Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I cannot say how the sound is on MTH BB.

But on the lionel vision line BB the sounds are awesome as well as the engine itself. I own some MTH ps-2 steamers and diesels all sound anemic to me.

 as to purchasing a BB tarry not am sure the latest from lionel is getting scarce.

 

if you haven't been to lionels video of the BB watch that video I do believe you will make a choice right after that viewing.

 

remember you need 0-72 minimum curves and 3 1/2" from center rail to wall to clear and also a straight section at least 12" or more to clear anything close to end of the curve as I have a tunnel with a 10 7/8" straight track and the front boiler just barely comes up straight prior to it entering the tunnel bore!

 

hope this helps you decide.

Now if you are talking the newly catalog MTH Big Boy, it will represent 4014 as it will be rebuilt and will run in the future.  It will be an oil burner.  It will also have a quillable, variable intensity steaming (smoking whistle).  An when the 4014 is running MTH will record a new "sound" file of the engine so it model will sound as the running Big Boy.

 

Ron

Originally Posted by ratpak:

I went for the MTH 4014....only 11 months left to pay it down

 

and I lost count of how many and which UP caboooses I bought

 

rat

ironically ratpak, I recently watched a video rails vcr tape of the big boy and on one scene it actually had a yellow caboose!

 

 

Originally Posted by ST PAUL:
Originally Posted by ratpak:

I went for the MTH 4014....only 11 months left to pay it down

 

and I lost count of how many and which UP caboooses I bought

 

rat

ironically ratpak, I recently watched a video rails vcr tape of the big boy and on one scene it actually had a yellow caboose!

 

 

Why would there not be yellow cabooses behind a Big Boy.  The order to paint the cabooses in yellow went out early/mid 1947.  The Big Boys survived into the late 50s.

 

 

I guess a bigger question is would there have been any "red" cabooses behind a Big Boy without exposed after-coolers.  Must edit this to not include 4020 through 4024.

 

Ron

Last edited by PRRronbh
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by ST PAUL:
Originally Posted by ratpak:

I went for the MTH 4014....only 11 months left to pay it down

 

and I lost count of how many and which UP caboooses I bought

 

rat

ironically ratpak, I recently watched a video rails vcr tape of the big boy and on one scene it actually had a yellow caboose!

 

 

Why would there not be yellow cabooses behind a Big Boy.  The order to paint the cabooses in yellow went out early/mid 1947.  The Big Boys survived into the late 50s.

 

Ron

I think in another thread it was said that a brown caboose with a certain number was the correct caboose behind big boys.

not sure if possibly a certain style of caboose is what they meant. I just noticed in video it had a yellow caboose tacked on.

Originally Posted by ST PAUL:
Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
Originally Posted by ST PAUL:
Originally Posted by ratpak:

I went for the MTH 4014....only 11 months left to pay it down

 

and I lost count of how many and which UP caboooses I bought

 

rat

ironically ratpak, I recently watched a video rails vcr tape of the big boy and on one scene it actually had a yellow caboose!

 

 

Why would there not be yellow cabooses behind a Big Boy.  The order to paint the cabooses in yellow went out early/mid 1947.  The Big Boys survived into the late 50s.

 

Ron

I think in another thread it was said that a brown caboose with a certain number was the correct caboose behind big boys.

not sure if possibly a certain style of caboose is what they meant. I just noticed in video it had a yellow caboose tacked on.

Based on my reference material all the red cabooses were most probably repainted yellow by 50/51.

 

As I edited my above post a bigger question would be was there any red cabooses behind a Big Boy that did NOT have exposed after-coolers(except 4020 through 4024).

 

Ron

Originally Posted by PRRronbh:
 

Based on my reference material all the red cabooses were most probably repainted yellow by 50/51.

 

As I edited my above post a bigger question would be was there any red cabooses behind a Big Boy that did NOT have exposed after-coolers(except 4020 through 4024).

 

Ron

That would be a yes, as the exposed after coolers where removed, starting in 1946, and the various UP cabooses were still "red/brown" through the late 1940s and into the early 1950s (with four digit road numbers).

Originally Posted by rboatertoo:

I am getting caught up in the big boy frennzy. Which one to buy?  I know the mth is $500 less, but I the best.

