Skip to main content

I just got OGRR's competitor mag in the mail.  It's a pretty good expanded 25th Anniversary edition.  To the point - Jerry Calabrese indicates that Lionel will introduce a simplified TrainMaster Command Control System called he CAB 1-L.  "It will be compatible with the top-end Legacy system, allowing more advanced operators to install it as a secondary system".

 

I know there's been alot of discussion about the need for this since the demise of the TMCC CAB 1.

 

It will be interesting to see it and see how it plays out.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I hope they do it. I have the Remote commander from MTH and it

works well on my small layout. I'd be willing to bet that the majority

of the users have small layouts and have a hard time justifying the price

of a full blown TMCC or DCS system. A small inexpensive system would be great.

I'd buy one in a minute....

 

Did they have a target release date yet ?

This doesn't sound like an alternate, just an add on.  It sounds like you will have the ability to buy additional remotes that will not have all of the features of the CAB-2 but will be able to talk directly to the Legacy base.  I've never seen the Legacy base for sale separately unless that is also part of their plan.

Originally Posted by SantaFeFan:

There is a Cab1-L and a Base1-L; a pair that operates as a lower cost Legacy compatible system.  The Cab1-L will operate with a Legacy Base; so the Base1-L is a separate sale.  The Cab1-L has a quilling horn feature; but otherwise is very close in operation to the CAB1.

Jon,

Will the Base1-L be similar to, or a substitute to, the old TMCC Command Base?

 

I have DCS, can't really find a TMCC Command Base (already have the CAB-1) at a decent price so I can run Lionel engines.  Will the Base1-L work with DCS?  Like others, I don't want to spend $200 just to get a single engine (my soon to arrive 3rd Rail E7) to run using all its features

Originally Posted by Bob Delbridge:
Originally Posted by SantaFeFan:

There is a Cab1-L and a Base1-L; a pair that operates as a lower cost Legacy compatible system.  The Cab1-L will operate with a Legacy Base; so the Base1-L is a separate sale.  The Cab1-L has a quilling horn feature; but otherwise is very close in operation to the CAB1.

Jon,

Will the Base1-L be similar to, or a substitute to, the old TMCC Command Base?

 

I have DCS, can't really find a TMCC Command Base (already have the CAB-1) at a decent price so I can run Lionel engines.  Will the Base1-L work with DCS?  Like others, I don't want to spend $200 just to get a single engine (my soon to arrive 3rd Rail E7) to run using all its features

>>Will the Base1-L be similar to, or a substitute to, the old TMCC Command Base?

I guess you could conclude such, similar and a substitute.  The 27Mhz product line is discontinued; so don't confuse the technologies of CAB1 and CAB1-L; which engineering is calling "Legacy Light"; hence CAB1-L (Legacy or Lite, not sure the marketing lingo...)

 

>>I don't want to spend $200 just to get a single engine[snip]

Costs, that is never a topic I can comment about!  Marketing sets the MSRP working with Accounting.  My task is to make it inexpensive to manufacture so MSRP is the best in class for the consumer.  Bob, you could always buy more engines

I guess Bob's concern is it will only operate 1 engine with 1 id ala the DCS mini system but from the sounds of it, it will operate the same 99 IDs that Legacy supports now.

 

So is there anything the Cab1 L has that the current Legacy does not or cannot support?  Without letting too much out of the bag.

Last edited by MartyE

Jon,

Thanks for the response.

 

I don't mind buying more engines, I guess my real question would be to Lionel AND MTH...will DCS communicate with this new Base1-L to operate TMCC and Legacy engines?

 

Things would be great if Lionel, MTH, Atlas, and 3rd Rail could combine forces to get their engines to run with both TMCC/Legacy and/or DCS.  I don't think I'm the only one who doesn't like spending $$$ on a system when you already have one in place.  It's kinda nuts when 2 of the 4 manufacturers I referenced above have to make do with an un-supported/no longer made command system (TMCC).  I don't know where Weaver and Williams By Bachmann fit in all of this, as far as I know they're still offered in conventional only.

Chuck

 

At what point though does the CAB1 L just become the Cab2?  The quillable whistle is in my opinion the "bone".  If you want all the Legacy feature you should get the Legacy system.

