old BA units in the box because they don't play nice together with the lead A. 

https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/t...63#36484918432457163

Bryan

Hi Bryan,

Just got to ask how did/do you mate the two dissimilar track types and get a smooth transition?  Especially since the FasTrack rail ends are NOT even?

Ron

PRRronbh posted:
 

Yep, I already recognize and agree as to the O-31 functionality.  To your question, O-72 MTH Realtrax and Lionel Fastback turnouts.

Previous detailed discussion is here where others reported the same issue I've had in ABA configuration.  It's nice MTH sells the A units singly now and without the tether.  It's sad to have to leave the old BA units in the box because they don't play nice together with the lead A. 

https://ogrforum.ogaugerr.com/t...63#36484918432457163

Bryan

Hi Bryan,

Just got to ask how did/do you mate the two dissimilar track types and get a smooth transition?  Especially since the FasTrack rail ends are NOT even?

Ron

Ron,

I don't mix track.  I have Realtrax (for now).  Friends have Fastrack.  The problem occurs on both O-72 switch types.  Thanks for the discussion but I don't want to hijack the thread away from Roger's posting of his SR E8 acquisition.  He was kind enough to answer my question.

All the best,

Bryan

Last edited by RidgeRunner

Hello All, These photos are for clarification on the MTH-Premier Southern E-8 Diesel engine. The engines from left to right are:

MTH-Premier Southern E-8 (2002) Left

MTH-Premier Southern E-8 (2010) Middle

MTH-Premier Southern E-8 (2016) Right

There is also 2 pictures showing Southern E-8 Engine# 6900 with ditch lights....................RogerW.IMG_0404IMG_0405IMG_0407IMG_0409

Attachments

Images (4)
  • IMG_0404
  • IMG_0405
  • IMG_0407
  • IMG_0409

What would you think of a Vanderbilt tender behind the Southern 4-8-2 #1491:

DSCN0671_492

Just kidding, don't shoot!!!

I'm in the process of converting this Lionel engine to a Seaboard Mountain with Vandy tender.  Still have a loooong way to go and then I have to rework some of the boiler accoutrements (sand dome, part of the running board, bell)!!!

I think it looks great, did Southern ever have any Vanderbilt tenders???

Attachments

Images (1)
  • DSCN0671_492

Lift Bridge Crossing

In the TMCC section of the forum, I'm upgrading my 4501 Mikado made by Lionel 24 years ago. It's not done yet, but just enough that I could get this shot outdoors.

I guess there are some perks of not having a permanent layout. And it's cool what you can do with a little PhotoShopping.

BTW, look closely, and you'll see that I've painted the cowcatcher rim and the edges of the pilot to make the engine look much more like the prototype was when it was painted green.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Lift Bridge Crossing

Bob

The Erie engines with the Vanderbilt tenders that Neal noted were assigned to the Alabama Great Southern for oil train duty when German submarines literally shut down the Gulf and East Coast wartime tanker shipping from the Gulf ports to Northeastern ports. TIES had an article noting the difficulty Southern engineers had initially in getting use to the surges in long tanker train consists. Eventually experience and better tanker baffles eased the problem and the flow of fuel for factories and folks continued for the wartime economy, earning Southern an "E" for efficiency award from the U.S. government.

Trivia Dept

Well we all knew that it wasn't going to be a spot on model of the 630, it does sound good and it is a fine looking model. I'm just wondering though if it isn't a closer model to the Southern 542 over at Spencer, NC? (sorry I do not know the southern class offhand) 

I'm thinking Lionel could have made this one in lieu of the 630 and gotten pretty close to the prototype. But as long as the owners enjoy it that's all that matters. 

imageimageimage

Attachments

Images (3)
  • image
  • image
  • image

I think Lionel knocked it out of the park with the whistle this time around. Some of the recent engines I've seen (Empire State Hudsons, Heavy Mikados, FEF-3's) I felt on the fence about.

This one is great. It sounds fresh and authentic. I hope that if Lionel/ERR update their RailSounds upgrade packages, they put that whistle in for Medium steam.

From the thread about the Atlas O catalog for July to December according to Mr. Muffin's Trains we are going to see Southern Railway SD40s.  It is an August announcement.  I don't know about a delivery date.  He said the product numbers weren't correct but this gives us an idea. 