To try and answer the OP's original question; it really depends on what era you desire to model. Lionel chose to go with the "as delivered in 1941" configuration with their Vision Line models. Thus, the Vision Line models of the UP 4000 class do not look like the 8 surviving 4000s in museums and parks around the U.S.

 

On the other hand, MTH chose to model their recently announced 4000 class models in the "in service 1946 through 1959" configuration, which also matches the appearance of the 8 locomotives saved in museums and parks.

 

Hope this helps a bit in your choice.

My buddy only runs MTH engines and he thinks MTH is the best thing since sliced bread. But after he seen and heard  the new Lionel Big Boy run he said MTH has some catching up to do! Now he wants to buy a Legacy system because he wants the new Lionel BB.

I do not run MTH , but I own MTH engines, Standard gauge engines, subway cars, and rolling stock!  I just do not like the sound.

Last edited by maint

Careful searching will find MTH BBs with protosounds in the $500 range.  Command versions bring more, of course.

 

If you just want a Big Boy and features aren't a factor, consider the original Lionel TMCC BB. Captures the essence of the BB though not the best detail.  These can also be found in the $5-700 range with careful searching.

 

JLC Legacy BBs are still commanding a healthy premium.  Nice detail though.  One of my favorites.

 

VL BB may be hard to find.  Getting to the point where dealers are selling out (a few have popped up for sale here).  If you want one, act quick.  Expect to pay a premium.  Those on the Bay are a joke, calling forum sponsors would be your best bet at a reasonable price above pre-order value.

 

There was a 3rd Rail BB listed on the forum, sold recently on the Bay.  Very reasonable.

 

Good luck, let us know what you choose.

Originally Posted by rogerpete:

Dumb Question...

Why can't they change the swivel point on the articulating locomotives to decrease the overhang? 072 curves and you still need almost 4 inches? 

Because then it wouldn't be prototypical.  These scale locomotives are trying to be as true to the real deal as possible.  The LionMaster and RailKing BBs do have the pivot in a different place to reduce overhang and allow tighter curves.

 

To the OP, guess it depends on which system you use.  I went to Lionel because it had the most features and worked with the system I use, TMCC.

First rogerpete asked:  

 

"Why can't they change the swivel point on the articulating locomotives to decrease the overhang? 072 curves and you still need almost 4 inches?" 

 

upmontman followed with:

 

"not only that but they look terrible on 072 radius corners, just my opinion--Mark"

 

 

Guys... They are B-I-G  B-O-Y-S what the heck were you expecting?

 

 

Last edited by SantaFeJim
Originally Posted by SantaFeJim:

rboatertoo,

 

You must ask yourself if the disappearing coal load is worth the extra $500.

Jim I know I wouldn't pay $500.00 more for a depleting coal load. IMO, that just seems to be a waste of money. Don't get me wrong it's a great engine but in all honesty, the VL Big Boy is way over priced and out of my budget. 

 

 

Last edited by TRAINMANTIM

The Lionel VisionLine Big Boy was an engine I had planned to pass up as I have the JLC Legacy Big Boy. However, with all the discussions, videos and Talk about this new Feature Rich Locomotive, and a Dealer Offering a Fantastic Deal, I purchased one at the last minute. It Truly is an Amazing Locomotive, wheel slip mode, depleting coal, Smoke out the Whistle, Super Blow Down Effect, and on top of all of these features, It Smokes in Rhythm between Two Smoke Stacks, Like a Dragster on the Race Track. Couple all of this with a TWO YEAR WARRANTY, And Your Question is Answered. Have a Vision! Happy Railroading....

I guess I would buy that answer if all the BB owners ran 100 car ore trains over prototypical mountains, but I would bet that a small change, (such as swivel point) would not affect the prototypical looks at all, and would open up a lot more layouts to this old girl.  A 4" clearance on 072 curves- whats that? About 16 feet of hang over.
 
 
I would buy one- but I can't get over that way out snout-
 
I'm gonna go play with my Marx CV now...
 
Originally Posted by sinclair:
Originally Posted by rogerpete:

Dumb Question...

Why can't they change the swivel point on the articulating locomotives to decrease the overhang? 072 curves and you still need almost 4 inches? 

Because then it wouldn't be prototypical.  These scale locomotives are trying to be as true to the real deal as possible.  The LionMaster and RailKing BBs do have the pivot in a different place to reduce overhang and allow tighter curves.