 

That's my only fear of the Cab1L.  All the "Why doesn't it have xyz" that the Legacy remote has complaints.  And there will be some.

Last edited by MartyE
Originally Posted by bigdodgetrain:

does or will the cab1-L replace the cab1? reason I ask is at the club, the cab1's are provided but, the legacy units must be owned by the operator. the cab1's are starting to show their age. if the lite units will be a low cost replacement that might be something to look into.

If your club has Legacy, you can run the TMCC trains through the Legacy controller using the CAB1-L, so it accomplishes the same thing.

Originally Posted by Bob Delbridge:

Jon,

Thanks for the response.

 

I don't mind buying more engines, I guess my real question would be to Lionel AND MTH...will DCS communicate with this new Base1-L to operate TMCC and Legacy engines?

 

Things would be great if Lionel, MTH, Atlas, and 3rd Rail could combine forces to get their engines to run with both TMCC/Legacy and/or DCS.  I don't think I'm the only one who doesn't like spending $$$ on a system when you already have one in place.  It's kinda nuts when 2 of the 4 manufacturers I referenced above have to make do with an un-supported/no longer made command system (TMCC).  I don't know where Weaver and Williams By Bachmann fit in all of this, as far as I know they're still offered in conventional only.

This has been covered before, Dcs is, and has been the system that is incompatable,not to mention more complicated. Wheres the TIU that will respond to my legacy remote? What do you mean "make do with an unsupported system"? Legacy is just a glorified TMCC system(albeit deservidly so) so wheres the problem?

Last edited by RickO
Originally Posted by MartyE:

Still gravy IMO.  Cab 1 had no train brake.  You want TB then pay for it.  Because then you are going to tick off the guys that bought Legacy.

 

Like I said if you want a dumb down version with basics of Cab1 then you get less.  AT least that's the way I see it.  The more you add to Cab1L the more it becomes Legacy.

Agreed. 

 

Of course we do need to see where the actual price point ends up to get a better feel for what should or should not be included for the money.

 

I'm assuming (which means I am guessing) the new toy will be at least $50 or more cheaper than a full up Legacy set.  Otherwise it wouldn't make sense for most folks to even consider it.  (Unfortunately, while it was a really great deal at the time, the $100 command base and remote sets for TMCC offered back around 1997 got too many folks into the mindset of thinking that a set should always be around $100)

 

-Dave

It would be interesting if the release (or at least cataloging) of the new base/remote coincide with the mid-level transformer rumored to be available very soon.

 

That could make a good package to get folks into Legacy control with a modern mid-level transformer much more economically than is possible now.

 

-Dave

Train brake has another function.  It can act like a selective panic button.  You can rapidly decelerate a specific engine in a hurry and then reset without doing a system panic.  

 

If you have Legacy specific equipment you need the CAB 2 to fully use it.  I think its great that they are coming up with a replacement for the old TMCC/CAB-1.  I do see some irony in transferring some CAB2 features to the new unit that are Legacy specific at the expense of other features that would enhance benefit ALL of Lionel's command equipped loco's, not just Legacy ones.

Originally Posted by SantaFeFan:

We will have a demo at York, so I have to leave some questions unanswered!

 

Bob, of course just having fun with you about buying more locos; hopefully the DCS system will connect with Base1-L(via serial); but I have not tried it.

Jon,

 

No problem!

 

It's been a chore for me trying to find a TMCC Command Base, every time I see one I'm either too slow on the bid or don't have the funds at that time.  I need the Command Base so I can run my TMCC engines (current and future ) using DCS.

 

The original poster indicated the Base1-L be a compatible with the "Top-End Legacy System".  Will it also be a backfit for the older TMCC System? (That sounds like just another way of stating my 1st question )

 

I only have the full-blown DCS, so I'm in the dark about all most things TMCC and Legacy (I only have the TMCC PowerMaster and a CAB-1).

Originally Posted by MartyE:
It sounds like it will not be compatible with TMCC.  Jon indicated the 27MHZ system is retired. Since the Cab1 and original base use that as the communication method it wouldn't seem so.
If it talks to the Legacy base, it's talking 2.4ghz, so that's quite a ways form 27mhz.

Originally Posted by Flash:
Is 27Mhz the frequency from CAB1 to command base?


Yes, that's how the CAB1 talks to the base or a PowerMaster.
Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×