AO-30125012 SD40 Locomotive Southern (NS Heritage) 3-Rail

AO-30125013 SD40 Locomotive Southern 3-Rail

AO-30125014 SD40 Locomotive Southern 3-Rail

AO-30125020 SD40 Locomotive Southern 3-Rail

Neal Jeter

Atlantic & Yadkin/Southern 2-8-0 #542 is a cosmetic restoration and sometime movie star that was rescued from a concrete pad at a Winston-Salem park. It is the sole surviving engine of the A&Y which was shut down 12/31/49 when its bonds were liberated by Southern. The Secretary of State retired the A&Y's Charter within a few weeks.

The Museum moves it around with a tiny Yard Goat.

Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

542 sure is shiny and clean not at all like the N&W 4-8-0 1134 here in Portsmouth sitting out in the elements.  here's a shot when first put in place (it's got various droppings on it now):

N&W 4-8-0 1134a

I've been trying to understand why I don't have any Southern engines, as they came into Portsmouth.  Matter of fact, I don't have but 1 piece of Southern rolling stock

Anyone know if what came into Portsmouth was mainly passenger or was freight an important part too?

 

Attachments

Images (1)
  • N&W 4-8-0 1134a
Last edited by Bob Delbridge
DaveJfr0 posted:

Ah, these units are painted for post-1978 paint schemes, not as-built (these were built in 1971/72). (well the 3170, for year 2015 as-built is correct)  

Counts me out unfortunately, looks like I will have to buy used and repaint my own to get the original metallic gold scheme.  

 

Here is the artwork from Atlas for those who have yet to see it.

The write up for these says ditch lights as well, which would be right for the 3170 but wrong for the others in this scheme. I sent in an email, but haven't heard back yet. If I hear back from Atlas, I post on this page.

Might have to think about a 3170, though.

It's OK Tiffany - Santa Fe and The SOUTHERN are my two favorite RRs as well. They look great together as this shelf display above my TV illustrates. The Alco PA is a USA Trains model while the Green RS3 is by Aristocraft. Below the RS3 is a MTH RS1 in the Tuxedo scheme. You can see a SR Work Truck just to the left of the RS3 on the top shelf while the painting is from the 1956 Lionel catalog depicting "The Mighty Southern" freight set!IMG_2669 too.

Attachments

Images (1)
  • IMG_2669
Last edited by c.sam
c.sam posted:

It's OK Tiffany - Santa Fe and The SOUTHERN are my two favorite RRs as well. They look great together as this shelf display above my TV illustrates. The Alco PA is a USA Trains model while the Green RS3 is by Aristocraft. Below the RS3 is a MTH RS1 in the Tuxedo scheme. You can see a SR Work Truck just to the left of the RS3 on the top shelf while the painting is from the 1956 Lionel catalog depicting "The Mighty Southern" freight set!IMG_2669 too.

hello c.sam

I have not thought of that way "Santa Fe from the West meets The Southern from the East" , your display looks coooooool ! I wondered what the S.F.5011 would look like in Southern colors (green body, red roof top of the cab, gold pin stripes) ?

Tiffany

Hello guys and gals.........

I might have been bitten by a Southern green bug with no possible cure !!!!!!!!  I have a question to ask about gold pin stripes and cabooses.  I been looking at "Railpictures.net  for Southern cabooses and diesel locomotives. The question is # 1 were there any green painted bay window cabooses as most of the photos shows cabooses painted red all over, yellow bay windows and steps and white letterings, numbers but no green ones.   I kind of liked the green ones as they look more fancy !! Question # 2 Most of the diesels have yellow pin stripes and letterings, numbers but very few with gold color paint used for that does this mean yellow looks better than gold and paint more tougher to stand the weather ?   I wished for the railking bay window caboose to go with my railking NW-2 switcher # 30-2157-1 I bought almost 2 weeks ago.  This switcher is in green color, white band and gold pin stripes,letterings , numbers (really an beautiful small engine).  I really loved that switcher!!!

 

Tiffany

Last edited by Tiffany
Tiffany posted:

Hello guys and gals.........