 

To the OP, guess it depends on which system you use.  I went to Lionel because it had the most features and worked with the system I use, TMCC.

 

Last edited by rogerpete
Originally Posted by upmontman:

SantaFejim, are you running this engine on 072 curves?

 

No, all my engines are Santa Fe and they never had any Big Boys.  In addition, I am very lucky, the layout that I run on has a minimun radius of 120".

 

There are 3-4 Big Boys in our club and they are smo-o-o-o-th on those curves.

 

BTW, our largest radius is 138" and they look awesome on those.

 

 

Last edited by SantaFeJim

Well, I am an MTH fan and likely always will be.  But I have started buying Legacy and Vision engines because of all the extra operating features over MTH.  I also find Legacy to be a more robust system and less prone to quirky behavior (although I do believe DCS is a more feature-rich platform).  On these two bases alone, there is a fun factor to be considered.

 

In any event, I own the VLBB and run it a lot. You wouldn't be "paying $500 for a depleting coal load."  You'd be paying this money for the following differences:

 

-a more detailed model in that it includes the front of the locomotive opening to reveal a detailed inside as well as tender front doors that open

 

-in addition to stack and whistle steam, blow-down effects

 

-a variable glow ash pan

 

-fat boy speakers with adjustable volume in both the locomotive and tender

 

-depleting coal load

 

-the wheel spin feature

 

- the LCS stuff (although not sure it matters if not running on Lionel Fasttrack)

 

-the shroud (and respective synched smoke chuff/puff feature when shroud is in-place)

 

-no shipping fees in either direction for warranty repairs

 

-a 2-year warranty

 

-and a warranty turn-around time that, in my experience, is far superior (measured in months, not weeks)

 

And, not that it matters, but the VLBB was to some extent a limited production piece that it would be reasonable to assume would better hold its value.  

 

Having said all that, it would be hard to actually compare given the MTH BB isn't yet available. 

 

Peter

 

Last edited by PJB

Thank you PJB -- that comparison is helpful.

 

One other thing that would sway me is whether I lived in driving range of either Lionel or MTH.  More specifically, it seems like that given the frequency of repairs required on some of these new high-end locomotives, if I lived where I could drop off and pick up for service, that would be a persuasive reason for me to buy one over the other.

Originally Posted by RickM46:
Originally Posted by upmontman:

SantaFejim, are you running this engine on 072 curves?

I am for my small temporary layout and run at speed step 96; no issues.

RickM46

I've run mine at full speed on O72 on my floor loop and it took it just fine.  The train it was pulling stayed on the rails as well.  In fact I haven't had a single thing come off the track at full speed with O72, but then I haven't tried all of my stuff yet.

FWIW:  You may want to check out YouTube to see some videos of the BB running.  Even when you increase to 0-96, it still looks funny to me as the overhang is still severe.  I don't think going from 0-72 to 0-82 will really give you that much of an improvement, FWIW. 
This is just my opinion.  If you like running the BB on 0-72, go for it!  I saw one run in person for the first time last week at Stockyard Express and it was a sight to behold...and hear.
Originally Posted by RickM46:
Originally Posted by upmontman:

Rickm46, I know it works but I think it looks bad with all the overhang but hey what do I know?

Actually, you bring up a good point.  I am headed toward O82 for my layout - I want to keep the curves as gradual as possible for it and maybe decrease the over hang a bit.

RicKM46

 

Didn't "overhang" get exhausted on another thread a few weeks back?  I think my comment there was, in essence, that philosophically the model is engineered to do exactly what the real thing was designed to do, except that the model maximizes on the concept.  Just me, but I enjoy every aspect of this thing, including the well-engineered marvel of a boiler that smoothly swings in and out of position just like the real thing.

 

Seriously, if overhang is such an issue, I cringe to think what those concerned about overhang think about the third rail running all around their layouts! 

 

Peter   

  

Last edited by PJB
Originally Posted by PJB:

Didn't "overhang" get exhausted on another thread a few weeks back?  I think my comment there was, in essence, that philosophically the model is engineered to do exactly what the real thing was designed to do, except that the model maximizes on the concept.  Just me, but I enjoy every aspect of this thing, including the well-engineered marvel of a boiler that smoothly swings in and out of position just like the real thing.

 

Seriously, if overhang is such an issue, I cringe to think what those concerned about overhang think about the third rail running all around their layouts! 

 

Peter   

  

You hit the nail squarely on the head, Peter!!!!!

As mentioned, previously, JLC Legacy BB is worth considering. As a model, it is nearly identical to the new VL BBs, has Legacy and the key Legacy features, and is decidedly easier to purchase (~ $700 less, YMMV). Its only potential drawback (depending on the expectations of the user) is that it has the incorrect whistle sound. The JLC BB gets one into the game nicely for a lot less.

 

Food for thought.

 

Bob

Overhang? Who cares really... We cant make everyone happy. (The overhang is bad ,I cant run it on a 4x8 sheet of plywood) blah blah blah ..(I want  lionel to make lionmaster engines so i can run my challenger on 0-27) Blah blah ... Go buy H.O. if you have a 4x8 layout.. So silly you have a 34 1/2 inch engine its fregin big...

Guys,

I didn't want to derail this thread on the overhang issue.  Not my intent.  It means different things for different folks.

 

And, yes, the overhang has been beat to death in many threads.

 

Back to topic for the OP: The JLC Legacy BB is a great locomotive.  Another one of my favorites in my UP fleet.  Glass smooth runner, great sound, and nice detail. 

Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Tim, the depleting coal load is one of the lesser features for me.  The sound and great smoke features were high on the list as was the great detailing of the locomotive. 

Gunrunnerjohn, I would have to agree with you that the sound and smoke features are really cool. Those are the only things I like about the VL Bigboy. 

Originally Posted by TRAINMANTIM:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Tim, the depleting coal load is one of the lesser features for me.  The sound and great smoke features were high on the list as was the great detailing of the locomotive. 

Gunrunnerjohn, I would have to agree with you that the sound and smoke features are really cool. Those are the only things I like about the VL Bigboy. 

PJB's post above seems to run counter to your assertion that the MTH models are more detailed than the new Lionel Big Boy.  What's more detailed on the MTH Big Boy as compared to the Lionel Vision Line model?

Last edited by MTN
Originally Posted by leapinlarry:

The Lionel VisionLine Big Boy was an engine I had planned to pass up as I have the JLC Legacy Big Boy. However, with all the discussions, videos and Talk about this new Feature Rich Locomotive, and a Dealer Offering a Fantastic Deal, I purchased one at the last minute. It Truly is an Amazing Locomotive, wheel slip mode, depleting coal, Smoke out the Whistle, Super Blow Down Effect, and on top of all of these features, It Smokes in Rhythm between Two Smoke Stacks, Like a Dragster on the Race Track. Couple all of this with a TWO YEAR WARRANTY, And Your Question is Answered. Have a Vision! Happy Railroading....

AND FREE SHIPPING FOR REPAIRS WITHIN THAT 2 YEAR PERIOD!

Originally Posted by Norm Charbonneau:

Anyone got comparison photos of MTH's scale version vs. the JLC or VLBBs?

Norm,

 

Earlier today I received notification from Lionel that my VL Big Boy will be returned (fixed, I hope) to me next Monday. As I had planned, I will post pictures of it next to the MTH 20-3414-1 Premier Big Boy.

 

Alex

Originally Posted by MTN:
Originally Posted by TRAINMANTIM:
Originally Posted by gunrunnerjohn:

Tim, the depleting coal load is one of the lesser features for me.  The sound and great smoke features were high on the list as was the great detailing of the locomotive. 

Gunrunnerjohn, I would have to agree with you that the sound and smoke features are really cool. Those are the only things I like about the VL Bigboy. 

PJB's post above seems to run counter to your assertion that the MTH models are more detailed than the new Lionel Big Boy.  What's more detailed on the MTH Big Boy as compared to the Lionel Vision Line model?

MTN - while I try to read every GRJ in a thread I read (usually very informative), in this case I don't believe I saw GRJ's post.  In any event, my post was intended only to point out broad stroke differences (the things mentioned - the boiler front opening door and the tender functional doors). It could be that MTH's release may have more rivets or tubes or other fine details - but won't know till issued.