I might have been bitten by a Southern green bug with no possible cure !!!!!!!!  I have a question to ask about gold pin stripes and cabooses.  I been looking at "Railpictures.net  for Southern cabooses and diesel locomotives. The question is # 1 were there any green painted bay window cabooses as most of the photos shows cabooses painted red all over, yellow bay windows and steps and white letterings, numbers but no green ones.   I kind of liked the green ones as they look more fancy !! Question # 2 Most of the diesels have yellow pin stripes and letterings, numbers but very few with gold color paint used for that does this mean yellow looks better than gold and paint more tougher to stand the weather ?   I wished for the railking bay window caboose to go with my railking NW-2 switcher # 30-2157-1 I bought almost 2 weeks ago.  This switcher is in green color, white band and gold pin stripes,letterings , numbers (really an beautiful small engine).  I really loved that switcher!!!

 

Tiffany

The Southern never had green cabooses of any kind. They were always red except for a time in the 1960s when fhey were a brown color. 

Those with yellow bay windows were assigned to local train service.

Locomotives were painted either black or green with variations of gold colored stripes separating the imitation aluminum stripe (not white). The stripes were not yellow, but may look that way in photographs.

Hope this helps -

 

Last edited by Larry Neal

The early gold striping was described as bronze gold.  Sometime in the 1970s Southern started using deluxe gold which appears to be yellow.  The lettering and numbers also were changed from bronze gold to deluxe gold.  Southern didn't have any green cabooses.  There is one painted green and numbered "1396".  I have a slide of it that I purchased on eBay.  The date on the slide is 12-28-92.  I believe it was used as a visitors center or some other type of civic building but I don't know which town it was in.  Lionel made a green Southern caboose in the 70s or 80s numbered 9273.  More recent they made 27681 a green caboose.

Neal Jeter

Last edited by Lionlman
Larry Neal posted:
Tiffany posted:

Hello guys and gals.........

I might have been bitten by a Southern green bug with no possible cure !!!!!!!!  I have a question to ask about gold pin stripes and cabooses.  I been looking at "Railpictures.net  for Southern cabooses and diesel locomotives. The question is # 1 were there any green painted bay window cabooses as most of the photos shows cabooses painted red all over, yellow bay windows and steps and white letterings, numbers but no green ones.   I kind of liked the green ones as they look more fancy !! Question # 2 Most of the diesels have yellow pin stripes and letterings, numbers but very few with gold color paint used for that does this mean yellow looks better than gold and paint more tougher to stand the weather ?   I wished for the railking bay window caboose to go with my railking NW-2 switcher # 30-2157-1 I bought almost 2 weeks ago.  This switcher is in green color, white band and gold pin stripes,letterings , numbers (really an beautiful small engine).  I really loved that switcher!!!

 

Tiffany

The Southern never had green cabooses of any kind. They were always red except for a time in the 1960s when fhey were a brown color. 

Those with yellow bay windows were assigned to local train service.

Locomotives were painted either black or green with variations of gold colored stripes separating the imitation aluminum stripe (not white). The stripes were not yellow, but may look that way in photographs.

Hope this helps -

 

Hello Larry Neal.........

Thank you, I learned something new tonight

Tiffany

Lionlman posted:

The early gold striping was described as bronze gold.  Sometime in the 1970s Southern started using deluxe gold which appears to be yellow.  The lettering and numbers also were changed from bronze gold to deluxe gold.  Southern didn't have any green cabooses.  There is one painted green and numbered "1396".  I have a slide of it that I purchased on eBay.  The date on the slide is 12-28-92.  I believe it was used as a visitors center or some other type of civic building but I don't know which town it was in.  Lionel made a green Southern caboose in the 70s or 80s numbered 9273.  More recent they made 27681 a green caboose.

Neal Jeter

Hello Neal Jeter

Thank you, I learned something new tonight

Tiffany

Years back when I was doing local shows I was in Charlotte when a guy asked me if I knew of any Green & "White" Southern cabooses.  I told him that some of the O-gauge makers made them, but they were NOT prototypical but Black & "white" was.  He told he did not care about prototypical he had green & white train that he want a caboose to match!

This was somewhat eye opening.  When MTH brought out a 120 ton green & white crane I jumped on it thinking MTH would never get the color correct. A few years later they did.  So then brought their black & "white" version thinking some day to sell the green & white one.

Will recently displayed at a couple local shows with this piece.  NOT a look.  Local toy train store owner is also surprised.

My post here on the "Sell" board.?

Ron

Lionlman posted:

Sometime in the 1970s Southern started using deluxe gold which appears to be yellow.  