Last edited by PJB
Originally Posted by PAUL ROMANO:

Both Lionel and MTH Big Boys are nice models but both manufacturers got the back of the cab detailing wrong. Although not a vestibule cab, the Big Boys had two doors in the middle, on the back of the cab, not curtains. The cab was enclosed. Sunset Models didn't do it right either..........

you are correct Paul

 

BB1

Attachments

Images (1)
  • BB1

I went with the Lionel Big Boy. I got it today, but I have other work to do in the room and if I take it out.....  I'll never get the other stuff done!!!   But after reading all of the posts, I know I made the right decision.  I was stuck in the postwar world.  Now my life will never be the same!!!!   It all start with the Monon Passenger set.  I have to stop listening to the NOTCH 6 podcast.  He review both engines and I was hooked. I am afraid to listen on Monday....  Maybe my credit card company will raise my limit.....

You will not regret it!

I got mine last Thursday and have been learning its characteristics ever since - so many and so awesome.

It took awhile for me to read the manual.

But, it is only the beginning.

I wound up getting the 990 Legacy Controller, then the ZW-L transformer.

Took awhile to read their manuals too.

Hopefully, you know you need a minimum of O72 track.

RickM46

And now it starts.

 

Originally Posted by JohnS:
Originally Posted by PAUL ROMANO:

Both Lionel and MTH Big Boys are nice models but both manufacturers got the back of the cab detailing wrong. Although not a vestibule cab, the Big Boys had two doors in the middle, on the back of the cab, not curtains. The cab was enclosed. Sunset Models didn't do it right either..........

you are correct Paul

 

BB1

Well, yes and no. The UP "all weather cab" design had a pair of fold-away doors assemblies across the entire back wall of the cab. All "Big Three" locomotive models had this arrangement, i.e. the FEF-2 & FEF-3 4-8-4s, the 3900 class 4-6-6-4s, and the 4000 class 4-8-8-4s. Surprisingly the UP did have some 4900s and 4000s equipped with cab curtains, although photos of them are hard to find. The cab curtains would only have been used in more warmer weather, when the back door arrangement was folded-away, and fully open. 

 

In preparation for the colder months, the shop force would unfold the rear door arrangement, and then install steam coils on the center, fixed portion of the back wall. There were two doors, one on the Engineer's side and one on the Fireman's side of the back wall for entering and exiting the cab.

 

As a side note, Lionel did a pretty good job of modeling the "closed-up" rear of the cab, on their model of FEF-3 #844.

Here's a shot of the BB with enclosed cab.

Notice the third big red dial. Also, past MTH BB tenders have a different marker and backup light arrangement then the Lionel VL BB tender. 

Also, I notice the new VL BB at idle does not have that familiar loud thumping boiler sound I hear on most other Legacy steams. Anyone know if that is prototypical to the BB or Lionel simply did not include that sound? 

Joe 

 

bigboy cab

Attachments

Images (1)
  • bigboy cab
Last edited by JC642

Somewhat off topic:  But as Hot Water started mentioning the cab curtain/enclosure history of the Big Boys in detail, it reminded me of my visit to the 4005 in Denver a few years ago.  If anyone finds themselves in Denver for whatever reason, the museum is worth a visit.  It's a close cab ride to the Airport and also has lots of cars and motorcycles on display.

What's somewhat unique about the 4005 (unfortunately) is that it was involved in a tragic accident as a repair crew working on a switch off the UP Main didn't get it closed in time.  The 4005 hit it at speed....and both the fireman and engineer were killed as the Big Boy went tumbling off the track.  You can still see signs of the damage and its subsequent repair in the cab.

The museum also has a display of tools used to work on and maintain the BB.  For a civilian like me used to working on cars, these tools/wrenches are HUGE and have to be seen to be believed.

Originally Posted by JC642:

Here's a shot of the BB with enclosed cab.

Notice the third big red dial. Also, past MTH BB tenders have a different marker and backup light arrangement then the Lionel VL BB tender. 

Also, I notice the new VL BB at idle does not have that familiar loud thumping boiler sound I hear on most other Legacy steams. Anyone know if that is prototypical to the BB or Lionel simply did not include that sound? 

Joe 

 

bigboy cab

Not to derail the topic, but I never understood why O Gauge manufacturers (with the exception of 3rd Rail I believe) do not include the third red ash-pan valve wheel on the Big Boy.  

 

Back on topic, my vote is for the VL Big Boy.  Superior sound and better details. 

Originally Posted by Norm Charbonneau:

Anyone got comparison photos of MTH's scale version vs. the JLC or VLBBs?

Here's a few shots taken awhile back. Hard to see but the MTH BB is about two inches longer then the JLC with is exactly the same as the VL BB. I long ago sold the MTH BB but if I recall, it had the enclosed cab.

Also, notice the marker and backup light are different.

Have no idea which one is correct.

Joe

 

 

S7000295

S7000297

Photo060

Photo059

Attachments

Images (4)
  • S7000295
  • S7000297
  • Photo060
  • Photo059
Last edited by JC642
Originally Posted by Berkshire President:

Above the running boards, there appears to be more cast in detail on the MTH unit while Lionel's appears to be smoother....either on purpose or b/c they didn't add the extra detail.

 

So, the question becomes, who is more correct?

The "who is more correct?" question can really only be answered by the question of exactly what era/time frame the model is patterned after. The Vision Line model is supposed to be "as delivered" while the MTH model/models vary from "as delivered" to "in service post 1950".

Fair enough....and understood.
 
Originally Posted by Hot Water:
Originally Posted by Berkshire President:

Above the running boards, there appears to be more cast in detail on the MTH unit while Lionel's appears to be smoother....either on purpose or b/c they didn't add the extra detail.

 

So, the question becomes, who is more correct?

The "who is more correct?" question can really only be answered by the question of exactly what era/time frame the model is patterned after. The Vision Line model is supposed to be "as delivered" while the MTH model/models vary from "as delivered" to "in service post 1950".

 

I hold no prejudices and always buy from those providing the absolute most value for the least amount of money. If I were to buy a Big Boy ( don't have the layout curves and run exclusively Eastern routes) I would lean towards the MTH with its higher detail, equal features and competitive price. If operation is the issue; MTH is controlled remotely much the same as Lionel and they run on TMCC and Legacy.

MTH BB Cab #4004, Part #20-3228-1E Photos

 

Here is my MTH BB. I have had it for a couple of years, I got it from ebay for less than a $1000. I am happy with it and I think it is a great loco.

 

I will be receiving my Lionel VL BB in a few days. If I have time, I will post some pictures of both of them side by side.

 

I think each rendition has its own merits and the best thing to do to settle who's better, for me anyway, is to get one from each manufacturer I know it is a lot of money, but I sold all of my HO collection to get into O scale, and so far no regrets.

 

 

IMG_2862

IMG_2863

IMG_2864

IMG_2865

IMG_2866

IMG_2867

IMG_2868

IMG_2869

IMG_2870

IMG_2871

IMG_2872

IMG_2873

IMG_2875

Attachments

Images (13)
  • IMG_2862
  • IMG_2863
  • IMG_2864
  • IMG_2865
  • IMG_2866
  • IMG_2867
  • IMG_2868
  • IMG_2869
  • IMG_2870
  • IMG_2871
  • IMG_2872
  • IMG_2873
  • IMG_2875
Originally Posted by cbojanower:
Originally Posted by Bob Bubeck:

Its only potential drawback (depending on the expectations of the user) is that it has the incorrect whistle sound.

There is a simple fix for that, AF big boys used the same chip with the correct sound. But side by side the new big boy blows away the sound of the older one

Not so sure that's a viable option. According to the Lionel parts breakdown on the AFBB, the part is $55 and you have to chase Lionel to (maybe) get it from them:

 

http://www.lionel.com/Customer...c1-80ef-d468105d1d76

 

If there's one thing that makes me want to cut loose my JLCBB, it's the weak and incorrect whistle sound.

Guess after seeing the MTH version with the correct enclosed cab I'm slightly let down (not ready to shed my VLBB though).  Why the heck does Lionel use (incorrect) curtains?  For the MSRP it should at least have been accurate on basic aspects like this.  Seems like MTH also has 3 crew members in the cab over the 2 in the VLBB and JLC, etc.  

 

Peter 

Last edited by PJB

Add Reply

Post

OGR Publishing, Inc., 1310 Eastside Centre Ct, Suite 6, Mountain Home, AR 72653
800-980-OGRR (6477)
www.ogaugerr.com

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×
×