Neal Jeter

It was common to see a paint called Dulux gold, not deluxe gold. Dulux is pronounced "doolux. Dulux gold, made by DuPont, was a fairly common paint used by railroads for lettering, among other things. I've seen a reference to a Soo Line paint called Deluxe gold, but that may be a misspelling, I'm not sure.

Dulux gold is not really yellow, but rather this shade, more or less.  One source shows the alleged Soo Line deluxe gold as shown at the bottom, but, as stated, that might actually be Dulux gold as well. Internet color reproductions are somewhat variable. Maybe Southern had something else, but I'm not aware of it.

Image result for railroad dulux gold paint

Soo Line Deluxe Gold

kjstrains posted:

The MTH 4501 Southern Mikado has shipped to dealers.  I am interested in seeing what green and black versions look like.  I would like to hear the whistle in comparison to the Lionel Legacy model.  Is anyone getting one and willing to share some photos and video?

Ken, to answer, even though I would love to hear the sounds on these new engines, I passed on getting them. They look nice, but not a grand plus nice. I personally found more satisfaction taking the old Lionel '92 model that DOES have the 95% correct shape and form and upgrading it to more up to date everything for about 2/3's of the new models' cost (PS3 or even Legacy).

The funny thing is very few people take photos or videos of any MTH Mikados. YouTube is pretty barren of any - unless you count the HO models. It's quite odd honestly...

Last edited by Mikado 4501

Thomas,  Great job on the upgrade.  Your engine looks and sounds great.  I agree with engine painted green instead of black.  I have the K-line 4501 in green which I like the detail on it but does lack the correct shape.  I am still interested in seeing the MTH version to compare.  Thanks for sharing your video.  

Lionlman posted:

Received the Lionel Southern "630" from Brian at Legacy Station today.  Here are a few pictures.  Many thanks to Lionel for changing the tender from the one that was pictured in the catalog.

630c630b630630a630d630e630f630g630h

hello lionlman, guys and gals....

That's a sharp looking Consol !!! I have been bitten hard by a "Southern" bug from my railking NW-2 switcher which has the road name "Southern" in green colors and gold pin stripes beautiful  little diesel.  It looks easy to make changes to my S.F. 5011 2-10-4 to "Southern 5011" just add white stripe on the running boards, paint the window frames Red and add "Southern" name and small number bellow the cab windows.   Southern didn't have large Texas type locomotives or did they ?  What was the largest 10 driver locomotive they had ?

Tiffany

Last edited by Tiffany

According to TIES Magazine Southern personnel referred to their 2-10-2 Santa Fe class as "Hogs" and /or "Big Fifties". The engines were equipped with floating front drivers and saw a lot of duty as pushers on the sharp curves of the Asheville Division  A few were eventually converted to 2-8-2 Mikados---classed as Ms-5 and Ms-6.

In 1918  #5046 was equipped as a "tender tractor" with a 2-6-2 tender under steam and survived until scrapped in 1926.

Last edited by Dewey Trogdon

Far as I know the Southern did not have any 2-10-4 Steam Locomotives on its roster.  They did use the 610 Texas and Pacific steam locomotive in excursion service in the late 1970’s as seen in the photo below.  I was hoping that one the Manufactures would create this model.  It was used as one of the American Freedom Train engines so I figure someone could create it for American Freedom Train and then offer it as Southern excursion train too but there appears not to be much interest.

610

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 610

Thomas

I happened to be online when Eric was broadcasting.  Thanks for sharing his broadcast at Legacy Station.  The whistle does sound good.  The quilling whistle is the same as Southern 4-6-2's and Kanawha that MTH has done in the past.  I was hoping that would be different.  Too bad he did not take some up close shots of the engine.  I noticed in the catalog that MTH did the cab different on both engines.  On the Scale engine they did it different as seen below.  I am not sure if the Scale engine is correct.  These photos are from the catalog; therefore, I was interested in seeing one up close. 

Hi-Rail Wheels Below

Mikado1black

Scale Version Below.

MikadoScaleblack

Hi-Rail Wheels below

MTHMikado

Scale Version Below.

Scaleversion

 It appears not too many dealers order these.  I guess not too many are interested. 

Attachments

Images (4)
  • Mikado1black
  • MikadoScaleblack
  • MTHMikado
  • Scaleversion

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×